The RSCB - An organisations of Sick Perverts?
 

In their latest edition of, "BadCon", the RSCB publish
two letters bemoaning the lowering of standards that has allowed
grown men to groom younger ladies over the air.

The reply from Peter Kirby, the RSCB's general manager says
that he is thankful that very few people have observed that.

Sorry, run that one past me again? He is thankful that the number
of people who have observed this foul behaviour are in the
minority?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why, can it be that he supports such foul behaviour - he doesn't
go on to condemn it at all, but justifies the presence of such
perverts as are complained of because it halted a decline in the
number of Radio Hams. Since when? In which year has there
been a decline in the number of Radio Hams?

Mr.Kirby seems to justify the grooming of young girls because there
have been 9000 "Newcomers" - at least he doesn't claim that they
are Radio Hams - (they're not - they're CBers), and, in fact, have done
nothing to halt the decline in Radio Hams that he posits, if there ever was
such a decline.

Justify? Certainly - he is replying to two letters whose main thrust was
a criticism of such grooming AND HE IS DEFENDING THE STATE OF
AFFAIRS THAT GAVE RISE TO SUCH GROOMING.

Mr.Kirby then says that, "over the past four decades most radio amateurs
were
ex-military trained engineers and operators;" Sorry, but that is absolute
********. It's one thing to have a dubious case, but quite another
to adopt the Tony B. Liar approach to downright lying!

Mr.Kirby finishes by saying, "It seems to me that less
criticism and more encouragement should be the order
of the day". In response to what was criticism of the grooming
of young girls by older men, it makes Peter Kirby in particular
and the RSCB in general to seem very, very sick indeed.

-----ooooo-----

On the subject of sick perverts, how is it that Brian Reay G8OSN
continues to hold such a prominent position in the RSCB's hierarchy?
The record of the uk.radio.amateur shows Mr.Reay to be obsessed
by the subject of sheep shagging, a topic that he gratuitously
raised time and time again. Such an oft-published obsession surely is
sufficient
grounds to disbar Mr.Reay from any activity that involves
contact with children?

-----ooooo-----

IS THE RSCB COMPLETELY RIDDLED BY SEXUAL PERVERTS?

In article , says...

rubbish snipped

Gareth, do shut up. Your postings on children, particularly the Soham
girls, aren't exactly of the highest order

"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message
...

On the subject of sick perverts... (cut)

try he http://forum.ogrish.com/forumdisplay.php?f=27

"Airy R. Bean, the most repulsive object ever to crawl from a Chippenham
sewer" wrote his usual retarded garbage in message
...
In their latest edition of, "BadCon", the RSCB publish
two letters bemoaning the lowering of standards that has allowed
grown men to groom younger ladies over the air.

The reply from Peter Kirby, the RSCB's general manager says
that he is thankful that very few people have observed that.

Sorry, run that one past me again? He is thankful that the number
of people who have observed this foul behaviour are in the
minority?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why, can it be that he supports such foul behaviour - he doesn't
go on to condemn it at all, but justifies the presence of such
perverts as are complained of because it halted a decline in the
number of Radio Hams. Since when? In which year has there
been a decline in the number of Radio Hams?

Mr.Kirby seems to justify the grooming of young girls because there
have been 9000 "Newcomers" - at least he doesn't claim that they
are Radio Hams - (they're not - they're CBers), and, in fact, have done
nothing to halt the decline in Radio Hams that he posits, if there ever
was
such a decline.

Justify? Certainly - he is replying to two letters whose main thrust was
a criticism of such grooming AND HE IS DEFENDING THE STATE OF
AFFAIRS THAT GAVE RISE TO SUCH GROOMING.

Mr.Kirby then says that, "over the past four decades most radio amateurs
were
ex-military trained engineers and operators;" Sorry, but that is absolute
********. It's one thing to have a dubious case, but quite another
to adopt the Tony B. Liar approach to downright lying!

Mr.Kirby finishes by saying, "It seems to me that less
criticism and more encouragement should be the order
of the day". In response to what was criticism of the grooming
of young girls by older men, it makes Peter Kirby in particular
and the RSCB in general to seem very, very sick indeed.

-----ooooo-----

On the subject of sick perverts, how is it that Brian Reay G8OSN
continues to hold such a prominent position in the RSCB's hierarchy?
The record of the uk.radio.amateur shows Mr.Reay to be obsessed
by the subject of sheep shagging, a topic that he gratuitously
raised time and time again. Such an oft-published obsession surely is
sufficient
grounds to disbar Mr.Reay from any activity that involves
contact with children?

-----ooooo-----

IS THE RSCB COMPLETELY RIDDLED BY SEXUAL PERVERTS?

