In their latest edition of, "BadCon", the RSCB publish
two letters bemoaning the lowering of standards that has allowed
grown men to groom younger ladies over the air.

The reply from Peter Kirby, the RSCB's general manager says
that he is thankful that very few people have observed that.

Sorry, run that one past me again? He is thankful that the number
of people who have observed this foul behaviour are in the
minority?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why, can it be that he supports such foul behaviour - he doesn't
go on to condemn it at all, but justifies the presence of such
perverts as are complained of because it halted a decline in the
number of Radio Hams. Since when? In which year has there
been a decline in the number of Radio Hams?

Mr.Kirby seems to justify the grooming of young girls because there
have been 9000 "Newcomers" - at least he doesn't claim that they
are Radio Hams - (they're not - they're CBers), and, in fact, have done
nothing to halt the decline in Radio Hams that he posits, if there ever was
such a decline.

Justify? Certainly - he is replying to two letters whose main thrust was
a criticism of such grooming AND HE IS DEFENDING THE STATE OF
AFFAIRS THAT GAVE RISE TO SUCH GROOMING.

Mr.Kirby then says that, "over the past four decades most radio amateurs
were
ex-military trained engineers and operators;" Sorry, but that is absolute
********. It's one thing to have a dubious case, but quite another
to adopt the Tony B. Liar approach to downright lying!

Mr.Kirby finishes by saying, "It seems to me that less
criticism and more encouragement should be the order
of the day". In response to what was criticism of the grooming
of young girls by older men, it makes Peter Kirby in particular
and the RSCB in general to seem very, very sick indeed.

-----ooooo-----

On the subject of sick perverts, how is it that Brian Reay G8OSN
continues to hold such a prominent position in the RSCB's hierarchy?
The record of the uk.radio.amateur shows Mr.Reay to be obsessed
by the subject of sheep shagging, a topic that he gratuitously
raised time and time again. Such an oft-published obsession surely is
sufficient
grounds to disbar Mr.Reay from any activity that involves
contact with children?

-----ooooo-----

IS THE RSCB COMPLETELY RIDDLED BY SEXUAL PERVERTS?

In article , says...

rubbish snipped

Gareth, do shut up. Your postings on children, particularly the Soham
girls, aren't exactly of the highest order

"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message
...

On the subject of sick perverts... (cut)

try he http://forum.ogrish.com/forumdisplay.php?f=27

"Airy R. Bean, the most repulsive object ever to crawl from a Chippenham
sewer" wrote his usual retarded garbage in message
...
In their latest edition of, "BadCon", the RSCB publish
two letters bemoaning the lowering of standards that has allowed
grown men to groom younger ladies over the air.

The reply from Peter Kirby, the RSCB's general manager says
that he is thankful that very few people have observed that.

Sorry, run that one past me again? He is thankful that the number
of people who have observed this foul behaviour are in the
minority?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why, can it be that he supports such foul behaviour - he doesn't
go on to condemn it at all, but justifies the presence of such
perverts as are complained of because it halted a decline in the
number of Radio Hams. Since when? In which year has there
been a decline in the number of Radio Hams?

Mr.Kirby seems to justify the grooming of young girls because there
have been 9000 "Newcomers" - at least he doesn't claim that they
are Radio Hams - (they're not - they're CBers), and, in fact, have done
nothing to halt the decline in Radio Hams that he posits, if there ever
was
such a decline.

Justify? Certainly - he is replying to two letters whose main thrust was
a criticism of such grooming AND HE IS DEFENDING THE STATE OF
AFFAIRS THAT GAVE RISE TO SUCH GROOMING.

Mr.Kirby then says that, "over the past four decades most radio amateurs
were
ex-military trained engineers and operators;" Sorry, but that is absolute
********. It's one thing to have a dubious case, but quite another
to adopt the Tony B. Liar approach to downright lying!

Mr.Kirby finishes by saying, "It seems to me that less
criticism and more encouragement should be the order
of the day". In response to what was criticism of the grooming
of young girls by older men, it makes Peter Kirby in particular
and the RSCB in general to seem very, very sick indeed.

-----ooooo-----

On the subject of sick perverts, how is it that Brian Reay G8OSN
continues to hold such a prominent position in the RSCB's hierarchy?
The record of the uk.radio.amateur shows Mr.Reay to be obsessed
by the subject of sheep shagging, a topic that he gratuitously
raised time and time again. Such an oft-published obsession surely is
sufficient
grounds to disbar Mr.Reay from any activity that involves
contact with children?

-----ooooo-----

IS THE RSCB COMPLETELY RIDDLED BY SEXUAL PERVERTS?

Remind us Airy, what does your £350 law book say about libel?
(___!___)

"Airy R. Bean, the most repulsive object ever to crawl from a Chippenham
sewer" wrote his usual retarded garbage in message
...
In their latest edition of, "BadCon", the RSCB publish...
crap snipped

Do you see Airy?
Airy is in the skool bike sheds sniffing the saddles.
Sniff Airy, sniff.

Do you see the plods?
Airy sees the plods.
The plods see Airy.
Run Airy, run.

Do you see the £350 law book?
Airy waves it at the plods.
The plods see the £350 law book.
Run plods, run.

Do you see the sheep?
Airy sees the sheep.
The sheep sees Airy.
Run sheep, run.

On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 20:44:39 GMT, arabacle wrote:

It says people who repeat libels are also guilty of libel.

Can you libel someone who doesn't have a reputation worth
libelling?

--

Jock.

The difference between genius and stupidity is that
genius has its limits.
-- Einstein

There are a considerable amount of perverts in the well known magazine
publishing company The Radio Society of Great Britain Limited.

Here are a few to be going on with http://tinyurl.com/6e33w

Here are a few to be going on with http://tinyurl.com/6e33w


David Crosby was cool when he was in The Byrds........

"arabacle" wrote in message
...
In message , Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI
writes

[ alleged libel snipped }
Remind us Airy, what does your £350 law book say about libel?
(___!___)


It says people who repeat libels are also guilty of libel.
HTH

Does that mean if I saw something libellous written about me and challenged
the author quoting his / her words, that I would be guilty of libelling
myself?
--
;)
73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint.
http://turner-smith.co.uk

That a statement that is complained of is true is a defence against a libel
action but does not prevent that action from being brought.

Fair Comment is also a defence.

"Arabacle" is correct in her assertion.

"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 20:44:39 GMT, arabacle
wrote:
It says people who repeat libels are also guilty of libel.
For a statement to be libellous, it has to be untrue.