Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: Dr.Ace - WH2T wrote: Freedom of speech means I have the right to say if I think someone's posts are ignorant, stupid, or just plain wrong. your point? if any you clearly don't respect the rights of others to disagree with you so you talk the talk, but when you going to walk the walk? So... Work keeps me out of RRAP for a couple of weeks and I "return" only to find those who accuse me of certain things being waist-deep in it themselves. what are you talking about? another hurricane relief mission Stevie Guess you weren't paying attention to references, were you, Mark? And I can see your English comprehension skills have not improved. no they haven't but then they are pretty good cuting the rep What part of the concept of "work" do you not understand? work wasn't the subject but then you can't read BTW, Mark, He DID clearly "respect" your right to "disagree" with you...He just called your posts for what they (usually) are..."ignroant, stupid, or just plain wrong" and YOU were the one with the "disagreement" issues...Again. you haven't been reading the man's posts he doesn't respect people's right to disagree, he like you resorts to name calling And you're any different? One he was the subject so stop diverting it You're showing exactly NO difference, Mark... again go read some of stuff first Both of you confuse disagreement with stupidity, meaning neither of you repsect the rights of other to disagree "respect" Sure I do. That you're alive despite several years of whining about death threats is proof positive that I "respect disagreement". not at all but you don't know the meaning of the word proof as you have amply proven over the years His "point" was that he clearly shares the same opinion as other educated and informed men about YOUR "points". gee where are these men and only men you say Certainly not in Michigan. vague as is normal for you and evasive as ever As for "talking the talk but not walking the walk", when are we gonna see you in "uniform", "Colonel"...?!?! more nonsense Stevie Not at all. You claim to be a veteran AND an Officer to boot. Obviously NONE of it true, ergo you're talking the talk, but can't walk the walk. Obviously? gee then why do I have a DD 214 with my name on it but you can't deal with issues that alwasy your problem "always" Sure I can. when you going to start then At least the countless spelling lessons I gave you appear to have paid off. bull#### Nope. I only had to correct you twice in this post, none in the previous. Obviously it's worn off. meaning you claim is in fact bull**** as I said and back to disrespecting intelectual porperty again Steve, K4YZ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() nobodys old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: Dr.Ace - WH2T wrote: Freedom of speech means I have the right to say if I think someone's posts are ignorant, stupid, or just plain wrong. your point? if any you clearly don't respect the rights of others to disagree with you so you talk the talk, but when you going to walk the walk? So... Work keeps me out of RRAP for a couple of weeks and I "return" only to find those who accuse me of certain things being waist-deep in it themselves. what are you talking about? another hurricane relief mission Stevie Guess you weren't paying attention to references, were you, Mark? And I can see your English comprehension skills have not improved. no they haven't but then they are pretty good No, they are not. The above quoted paragraph is evidence thereof. cuting the rep You mean conducting censorship. What part of the concept of "work" do you not understand? work wasn't the subject but then you can't read Sure I can read. I said: "Work keeps me out of RRAP for a couple of weeks and I "return" only to find those who accuse me of certain things being waist-deep in it themselves." You said: "what are you talking about? another hurricane relief mission Stevie" Therefore you've opened your mouth, allowed the REAL "bs" of this NG to spew forth again, and then rused to get your shoes off so you could dance barefoot in it for a while. No, I was not talking about hurricaine releif, although we are seeing plenty of dislocated folks in my ER in the last 3 weeks. BTW, Mark, He DID clearly "respect" your right to "disagree" with you...He just called your posts for what they (usually) are..."ignroant, stupid, or just plain wrong" and YOU were the one with the "disagreement" issues...Again. you haven't been reading the man's posts he doesn't respect people's right to disagree, he like you resorts to name calling And you're any different? One he was the subject so stop diverting it I'm not diverting anything. You're showing exactly NO difference, Mark... again go read some of stuff first I did. Lot's of it. And what I see is that YOU are perpetrating the exact same deceit, misconduct and verbal trashing of the NG you accuse others of. Both of you confuse disagreement with stupidity, meaning neither of you repsect the rights of other to disagree "respect" Sure I do. That you're alive despite several years of whining about death threats is proof positive that I "respect disagreement". not at all but you don't know the meaning of the word proof as you have amply proven over the years Sure I do. I've provided lots of it. And everytime I DO, someone such as yourself wants something ELSE as "proof". If you and spineless creeps like Frankie of Silliland want to play on that merry- His "point" was that he clearly shares the same opinion as other educated and informed men about YOUR "points". gee where are these men and only men you say Certainly not in Michigan. vague as is normal for you and evasive as ever Not evasive or vague at all. I am saying none of the men he's refering to are in Michigan. As for "talking the talk but not walking the walk", when are we gonna see you in "uniform", "Colonel"...?!?! more nonsense Stevie Not at all. You claim to be a veteran AND an Officer to boot. Obviously NONE of it true, ergo you're talking the talk, but can't walk the walk. Obviously? gee then why do I have a DD 214 with my name on it I have a picture of a "Hollywood Star" with my name on it too, Mark...Nice for gags. but you can't deal with issues that alwasy your problem "always" Sure I can. when you going to start then Already have. At least the countless spelling lessons I gave you appear to have paid off. bull#### Nope. I only had to correct you twice in this post, none in the previous. Obviously it's worn off. meaning you claim is in fact bull#### as I said Nope. I believe you are suffering from the "anger" aspect of newsgroup psoting that Lennie refers to. Obviously, in your case, it works. And you were doing sooooooooooooooooo good. and back to disrespecting intelectual porperty again If you're going to refer to intellectual ANYthing, please spell it correctly. "intellectual" "property" There's nothing of YOURS that even remotely approaches "intellectual property", Mark. Steve, K4YZ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: cut "intellectual" "property" There's nothing of YOURS that even remotely approaches "intellectual property", Mark. Everything I write is my intellectual property everything more proof that Stevie does not respect the law Steve, K4YZ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: cut "intellectual" "property" There's nothing of YOURS that even remotely approaches "intellectual property", Mark. Everything I write is my intellectual property I think the word "intellectual" is streatching it quite a bit. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You don't have ownership rights to the BS you write unless it is
copyrighted. Ace - WH2T "an_old_friend of Todd" wrote in message ups.com... K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: cut "intellectual" "property" There's nothing of YOURS that even remotely approaches "intellectual property", Mark. Everything I write is my intellectual property everything more proof that Stevie does not respect the law Steve, K4YZ |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dr.Ace - WH2T wrote: You don't have ownership rights to the BS you write unless it is copyrighted. Ace - WH2T Wrong ace I do |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK , I'm sure you do.
Just everybody else needs a copyright. Ace - WH2T "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dr.Ace - WH2T wrote: You don't have ownership rights to the BS you write unless it is copyrighted. Ace - WH2T Wrong ace I do |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dr.Ace - WH2T wrote: OK , I'm sure you do. Just everybody else needs a copyright. no you don't your word are your property too as are Stveies and everyone else Ace - WH2T "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dr.Ace - WH2T wrote: You don't have ownership rights to the BS you write unless it is copyrighted. Ace - WH2T Wrong ace I do |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|