Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #91   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 05, 02:41 AM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default What Amateur Radio Emergency Communications?

I don't talk with brain damaged idiots. I just comment about their dumb ass
comments.

Dan/W4NTI

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 22:17:13 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI"
wrote:


"TOM" wrote in message
...
The future of the National Traffic System
http://www.eham.net/articles/12198

[snip]
For those of you who may not know, the National Traffic System (NTS)
consists of a carefully choreographed collection of section, region, and
area nets designed to relay messages throughout the US. In a sense it's
the
second "R" in ARRL. NTS has a long and honorable history and has some of
the
best operators in the world as its membership.

The recent hurricane season has raised serious doubts for me about the
role
that NTS plays in the current ham-radio environment. I did not hear a
single
health-and-welfare message during the disasters. In bygone times, NTS
would
have been buzzing with activity.
[snip]


Tom,

I hate to break your ham hating crusade but the NTS can't run any traffic,
if none is sent to it.


meaning you are greing with me and Tom

why is it ham hating if you say and ham hating if I do

you also make my point no vital traffic can be passed by ham radio if
it was not sent to ham radio

I had the exact same complaint. I did manage to
handle a few messages, but NOTHING like I was expecting.


which brings you to stating the same thing I was

I have since found that the American Red Cross, for WHATEVER REASON
decided
that ham radio was not good enough to use. Other than for a VHF Telephone
network between shelters that is.


which is a dangerous state of affairs for one of the supports that we
use in our spectrum battles

but you were unwilling to even discuss such things


Not our bad Tom. We were there, ready, willing, and able.


maybe we were maybe we were not, but it seems whatever the truth were
not seen as ready willing and able, and the preception of the served
agencies is more important than the reality

Dan/W4NTI


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account



  #92   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 05, 02:42 AM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default What Amateur Radio Emergency Communications?

You got that right Dr. Ace. I've been a SATERN member for a while now. Did
some work up on 14.265. Great group of folks.

Dan/W4NTI

"Dr.Ace" wrote in message
...
SATERN = SALVATION ARMY TEAM EMERGENCY RADIO NETWORK

http://www.satern.org/

What We Do
Emergency communications etc. etc.
-----------------------------------------
LAT exposé: "The Red Cross money pit" - The TRUTH at last!!!
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/9/25/95628/8554

-----------------------------------------

It has always been my personal opinion that the Salvation Army is a
MUCH better organization than the Red Cross / Red Crescent . Organizations
like the Red Cross / Red Crescent have enormous overhead, including
high-paid executives and posh offices.

Ace - WH2T



"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
link.net...

"TOM" wrote in message
...
The future of the National Traffic System
http://www.eham.net/articles/12198

[snip]
For those of you who may not know, the National Traffic System (NTS)
consists of a carefully choreographed collection of section, region, and
area nets designed to relay messages throughout the US. In a sense it's
the
second "R" in ARRL. NTS has a long and honorable history and has some of
the
best operators in the world as its membership.

The recent hurricane season has raised serious doubts for me about the
role
that NTS plays in the current ham-radio environment. I did not hear a
single
health-and-welfare message during the disasters. In bygone times, NTS
would
have been buzzing with activity.
[snip]


Tom,

I hate to break your ham hating crusade but the NTS can't run any
traffic, if none is sent to it. I had the exact same complaint. I did
manage to handle a few messages, but NOTHING like I was expecting.

I have since found that the American Red Cross, for WHATEVER REASON
decided that ham radio was not good enough to use. Other than for a VHF
Telephone network between shelters that is.

Not our bad Tom. We were there, ready, willing, and able.

Dan/W4NTI






  #93   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 05, 02:45 AM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default What Amateur Radio Emergency Communications?

LOL....thats good Mike.

Dan/W4NTI

"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
...
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
...

Ernie wrote:

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote in message
...


TOM wrote:


To continue the thread...

'ARRL Publishing Empire LLC' looses again and Ham radio operator couch
potatoes watch TV...