Remind us Airy, what does your £350 law book say about libel?
(___!___)

"Airy R. Bean, the most repulsive object ever to crawl from a Chippenham
sewer" wrote his usual retarded garbage in message
...
In their latest edition of, "BadCon", the RSCB publish...
crap snipped

Do you see Airy?
Airy is in the skool bike sheds sniffing the saddles.
Sniff Airy, sniff.

Do you see the plods?
Airy sees the plods.
The plods see Airy.
Run Airy, run.

Do you see the £350 law book?
Airy waves it at the plods.
The plods see the £350 law book.
Run plods, run.

Do you see the sheep?
Airy sees the sheep.
The sheep sees Airy.
Run sheep, run.

On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 20:44:39 GMT, arabacle wrote:

It says people who repeat libels are also guilty of libel.

Can you libel someone who doesn't have a reputation worth
libelling?

--

Jock.

The difference between genius and stupidity is that
genius has its limits.
-- Einstein

There are a considerable amount of perverts in the well known magazine
publishing company The Radio Society of Great Britain Limited.

Here are a few to be going on with http://tinyurl.com/6e33w

Here are a few to be going on with http://tinyurl.com/6e33w


David Crosby was cool when he was in The Byrds........

"arabacle" wrote in message
...
In message , Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI
writes

[ alleged libel snipped }
Remind us Airy, what does your £350 law book say about libel?
(___!___)


It says people who repeat libels are also guilty of libel.
HTH

Does that mean if I saw something libellous written about me and challenged
the author quoting his / her words, that I would be guilty of libelling
myself?
--
;)
73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint.
http://turner-smith.co.uk

That a statement that is complained of is true is a defence against a libel
action but does not prevent that action from being brought.

Fair Comment is also a defence.

"Arabacle" is correct in her assertion.

"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 20:44:39 GMT, arabacle
wrote:
It says people who repeat libels are also guilty of libel.
For a statement to be libellous, it has to be untrue.

"Airy R. Bean, village idiot" wrung out her tampon in
message ...
That a statement that is complained of is true is a defence against a
libel
action but does not prevent that action from being brought.

A civil action can only be brought against a real person by another real
person.
'Airy R. Bean' is not a real person, it is a sock puppet name that anyone is
equally free to use.

Do you see Airy?
Airy is in the skool bike sheds sniffing the saddles.
Sniff Airy, sniff.

Do you see the plods?
Airy sees the plods.
The plods see Airy.
Run Airy, run.

Do you see the £350 law book?
Airy waves it at the plods.
The plods see the £350 law book.
Run plods, run.

Do you see the sheep?
Airy sees the sheep.
The sheep sees Airy.
Run sheep, run.

Do you see Airy's gum boots?
Airy needs them for the sheep.
Do you see Airy's marbles?
Neither does Airy.
Poor Airy, he's lost both his gum boots and his marbles.

See you in Court, tosser.
(___!___)

It says people who repeat libels are also guilty of libel.
HTH


Just a thought but if you guys REALLY BELIEVE that there is something
wrong with the RSGB and it is populated with " Sick Perverts " then
please report it to the police or social services. If not then please do
not make light of such matters for your own personal feuds. There is
nothing sicker than those using such problems for their own amusement.
Thank you.
--
Bill

so i better bring a whole flock of sheep to the n wales rallie then its
seems there is going to be a demand (maybe i could charge perhaps a pound a
go with reductions for the usual concessions )

"Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI" wrote in message
...
See you in Court, tosser.
(___!___)

Frank is it me or have you enlarged the gluteas? ;-)

--

73s de Walter R.

"yammyr6" wrote in message
...
so i better bring a whole flock of sheep to the n wales rallie then its
seems there is going to be a demand (maybe i could charge perhaps a pound
a
go with reductions for the usual concessions )


And this is relevant because........?

"Bill" wrote in message
...
It says people who repeat libels are also guilty of libel.
HTH


Just a thought but if you guys REALLY BELIEVE that there is something
wrong with the RSGB and it is populated with " Sick Perverts " then
please report it to the police or social services. If not then please do
not make light of such matters for your own personal feuds. There is
nothing sicker than those using such problems for their own amusement.
Thank you.

I agree Bill. Such mis-use of such a serious matter is one stop from
condoning such activities.

--
Brian Reay
www.g8osn.org.uk
www.amateurradiotraining.org.uk
FP#898

That's rich coming from Brian Reay who is a sick pervert
obsessed with sheep shagging, as the record of uk.radio.amateur
shows. Mr.Reay repeatedly and gratuitously published his obsession
and continued to do so over a period of many months.

