Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris Kirby" wrote in message ... "nana" wrote: The IRLP CANNOT be accessed by others. It is STRICTLY designed for radio to radio access only. ECHOLINK can be accessed by others and is NOT the topic of conversation. Just for the record, everyone on Echolink (links and individuals alike) have been validated by one of the Echolink validation team. I'm not sure that it is really necessary, but it happens. So, like it or not, there's very little chance of a non-licenced person using Echolink. ... and (lest we forget) what does it really matter anyway? ... This is a hobby. There are authorities whose job it is to ensure only those with licences transmit. We are just end users of the service. I for one don't really care whether the chap at the other end actually has a licence or not providing he sounds and behaves like a radio amateur. I will not hesitate to talk to someone who gives a callsign and sounds like an amateur. I pay my licence, and leave it to the authorities to sort out if he is bona fide or not. Here, we pay to renew our licences every year. How is someone supposed to know whether someone who was a bona fide amateur has paid for the forthcoming year. Of course, we don't know, but if he behaves like an amateur, we assume he is licenced. 73, -- Chris Now that is a fine attitude. You basically don't give a dang if the guy/gal has a ticket, eh? Well I do. Course I must be wrong, right? Dan/W4NTI |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
k.net... "Chris Kirby" wrote in message ... "nana" wrote: The IRLP CANNOT be accessed by others. It is STRICTLY designed for radio to radio access only. ECHOLINK can be accessed by others and is NOT the topic of conversation. Just for the record, everyone on Echolink (links and individuals alike) have been validated by one of the Echolink validation team. I'm not sure that it is really necessary, but it happens. So, like it or not, there's very little chance of a non-licenced person using Echolink. ... and (lest we forget) what does it really matter anyway? ... This is a hobby. There are authorities whose job it is to ensure only those with licences transmit. We are just end users of the service. I for one don't really care whether the chap at the other end actually has a licence or not providing he sounds and behaves like a radio amateur. I will not hesitate to talk to someone who gives a callsign and sounds like an amateur. I pay my licence, and leave it to the authorities to sort out if he is bona fide or not. Here, we pay to renew our licences every year. How is someone supposed to know whether someone who was a bona fide amateur has paid for the forthcoming year. Of course, we don't know, but if he behaves like an amateur, we assume he is licenced. 73, -- Chris Now that is a fine attitude. You basically don't give a dang if the guy/gal has a ticket, eh? Well I do. Course I must be wrong, right? Dan/W4NTI No, that is one point I will fully agree with you on. Every amateur has a right, and duty, to help keep the hobby 'pirate free'. Anyone that thinks their respective authority (FCC, OffComm, ACA, etc) has the resources to keep a watch on amateur bands for unlicensed operators (or on any other frequency) is dreaming - they rely on reports from licensed stations to track down such users. This is why amateur radio has always been "self regulating" in most countries. -- Martin, VK2UMJ To reply by e-mail, replace ".invalid" with ".com.au" Windows 95 was unable to detect a keyboard. Press F1 to continue, or F3 to exit. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #697 | General | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | General | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Info |