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/10/prweb293047.htm

[snip]
HARTFORD, CT (PRWEB) Oct 6, 2005 - In the aftermath of Hurricane

Katrina,


it's become clear that a major contributing factor to the tragic loss
of
life was the near total breakdown of communication systems. Once
electricity, telephone, and cell phone services failed, people were

unable


to let rescuers know of their dire situations -- and died as a result.

What could be a simple, instant, and virtually zero-cost solution?

"Establish a National SOS Radio Network (www.NationalSOS.com)," says

Eric


Knight, CEO of UP Aerospace, Inc. (www.upaerospace.com). "There are

millions


of 'Family Radio Service' or 'FRS' radios already in use by the public

for


camping, boating, and hiking, and there are 675,000 licensed ham radio
operators in America -- people renown and prepared for emergency
communications. The output frequencies of FRS radios are easily
received

by


the radio gear ham radio operators use daily. That's the magic link in

this


emergency communication strategy."

Knight went on to say, "The best part of a National SOS Radio Network
is
that it wouldn't require new laws or any new legislation whatsoever.
It
could go into effect, today. Once the ham radio community is made
aware

to


listen for the public's emergency broadcasts on an FRS frequency, the
national network will be up and running. It's as simple as that."
[snip]

So... it will be the FRS that will respond to the needs of a national
frequency for emergency communications and not the amateur

community---lets


see you blame that on the loss of telegraphy.

TOM



You obviously have a reading comprehension problem. Notice it states
that the hams will listen for emergency traffic on the FRS frequencies
and FRS will be the link to the ham radio network.


Let me see now... I have a reading comprehension problem... There are
MILLIONS of FRS users compared to 675,000 couch potatoes. What makes
you
think that the proposal for a National SOS Radio Network is going to
make
any changes to Amateur Radio Service response to national disasters?
APPARENTLY, AMATEUR SERVICE FAILED TO MEET THE NEEDS OF A NATIONAL
RESPONSE
TO DISASTER COMMUNICATIONS IN THE FIRST PLACE---THAT'S WHY FRS IS GOING
TO
TAKE THE PLACE OF THE AMATEUR SERVICE!


And millions more cell phone users. Let the cell phone users make up the
emergency network, eh?

- Mike KB3EIA -



Amazing how some minds can get things so out of phase, isn't it? hi.

I wonder how this FRS service with toy radio's is going to talk past the
end of their block?


I think the idea is that person 1 transmits to the end of his block, then
person 2 transmits to the end of their block. And so on and so on. Be just
like the olde days when the "relay" meant something in ARRL. They will
need every one of those "millions" of FRS radio owners.



Oh with that useless ham stuff? On Vhf/Uhf.....uh....Oh I get it, FRS
and V/UHF ham radio will be the emergency channel and then carrier pigeon
will take care of the long haul stuff.

One thing about it....Ya just cain't fix stupid.


Just like trying to polish a turd.....

- Mike KB3EIA -



  #94   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 05, 02:46 AM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default What Amateur Radio Emergency Communications?


"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
...
an_old_friend wrote:

a decent case can be made that the USA should sell of all ham VHF/UHF
spectrum and use the money to build more redunacy in to the cell tower
network so at text will get through no matter what


Unrelated.


Ignorant, and ridiculous. Typical Markie.

Dan/W4NTI


  #95   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 05, 02:48 AM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default What Amateur Radio Emergency Communications?


wrote in message
...
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:32:01 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

a decent case can be made that the USA should sell of all ham VHF/UHF
spectrum and use the money to build more redunacy in to the cell tower
network so at text will get through no matter what


Unrelated.


liar

to restore yourown words " And millions more cell phone users.
Let the cell phone users make up the emergency network, eh?"

Cell phone does indeed show signs of being usable as a true emergency
network

certainly one more acceable to general public than Ham radio

this fact is one we need to consider if we wnat to surive

but then you like the procoders in general do have your heads in the
sand



Everybody is WRONG, I am right. My name is MARKIE. And if you not wrong
then you are a LIAR. My name is MARKIE. A world class goof.

