| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message ink.net... Your right to a point Kate. I'll give you that LL linking of repeaters are indeed ham radio, so would be control of a repeater or say a remote base. Thats also fine. However using the internet where anyone on the net can access the system is not ham radio. Its a radio connected to the WWW. Thats not ham radio. Again, you are mistaken at this point Dan. No-one on the net can access the IRLP system via the internet. It is NOT a radio connected to the WWW, it is indeed the LL linking of repeaters and simplex radios using a digital protocol. Check your facts. Don't confuse it with Echolink. Brad. I am not saying the idea and the system is not good, or it's bad. I'm saying stop calling it ham radio. How about a new term...such as INHAM....."Internet Ham" perhaps? Dan/W4NTI |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #697 | General | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Dx | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Dx | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | General | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Info | |||