"Bob Sherin, W4ASX" wrote in message
oups.com...
Yes Dan, amazing how so much gets imputed to the controversial, much of
which is totally untrue. Then, before you know it, conclusions are
built on the false information.

It gets so bad that a suedo podia is formed (a new false position) that
is attributed, and everyone jumps on the bandwagon. So, with everyone
rushing so quickly to judgement, there is more misinformation here than
information.

Fellow hams, let's change all that.

Bob Sherin, W4ASX



You had your chance to make a difference. You turned down
the opportunity of being Roger's mentor, when it was offered to
you.

BTW, what is a "suedo podia"?

In article
"Noballs whiny **** Davies" whined:

You had

Poor whiny **** Lardass Lloyd Austin Davies, (N0VP)Nadless Zero Vaginal
Faced Pussy, he has to get others to fight his battles for him. What a
pussy!


BTW, what is a "suedo podia"?

What's the matter, Lardass, did Bob use words your tiny little pea
brain couldn't know because they weren't from "Dr. Who" or "Star Trek,"
you mentally ill genetic reject and fired pizza BOY?

"Nomen Neseco" wrote in message
...

"Bob Sherin, W4ASX" wrote in message
oups.com...
Yes Dan, amazing how so much gets imputed to the controversial, much of
which is totally untrue. Then, before you know it, conclusions are
built on the false information.

It gets so bad that a suedo podia is formed (a new false position) that
is attributed, and everyone jumps on the bandwagon. So, with everyone
rushing so quickly to judgement, there is more misinformation here than
information.

Fellow hams, let's change all that.

Bob Sherin, W4ASX



You had your chance to make a difference. You turned down
the opportunity of being Roger's mentor, when it was offered to
you.

BTW, what is a "suedo podia"?
/
Someone with a false foot fetish?

Lawyers use the term. Suedo podia means false position. In law it
isn't taken as necessary false but an alteration of the original
position.

Here's how it's used. A plaintiff, say, pleads a contract against you
when its existence is by no means certain. You plead back that no
contract exists but there was a relationship and you've been damaged in
tort.

So, it is kind of a dance where you position your opponent to be slayed
by your arguments.

Bob Sherin, W4ASX

How come it does not appear in Black's Law Dictionary?




"Bob Sherin, W4ASX" wrote in message
ups.com...
Lawyers use the term. Suedo podia means false position. In law it
isn't taken as necessary false but an alteration of the original
position.

Here's how it's used. A plaintiff, say, pleads a contract against you
when its existence is by no means certain. You plead back that no
contract exists but there was a relationship and you've been damaged in
tort.

So, it is kind of a dance where you position your opponent to be slayed
by your arguments.

Bob Sherin, W4ASX

Anon wrote:
How come it does not appear in Black's Law Dictionary?

Because you can't read it with your head up your fat ass like that.


"Bob Sherin, W4ASX" wrote in message
ups.com...
Lawyers use the term. Suedo podia means false position. In law it
isn't taken as necessary false but an alteration of the original
position.

Here's how it's used. A plaintiff, say, pleads a contract against you
when its existence is by no means certain. You plead back that no
contract exists but there was a relationship and you've been damaged in
tort.

So, it is kind of a dance where you position your opponent to be slayed
by your arguments.

Bob Sherin, W4ASX

It appears Bob is misusing the term. In another string in this
group, Wayne Mackleroy appears to properly identify it as
a biological term. The term cannot be found in Black's
Law Dictionary.


Clarance



"Anon" wrote in message
...

How come it does not appear in Black's Law Dictionary?




"Bob Sherin, W4ASX" wrote in message
ups.com...
Lawyers use the term. Suedo podia means false position. In law it
isn't taken as necessary false but an alteration of the original
position.

Here's how it's used. A plaintiff, say, pleads a contract against you
when its existence is by no means certain. You plead back that no
contract exists but there was a relationship and you've been damaged in
tort.

So, it is kind of a dance where you position your opponent to be slayed
by your arguments.

Bob Sherin, W4ASX

Just saw this post, Clarence, and jumped to it since you discovered a
misstatement. At all times, I want to be as accurate and
authoritative as possible. When it turns out wrong, the mistake needs
to be ballyhooed.

First, naturally I spelled what I wanted to say wrong. Suedo is, of
course, spelled correctly, pseudo. It is in Black's, meaning "false."
So far, so good, but here's where I get into trouble. Podia is
apparently a biological term meaning feet. My notion that podia meant
position is wrong. If it means feet, then my usage needs a further
explanation lest anyone think I'm phony.

Much of my legal education came from my Father, born in 1898, deceased
in 1988. He grew up on Latin and the common law. Psuedo podia is a
term he used and I imitated, assuming its meaning as false position.

I find it nowhere current in relation to the law. But it isn't unusual
that Dad used terms grounded in an earlier era that are no longer used.
Yet no longer in Black's is hard to fathom. Another word he taught
was demurrer, a legal term no longer used but very much in Black's.

And so, I misused a term, and this reply is to set the record straight.
Clarence, thanks for your astute follow-up.

Bob Sherin, W4ASX

"Bob Sherin, W4ASX" wrote in message
oups.com...
Just saw this post, Clarence, and jumped to it since you discovered a
misstatement//////////SNIPPED/////////////



BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH
BLAH BLAH BLAH................ad nauseam