Dan/W4NTI
(Markie made me do it)_________________________________________




  #96   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 05, 02:48 AM
an_old_friend
 
Posts: n/a
Default What Amateur Radio Emergency Communications?


Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"Cmdr Buzz Corey" wrote in message
m...
TOM wrote:
I did not hear a single
health-and-welfare message during the disasters. In bygone times, NTS
would
have been buzzing with activity.
[snip]


Try turning your receiver on next time, I heard lots of H&W traffic during
Katrina and Rita.


I think he will respond with "not on the National Traffic System". And he
would be right. I heard lots of "traffic" on the designated emergency nets.
Although most of that was not formatted properly (as in NTS format).


who peed in your cherrois tonight Dan?

Dan/W4NTI


  #97   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 05, 02:48 AM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default What Amateur Radio Emergency Communications?

Everybody is a LIAR and everybody is WRONG. My name is Markie.

Dan/W4NTI

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:22:50 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:32:01 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:


a decent case can be made that the USA should sell of all ham VHF/UHF
spectrum and use the money to build more redunacy in to the cell tower
network so at text will get through no matter what

Unrelated.


liar



You toss the "liar" pejorative around when someone voices an opinion,


you did not voice an opinion

you falsely stated that my post was unrelated

and you tell people to shut up when they express an opinion.

Good for you, Mr Morgan. Not much point in having a discussion with ya.


you were obviously never interested in one

- Mike KB3EIA -



_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account



  #98   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 05, 02:51 AM
an_old_friend
 
Posts: n/a
Default What Amateur Radio Emergency Communications?


Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
...
an_old_friend wrote:

a decent case can be made that the USA should sell of all ham VHF/UHF
spectrum and use the money to build more redunacy in to the cell tower
network so at text will get through no matter what


Unrelated.


Ignorant, and ridiculous. Typical Markie.


typical Danny boy no content just dismiss anything outside his horizion

the cell phone kept carry text message though out Katrina and the after
math recharging cell phone batteries became a challange but the are
ways of course

but then Danny has never wanted to take part in any discussion where he
does set the ground rules one of which is that everyone must agree in
adavnce to agree with him

Dan/W4NTI


  #99   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 05, 04:58 AM
LRod
 
Posts: n/a
Default What Amateur Radio Emergency Communications?

On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 21:37:41 -0700, Cmdr Buzz Corey
wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:


the cell phone kept carry text message though out Katrina and the after
math recharging cell phone batteries became a challange but the are
ways of course


There was no cell coverage in NO after Katrina hit. Text message uses
the same cell towers as voice, if those systems are down, you don't text
message either. In situations were the signal is spotty or week, text
messages may get through when voice will not because the text messages
are sent in short packets.


Aw, don't confuse him with facts...

--
LRod

Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite

Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999

http://www.woodbutcher.net

Proud participant of rec.woodworking since February, 1997
  #100   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 05, 05:15 AM
Cmdr Buzz Corey
 
Posts: n/a
Default What Amateur Radio Emergency Communications?

Mike Coslo wrote:


Let me see now... I have a reading comprehension problem... There are
MILLIONS of FRS users compared to 675,000 couch potatoes. What makes you
think that the proposal for a National SOS Radio Network is going to make
any changes to Amateur Radio Service response to national disasters?
APPARENTLY, AMATEUR SERVICE FAILED TO MEET THE NEEDS OF A NATIONAL
RESPONSE
TO DISASTER COMMUNICATIONS IN THE FIRST PLACE---THAT'S WHY FRS IS
GOING TO
TAKE THE PLACE OF THE AMATEUR SERVICE!




And millions more cell phone users. Let the cell phone users make up
the emergency network, eh?

- Mike KB3EIA -



And we have seen first hand several times lately just how great the cell
phone network performs with all the cell towers out of service.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Broadcasting 0 June 26th 04 01:42 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews General 0 June 25th 04 07:29 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400 ­ June 11, 2004 Radionews Broadcasting 0 June 16th 04 11:30 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400 ­ June 11, 2004 Radionews Shortwave 0 June 16th 04 08:37 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1353 – July 18, 2003 Radionews Policy 1 July 20th 03 02:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017