Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Richard Clark wrote: The standard rubber duck and a quarterwave are going to have the same failings: they both have the same response curve in space. Basically they both are designed to work with transmitters located at right angles to them. And if you stand in the conventional upright manner of a biped, then those antennas are going to be vertical with the favored direction lying along the horizon. Richard, Thanks for the advise. However, I thought 1/4 wave antennas were more isotropic than 'most' other antennas... (see link below) http://www.astrosurf.com/lombry/Radio/dipole-height.gif What am I missing? Basically, all I'm trying to do is increase the sensitivity of my handheld scanner for the 2m range. Thanks, Dave |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gain increase from scanner antenna to quarter-wave? | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Shortwave | |||
Antenna Advice | Shortwave | |||
Make your own T2FD | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave |