| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
You could be right, sigh. I feel a little guilty for doing it this
way, but if the FCC says it's good, then who am I to argue. Besides, I bet a few of them couldn't pass the new element 3. I took it in 1978-9 timeframe, and it's a new ballgame. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Who Can Have A US License? Sequential Calls? | Policy | |||
| FCC resumes issuing calls. | Policy | |||
| The Pool | Policy | |||
| If Ham radio were invented today........ | Policy | |||
| FCC Vanity Call Sign Dispute | Policy | |||