![]() |
I don't understand 'split'
I don't understand split operation. So, I tried googling for articles, and
found one at http://www.guam.net/pub/midxa/nl/nl_apr98.html Here is an excerpt which emphasizes my confusion: "When do you need to go to a split operation ? When the people you are giving reports to are not answering, or when you are not getting your report from the station you are working because of other stations who are continuously calling. Simply, when the QRM starts slowing you down. Split operation moves the QRM and you are no longer forced to wait for 20 or 30 stations to stop calling you so you can work one of them Modern transceivers today come equipped with two VFO's - some even come with two receivers. The RIT (on Yaesu rigs, the CLARIFIER) can also be used for split operations. The primary goal of a split operation is to get the calling stations (the pileup) far enough away from the DX station so that the pileup causes no interference on frequency the DX station is transmitting on." So, this seems to say that if you are getting so much QRM that you can't hear the calling stations, you move them to a different frequency. OK, so you move them to a different frequency. How does that help anything if they are at 14.12 instead of 14.10? They are still all calling in the same place. I guess I do see that you might be better heard, if you have a transmit frequency and a listen frequency, no one is talking over your transmit frequency so stations can hear you without QRM. But if you have a listen frequency, that's where everyone will be and the DX station will always have to deal with QRM. Am I missing something? 73, -- Dave * N3WTK (DM04xf) * http://isi.mtwilson.edu * n3wtk at arrl dot net |
However, there is a viable alternative to ''running split''. That is selecting the calling stations by number (in their callsigh), or areas of the world, i.e. US Only, VE only, etc. I HATE that because I always seem to tune in just as they've finished with the 9's ! jw k9rzz |
"J999w" wrote in message ... However, there is a viable alternative to ''running split''. That is selecting the calling stations by number (in their callsigh), or areas of the world, i.e. US Only, VE only, etc. I HATE that because I always seem to tune in just as they've finished with the 9's ! jw k9rzz Yep....it can indeed be frustrating. I remember when I operated from the Marshal islands in the 80s. I was really impressed with the Japanese amateurs. They were and are a very disciplined group. Later on I found out why. They were using a simplex 2m FM channel to cooridinate DX hunting. Kept down the doubles and talking over folks really well. Actually the most troublesome ops were the US hams. I found this to be true when I operated in Europe also. Just some thoughts. Dan/W4NTI |
In article t,
Dan/W4NTI wrote: However, there is a viable alternative to ''running split''. That is selecting the calling stations by number (in their callsigh), or areas of the world, i.e. US Only, VE only, etc. However this requires the calling stations to PAY ATTENTION. Which apparantly is a rare commidity, especially amongt the US Stations. While working split is no replacement for good operating practice, on phone it's necessary on 80 and 40 meters for east-west dx. I don't have a choice, I can only transmit on 7000-7100, and while I can do it anywhere in that band, the low end is full of CW and 7070 up is full of digital signals. So the best place for me to call CQ is around 7050, but US hams cannot answer me. I have to "listen up" for you guys. 20 and 10 meters are the same here as the US, so I don't have the problem. The problem that I have is that except for contest weekends nobody seems to be out there. :-( Geoff. (N3OWJ/4X1GM) -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem Israel IL Voice: 972-544-608-069 IL Fax: 972-2-648-1443 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 I may be an old fart, but I'm a high-tech, up to date old fart. :-) |
"Geoffrey S. Mendelson" wrote in message ... In article t, Dan/W4NTI wrote: However, there is a viable alternative to ''running split''. That is selecting the calling stations by number (in their callsigh), or areas of the world, i.e. US Only, VE only, etc. However this requires the calling stations to PAY ATTENTION. Which apparantly is a rare commidity, especially amongt the US Stations. While working split is no replacement for good operating practice, on phone it's necessary on 80 and 40 meters for east-west dx. I don't have a choice, I can only transmit on 7000-7100, and while I can do it anywhere in that band, the low end is full of CW and 7070 up is full of digital signals. So the best place for me to call CQ is around 7050, but US hams cannot answer me. I have to "listen up" for you guys. 20 and 10 meters are the same here as the US, so I don't have the problem. The problem that I have is that except for contest weekends nobody seems to be out there. :-( Geoff. (N3OWJ/4X1GM) -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem Israel IL Voice: 972-544-608-069 IL Fax: 972-2-648-1443 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 I may be an old fart, but I'm a high-tech, up to date old fart. :-) \ Yep, that is the way it is. I have been on both ends of that circuit. Stateside and in Europe (Germany as DA2LJ in the 70s). But 40 will be better soon, if BPL don't wipe it out that is. Dan/W4NTI |
"Geoffrey S. Mendelson" wrote in message ... In article t, Dan/W4NTI wrote: [snip] 20 and 10 meters are the same here as the US, so I don't have the problem. The problem that I have is that except for contest weekends nobody seems to be out there. :-( Geoff. (N3OWJ/4X1GM) Are you sure you're calling at the right time of day? Anytime I hear a 4X1 station there's a pile up so deep that it takes real finesse to get through! If you don't want to deal with pileups, just answer one person and let everyone know that you are interested in a ragchew only. Or just wait and answer some one else's CQ although that does take a little patience as so many people just listen instead of call. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com