Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
k.net... "Martin, VK2UMJ" wrote in message ... "Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message ink.net... [SNIP] You *MUST* be a licensed Amateur to use IRLP, you *MUST* use a radio to access IRLP. Therefore it is getting *LICENSED AMATEURS* on air. It in *NO* way interferes with your on air activities so leave it alone and enjoy your hobby without *INTERFERING* with others. -- The views I present are my own and NOT of any organisation I belong to. 73 de Simon, VK3XEM. http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/cli...IENT_NO=157452 VoIP http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/ How is that "LICENSE" proven? Who or what checks it? How is that done? Dan/W4NTI The same way any valid licence is checked when you use any ham frequency - by "self regulation". Using IRLP is no different than firing up on your local repeater that is linked to some other repeater in the distance. There is the exact same potential for unlicensed users on IRLP as there is on any other amateur frequency, no more, no less. Yet you don't seem to be claiming that 2m is open to CBers, or that 40m is not a valid ham band..... If you accept that linking amateur repeaters via land line is OK, then you have no basis upon which to reject IRLP - it is the same, linking repeaters via land lines, except it uses internet technology to make that affordable for anyone rather than the expense of a dedicated leased line.. Without the VOiP linking repeaters by landline can be rather costly, so the number of repeaters you could link would be limited. Now that expense has been removed so that any local club, or local ham, can establish a node and allow the repeater to be linked to any one of thousands of other ham repeaters worldwide. Seems that all they have done is expand existing technology - isn't that what ham radio is all about?????? Then again, we faced this kind of narrow minded, arrogant discrimination when they proposed access to amateur frequencies by operators that hadn't learnt CW... Seems it is just another example of the old timers stomping their feet because times are changing - must've been real hard when valves were replaced! -- Martin, VK2UMJ To reply by e-mail, replace ".invalid" with ".com.au" "I cannot help but notice that there is no problem between us that cannot be solved by your departure." You may indeed be correct....I am confusing IRLP with echolink......I think I'll go on google and see what others have to say about it. Dan/W4NTI IRLP - www.irlp.net EchoLink - www.echolink.org They are two totally different concepts. IRLP only links radio/repeater to radio/repeater. Echolink lets you link PC to PC, PC to radio/repeater or radio/repeater to PC. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #697 | General | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | General | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Info |