Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 18:20:03 GMT, "TOM" wrote:
I thought I might share a couple of observations I've made regarding the Amateur Service; the situation in other locations may differ. Based upon my adventures last year in Florida when we got pounded by three hurricanes I was interested in finding out the utility of my Ham two meter transceiver by taking advantage of Field Day (simulated emergency test) in June. Problem #1. The event in June (Field Day) is not a simutlated emergency test. It is an emergency preparedness exercise. I believe there are a couple of SETs (actual title) during the year, and at least one is in the winter, if I recall. Operating on the 'National Simplex Calling Frequency' 146.52 MHz Problem #2. I didn't check the FD rules specifically, but the rules for ARRL contests generally (and don't think that FD isn't a contest) prohibit contacts on the calling frequencies. From my numerous calls I was able to contact NO ONE! Not one person responded to my Field Day calls throughout the day and I heard NO ONE calling Field Day! Not one Ham could I find operating Field Day on the two meter National Simplex Calling Frequency! Based on my previous paragraph, I'm not at all surprised by that. Yet to my surprise, I was able to consistently 'key-up' repeaters from Jacksonville to Palm Bay---approximately 2/3's the length of the state of Florida. Problem #3. Did you ID every time you kerchunked those repeaters? And to consider, this is an amateur service simulated emergency test in Florida occurring only 10 months after the destruction of Charley, Frances, and Jeanne. Problem #1A. Field Day still isn't a simulated emergency test. It made me wonder just how interested Hams are in emergency communications. Problem #4. I wonder how interested you are in emergency communications. Why didn't you get together with any local groups and participate in their Field Day operation? After all, if it was a simulated emergency test, as you insist on calling it, and you are all in a lather about hams' interest in emergency communications why weren't you actively involved in it instead of kerchunking 2M repeaters? I did have a nice conversation with a fellow 100 miles away via his repeater. Instead of participating in the emergency preparedness exercise? Why didn't you get on HF and work some of the tens of thousands of FD staions that are on from Saturday through Sunday? If you think wide area disasters such as hurricanes are going to be well served by 2M FM communications through repeaters you are as naive as those who think cell phones are going to be their salvation in the same event. Ideally, the 60 meter amateur band might become an important part of an emergency response provided by the amateur service. But, I just don't see any interest by the ARRL and those frequencies, every time I check them, remain unused. What does the allocation say? I haven't looked at it, but when we got the 10 MHz allocation several years ago it was on a secondary basis with a fairly serious proscription regarding interference. That and the narrow bandwidth of the allocation is why 10 MHz is excluded from both contests and operating awards. Any chance 60M is similar? It would seem so based on the FD rules segment you quoted: "2. Object: To work as many stations as possible on any and all amateur bands (excluding the 60, 30, 17, and 12-meter bands)..." After nearly forty years as an amateur radio operator, these are some of the issues that make me reconsider the utility of the amateur service as an emergency communications provider . After more than forty years as an amateur radio operator, I see the emphasis on emergency communications the one consistent thread from the League all these years. In the local club I was involved with in Illiniois for several years and the one local club here in Florida it actually got tiresome as more and more of the 2M ops were more interested in shiny badges and flashing lights than actual communications preparedness. Although the amateur service has played a significant role in handling emergency communications in the past, the changing face of technology has relegated the amateur service to a position of little consequence--- possibility, with better leadership, the amateur service can regain its former stature. Leadership begins from within. Instead of kerchunking repeaters and trying to make "contest" contacts on the calling frequency, you should be participating in FD--if not with an organized group, then by yourself, on HF, not whining on usenet three months after the event. I sincerely think, that with the devastation of Charley, Frances and Jeanne last year, and Katrina this year, the ARRL really needs to get off their ass and come up with a serious emergency communications plan. I suspect that the ARRL is a 'has been' organization and a new vision for amateur radio (emergency communications) needs to take their place. You said, "based upon my adventures last year in Florida when we got pounded by three hurricanes..." Did you get off your ass and provide any emergency communications assistance? Or did you spend your time kerchunking repeaters in 2/3 of the state? -- LRod Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999 http://www.woodbutcher.net Proud participant of rec.woodworking since February, 1997 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402  June 25, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402  June 25, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400  June 11, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400  June 11, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1353 – July 18, 2003 | Policy |