LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old March 25th 05, 02:00 AM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Kate" wrote in message
...

"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Martin, VK2UMJ" wrote in message
...
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
k.net...

[SNIP]

Gawd Almighty you Ausies are a thick headed bunch, ain't ya?

Ham RADIO is communications with a RADIO or a RADIO system.

INTERNET is communications with a NETWORK of interconnected computers
organized in such a manner to send "packets" of data world-wide.

Do you see any mention of RADIO there?

Yes, as a matter of fact, because the correct name for IRLP is Internet
Radio Linking Project. See www.irlp.net Note that is a USA website
describing IRLP, not an Aussie site...

A quote from the irlp.net website:

"The aim of this project is to reliably and inexpensively link amateur
radio systems without the use of RF links, leased lines, or satellites."

So, next question?


--
Martin, VK2UMJ


Not a question, a statement. If it is linked by ANY means other than
radio, it is not ham radio. End of discussion.

Dan/W4NTI


So basically, what you're saying is that if you have a few repeaters
linked together by a landline, then those ham repeaters aren't ham radio?
Or if a club likes to control a repeater site via a phone line, then that
too isn't ham radio?

I used to be very active on the TCP/IP packet nets, using my VHF radio and
TNC to link to a gateway and on into the world wide converse net. Again,
the very thing you say isn't ham radio.

I'd say your definition is way too pure for the rest of us hobbyists, and
we'll all keep right on enjoying the part of our *hobby* that we find we
like the best, and if that just happens to be IRLP, Echolink, SSTV, CW,
ATV or whatever other mode/method then, sorry, that's the way it is. Deal
with it.

Kate vk4xyl


Your right to a point Kate. I'll give you that LL linking of repeaters are
indeed ham radio, so would be control of a repeater or say a remote base.
Thats also fine.

However using the internet where anyone on the net can access the system is
not ham radio. Its a radio connected to the WWW. Thats not ham radio.

I am not saying the idea and the system is not good, or it's bad. I'm
saying stop calling it ham radio. How about a new term...such as
INHAM....."Internet Ham" perhaps?

Dan/W4NTI


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #697 Tedd Mirgliotta General 0 February 13th 05 08:34 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 Tedd Mirgliotta Dx 2 October 25th 04 05:04 AM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 Tedd Mirgliotta Dx 0 October 24th 04 10:22 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 Tedd Mirgliotta General 0 October 24th 04 10:22 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 Tedd Mirgliotta Info 0 October 24th 04 10:22 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017