Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Traina" wrote in message oups.com... You could be right, sigh. I feel a little guilty for doing it this way, but if the FCC says it's good, then who am I to argue. Besides, I bet a few of them couldn't pass the new element 3. I took it in 1978-9 timeframe, and it's a new ballgame. No need to feel guilty. Besides if look at the history of licensing the earliest requirements were only 5wpm on code. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Who Can Have A US License? Sequential Calls? | Policy | |||
FCC resumes issuing calls. | Policy | |||
The Pool | Policy | |||
If Ham radio were invented today........ | Policy | |||
FCC Vanity Call Sign Dispute | Policy |