Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 17th 05, 06:23 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As a follow up question, what types of digital communication protocols
can a sound card NOT accomodate? I know if can do RTTY, PSK31, etc...
what about PACTOR? MFSK? G-TOR? etc?
Also, is any soundblaster sound card adequate?

Thanks!
Dave

  #2   Report Post  
Old January 17th 05, 07:25 PM
Dave Platt
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com,
wrote:

As a follow up question, what types of digital communication protocols
can a sound card NOT accomodate? I know if can do RTTY, PSK31, etc...
what about PACTOR? MFSK? G-TOR? etc?


MFSK is no problem (gMFSK software for Linux, and I'm sure there's
plenty of Windows software available). I believe that PACTOR is also
possible. The newer PACTOR modes are proprietary (or so I understand)
and I don't think there's a freely-available software implementation
yet. I believe that one of the goals behind the SCAMP project is to
create an open-standards (and eventually open-source) protocol with
bandwidth and robustness similar to those of the newer PACTOR variants.

You would not be able to use a soundmodem setup (or a TNC) plugged
into standard radio's audio output port and mic jack, for any digital
mode whose bandwidth exceeds about 2.5 kHz. Some of the newer modes
(e.g. the OFDM multi-carrier system used by Radio Mondial) exceed this
range, and require a different sort of feed arrangement from the radio
(e.g. tapping into or downmixing the final IF to a center frequency of
around 12 kHz).

Also, is any soundblaster sound card adequate?


For many of the simpler modes, I believe that any decent card with
16-bit sample I/O capability will probably suffice.

Some PCs (especially laptops) have only MIC inputs, not LINE inputs -
these would probably require a resistive padder to reduce the radio's
signal levels to those acceptable to a MIC input. Similarly, these
built-in sound interfaces may be "convenience grade" - acceptable for
teleconferencing, but with distortion or noise levels or frequency/phase
response variations too high for certain digital modes.

--
Dave Platt AE6EO
Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior
I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will
boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads!
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400 ­ June 11, 2004 Radionews General 0 June 16th 04 08:35 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1398 ­ May 28, 2004 Radionews General 0 May 28th 04 07:59 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 Radionews General 0 April 30th 04 05:47 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 April 30th 04 05:47 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 January 18th 04 09:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017