"ZZZZPK " .es.it.net
wrote in message ...
ye gods!

another excuse.

You'd better start writing yours now. At the rate you come up with critical
errors, even if you started posting corrections now, you wouldn't finish
within your lifetime.

--
73s de Walter R.

On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:10:47 +0000, Walt Davidson wrote:

On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 20:05:46 +1100, "Martin, VK2UMJ"
wrote:

Yes, as a matter of fact, because the correct name for IRLP is Internet
Radio Linking Project. See www.irlp.net Note that is a USA website
describing IRLP, not an Aussie site...

A quote from the irlp.net website:

"The aim of this project is to reliably and inexpensively link amateur radio
systems without the use of RF links, leased lines, or satellites."

^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Without the use of RF links".

The full name for "RF" is "Radio Frequency".

So that rules out radio, then.

Only if there's no radio link anywhere. Otherwise, by your own
logic, any amateur using a microphone connected to a radio (ie
a non-RF link) isn't really engaged in Amateur Radio. An absurd
argument to prop up absurd logic.

VK2TUM

Next question?

So, next question?

73 de G3NYY

--
Stephen Quigg

"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
et...

"Simon VK3XEM" wrote in message
...


Get over it! Go back to your CW if you want, who bothers you or bags you
for using it, I know I certainly don't.


--
The views I present are my own and NOT of any organisation I belong to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/cli...IENT_NO=157452
VoIP http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/

Thanks for bringing this up Mate!.

My major problem is folks refering to interconnecting "hams" over the
internet as "ham radio". Ham radio is R A D I O . Not INTERNET
connected to Nodes then to a radio somewhere. Call it whatever you want,
but it is NOT ham radio.

Dan/W4NTI


does this also mean we cannot place the receiver
for 10M some distance away(1Km) to stop desensitisng
the receiver as the of set is narrow, the receiver and
transmitter are connected by landline ?????????.

Alf VK5ZKL

"wonderer" wrote in message
...

"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
et...

"Simon VK3XEM" wrote in message
...


Get over it! Go back to your CW if you want, who bothers you or bags you
for using it, I know I certainly don't.


--
The views I present are my own and NOT of any organisation I belong to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/cli...IENT_NO=157452
VoIP http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/

Thanks for bringing this up Mate!.

My major problem is folks refering to interconnecting "hams" over the
internet as "ham radio". Ham radio is R A D I O . Not INTERNET
connected to Nodes then to a radio somewhere. Call it whatever you want,
but it is NOT ham radio.

Dan/W4NTI


does this also mean we cannot place the receiver
for 10M some distance away(1Km) to stop desensitisng
the receiver as the of set is narrow, the receiver and
transmitter are connected by landline ?????????.

Alf VK5ZKL

Dans' main problem was that he did not fully (or even partly) understand the
operation of IRLP and the security systems designed to prevent access. I
don't think he understood Echolink either and had the two confused as being
one and the same animal.

Walt was just plain ignorant.


Brad.

"nana" wrote in message
...

"wonderer" wrote in message
...

"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
et...

"Simon VK3XEM" wrote in message
...


Get over it! Go back to your CW if you want, who bothers you or bags
you for using it, I know I certainly don't.


--
The views I present are my own and NOT of any organisation I belong to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/cli...IENT_NO=157452
VoIP http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/

Thanks for bringing this up Mate!.

My major problem is folks refering to interconnecting "hams" over the
internet as "ham radio". Ham radio is R A D I O . Not INTERNET
connected to Nodes then to a radio somewhere. Call it whatever you
want, but it is NOT ham radio.

Dan/W4NTI


does this also mean we cannot place the receiver
for 10M some distance away(1Km) to stop desensitisng
the receiver as the of set is narrow, the receiver and
transmitter are connected by landline ?????????.

Alf VK5ZKL

Dans' main problem was that he did not fully (or even partly) understand
the operation of IRLP and the security systems designed to prevent access.
I don't think he understood Echolink either and had the two confused as
being one and the same animal.

Walt was just plain ignorant.


Brad.

Correct....in fact I think IRLP is the best choice if one is going to use
any form of internet with ham radio.

Dan/W4NTI

"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
k.net...

"nana" wrote in message
...

"wonderer" wrote in message
...

"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
et...

"Simon VK3XEM" wrote in message
...


Get over it! Go back to your CW if you want, who bothers you or bags
you for using it, I know I certainly don't.


--
The views I present are my own and NOT of any organisation I belong
to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/cli...IENT_NO=157452
VoIP http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/

Thanks for bringing this up Mate!.

My major problem is folks refering to interconnecting "hams" over the
internet as "ham radio". Ham radio is R A D I O . Not INTERNET
connected to Nodes then to a radio somewhere. Call it whatever you
want, but it is NOT ham radio.

Dan/W4NTI


does this also mean we cannot place the receiver
for 10M some distance away(1Km) to stop desensitisng
the receiver as the of set is narrow, the receiver and
transmitter are connected by landline ?????????.

Alf VK5ZKL

Dans' main problem was that he did not fully (or even partly) understand
the operation of IRLP and the security systems designed to prevent
access. I don't think he understood Echolink either and had the two
confused as being one and the same animal.

Walt was just plain ignorant.


Brad.

Correct....in fact I think IRLP is the best choice if one is going to use
any form of internet with ham radio.

Dan/W4NTI

Yayyyy!!!!!!!!!

Brad.

"Walter Raleigh" wrote:

:
: "ZZZPK " .es.it.net wrote
: in message ...
: DEOTH
:
: Ah yes, one typo, on an unfamiliar lap-top keyboard, quickly corrected in a
: follow up post, as opposed to a decade of pseudo-dyslexic repetitive
: drivel. I think you've beaten me there....sigh!. Incidentally, I don't use
: a spell-checker, perhaps you need to try it.



Dear Dear "Walter" ( or whatever your real name is )

Since we're on the suject of SPELLCHECKERS




= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
From: "Walter Raleigh"
Subject: Ham Radio Deluxe v1.4 build425b now available
Message-ID:
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:00:05 +0100

"Starr" wrote in message
...
Your welcome but i have something that doesn't seem to work but it's
probably something i'm doing wrong. when you user the mapper, you can add
stations to the database. I open the box, type the callsign in and click,
"add" then the text wntry box clears and i close the box. when i go to edit
stations thiere are none in the database.

Other than that, lovely software. Did you write it in Visual Basic? (if you
don't mind me asking)

Did your teachers ever visualise you posessing basic spelling/grammar
skills?


--
Seachtó a trí

Walter R.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =



http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=posessing

No entry found for posessing.







No doubt it was ANOTHER keyboard problem ( or some other squirmy excuse )

BWWWWWwwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh hhhhhhhhhhhh !!!







Have a really really nice day "Walter" ( or whatever your name is )


**_END_**