LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old March 25th 05, 03:49 AM
nana
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
ink.net...
Your right to a point Kate. I'll give you that LL linking of repeaters
are indeed ham radio, so would be control of a repeater or say a remote
base. Thats also fine.

However using the internet where anyone on the net can access the system
is not ham radio. Its a radio connected to the WWW. Thats not ham radio.


Again, you are mistaken at this point Dan. No-one on the net can access the
IRLP system via the internet. It is NOT a radio connected to the WWW, it is
indeed the LL linking of repeaters and simplex radios using a digital
protocol. Check your facts. Don't confuse it with Echolink.

Brad.


I am not saying the idea and the system is not good, or it's bad. I'm
saying stop calling it ham radio. How about a new term...such as
INHAM....."Internet Ham" perhaps?

Dan/W4NTI



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #697 Tedd Mirgliotta General 0 February 13th 05 08:34 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 Tedd Mirgliotta Dx 2 October 25th 04 05:04 AM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 Tedd Mirgliotta Dx 0 October 24th 04 10:22 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 Tedd Mirgliotta General 0 October 24th 04 10:22 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 Tedd Mirgliotta Info 0 October 24th 04 10:22 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017