Now, Mr.Reay holds a prominent position in the RSCB's
training hierarchy into which he must inevitably come into
contact with children.

I say that he is an unsuitable candidate for such a position because of
his repeatedly published obsession with sheep-shagging.

As to condoning such activities, ISTR that the behaviour of the
RSCB's Peter Kirby in seeming to condone such activity was
the origin of this thread.

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
"Bill" wrote in message
...
It says people who repeat libels are also guilty of libel.
HTH
Just a thought but if you guys REALLY BELIEVE that there is something
wrong with the RSGB and it is populated with " Sick Perverts " then
please report it to the police or social services. If not then please do
not make light of such matters for your own personal feuds. There is
nothing sicker than those using such problems for their own amusement.
Thank you.
I agree Bill. Such mis-use of such a serious matter is one stop from
condoning such activities.

"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 20:44:39 GMT, arabacle
wrote:

It says people who repeat libels are also guilty of libel.

For a statement to be libellous, it has to be untrue.


Actually, the person making the statement has to prove it is true. That
isn't the same thing.

Then again, you are just trying to throw mud at people you don't like.

Dirty tricks. No more, no less.

"Bill" wrote in message
...
It says people who repeat libels are also guilty of libel.
HTH


Just a thought but if you guys REALLY BELIEVE that there is something
wrong with the RSGB and it is populated with " Sick Perverts " then
please report it to the police or social services. If not then please do
not make light of such matters for your own personal feuds. There is
nothing sicker than those using such problems for their own amusement.
Thank you.

Of course, they could be trying to mask their own activities.

One previous 'contributor' to this NG who had a thing about perverts was
himself once arrested for rape.

RU suggesting that we might be witnessing side-stepping, bull****ting
and downright lying?

"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 13:26:50 -0000, "Nimrod" wrote:
"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 20:44:39 GMT, arabacle
wrote:
It says people who repeat libels are also guilty of libel.
For a statement to be libellous, it has to be untrue.
Actually, the person making the statement has to prove it is true. That
isn't the same thing.
Then again, you are just trying to throw mud at people you don't like.
Dirty tricks. No more, no less.
Why can you not post under your own name, Brian?

"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message
...
RU suggesting that we might be witnessing side-stepping, bull****ting
and downright lying?


Would you mind ****ing off from uk.r.a?

IOW, cut out the cross-posting...although come to think of it, that's
probably well beyond you capabilities.


tox

"Airy R. Bean, the most repulsive object ever to crawl from a Chippenham
sewer" airy.r.bean@retarded.**** scrawled another load of his usual
garbage in message ...
That's rich coming from Brian Reay who is a sick pervert
obsessed with sheep shagging, as the record of uk.radio.amateur
shows. Mr.Reay repeatedly and gratuitously published his obsession
and continued to do so over a period of many months.

Now, Mr.Reay holds a prominent position in the RSCB's
training hierarchy into which he must inevitably come into
contact with children.

I say that he is an unsuitable candidate for such a position because of
his repeatedly published obsession with sheep-shagging.

As to condoning such activities, ISTR that the behaviour of the
RSCB's Peter Kirby in seeming to condone such activity was
the origin of this thread.

Anyone fancy a trip to Chippenham? Private email please to arrange a date
and time.
--
;)
73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint.
http://turner-smith.co.uk

"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message
...
as the record of uk.radio.amateur
shows.

Gareth (aka Airy) responds with vile and false claims went he is beaten in
an argument.

"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message
...
RU suggesting that we might be witnessing side-stepping, bull****ting
and downright lying?


Well you started the thread.

"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 13:26:50 -0000, "Nimrod" wrote:


"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 20:44:39 GMT, arabacle
wrote:

It says people who repeat libels are also guilty of libel.

For a statement to be libellous, it has to be untrue.


Actually, the person making the statement has to prove it is true. That
isn't the same thing.

Then again, you are just trying to throw mud at people you don't like.

Dirty tricks. No more, no less.

Why can you not post under your own name, Brian?

Ask Nick to explain it to you. Slowly as you seem to be a slow learner.

"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 13:26:53 -0000, "Nimrod" wrote:

Of course, they could be trying to mask their own activities.

One previous 'contributor' to this NG who had a thing about perverts was
himself once arrested for rape.

1. Which newsgroup? You are crossposting to three.


Possibly all three, I don't check all his postings.

This is a good "bite" a big fish indeed. I suggest you Google and see if you
can solve the mystery of his, and my, identity.
(Try rape and GBH)

Nick might help you but ask him to explain slowly as you seem to be
confused.

Ho Hum this fun.

"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
...

Have you Googled yet fat boy?