| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"nana" wrote in message ... http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/ You STILL don't get it do you? Try addressing what I am complaining about. Or can't you do so without spinning things way out of wack? ONE MORE TIME;;;;;;IT IS NOT HAM RADIO. IT IS INTERNET CONNECTED TO RADIO. DON'T CALL IT HAM RADIO. Dan/W4NTI There are mighty linked repeater networks across the USA. These are Ham Radio? If I choose to link two Ham Radio Repeaters via a landline - This isn't Ham Radio? Even though two Ham Radio service areas may be served? I've been using my computers on PSK31, but one is in the family room, connected to this computer via CAT5 cable, and then to my HF radio. Is this NOT Ham Radio? You guys have a very NARROW view of what constitutes Ham Radio. It appears that NOTHING less than a 100% Radio circuit is good enough for you, yet if you analyse systems around the world, MANY are not 100% Radio. Brad. First off....with your example of a repeater linked to another via land-line AND NOT VIA THE INTERNET THAT CAN BE ACCESSED BY OTHERS is perfectly fine. Narrow view or not. You sir, are attemting to confuse the issue and comparing Apples and Oranges. Sorry, that won't play. Again...stick on the subject. You know dang well what the differences are. If you don't then you need an education. Dan/W4NTI |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #697 | General | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Dx | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Dx | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | General | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Info | |||