Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is an application that uses FSK. But the actual information is
not coded by the frequency shift but rather by the length of time one of the pulses is turned on. The pulses are about 2 milliseconds long. The information is coded on one of them. The other is always the same length. The frequency shift is always a constant. Now, my question. If you send this signal into a standard FM Rx it will produce a tone. Is this tone simply the difference between the two RF frequencys? Is the information coded on the one pulse lost in such reception? Or is this audio tone something far more complex that still contains encoded information? TIA |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , James
writes There is an application that uses FSK. But the actual information is not coded by the frequency shift but rather by the length of time one of the pulses is turned on. The pulses are about 2 milliseconds long. The information is coded on one of them. The other is always the same length. The frequency shift is always a constant. Now, my question. If you send this signal into a standard FM Rx it will produce a tone. Why? The two frequencies do not exist at the same time in the receiver. Mike |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
M. J. Powell wrote: In message , James writes Now, my question. If you send this signal into a standard FM Rx it will produce a tone. Why? The two frequencies do not exist at the same time in the receiver. But if the shifting, the pulse repetition, is taking place at a high enough frequency it will be heard as a tone. And, yes, the information is still there because the waveform of the tone should be that of the modulating signal. -- jhhaynes at earthlink dot net |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"James" wrote in message
om... There is an application that uses FSK. But the actual information is not coded by the frequency shift but rather by the length of time one of the pulses is turned on. The pulses are about 2 milliseconds long. The information is coded on one of them. The other is always the same length. The frequency shift is always a constant. Now, my question. If you send this signal into a standard FM Rx it will produce a tone. Is this tone simply the difference between the two RF frequencys? Is the information coded on the one pulse lost in such reception? Or is this audio tone something far more complex that still contains encoded information? You won't hear a "tone". The FM demod audio output will follow the rate of change of the carrier frequency. For example, if the carrier frequency changes at a constant rate, you'll hear a tone during the frequency transition period. There will be no audio output during the period of time that the carrier is not changing frequency. How long the carrier sits at the frequency which contains the duration-encoded information will not be detectable at the audio output because the carrier isn't changing frequency at that time. If the frequency transitions are abrupt, you'll hear something like a click between the mark and space frequencies. .. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Data Precision frequency counter 5740 question | Equipment | |||
Phase frequency Detector | Homebrew | |||
Technical question for receiving TV signals by a loop Antenna | Antenna | |||
Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade | Homebrew | |||
Single Sideband FM | Homebrew |