|
"Honus" wrote in message news:_x03f.41168$HM1.26616@trnddc04... "Honus" wrote in message news:Sw03f.37075$q81.35200@trnddc06... Personally speaking, I think you ought to be able to say what that guy did and get away with it. But that's just me, and I wasn't on the jury. As for making a statement of threat, you guys need to research the phrase "true threat". Therein lie your answers. ;) Oh, nuts...here's an article with examples for you. Don't say I never did you guys any favors. ;) http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intel...le.jsp?aid=556 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Threats made by a "group" that has a long history of violence against others isnt the same as some john doe citizen making a threat against another. J |
"an old friend" wrote in message ups.com... Jeff (nospam) wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message ups.com... not at all but advocating violence against me or even against you "comander" is violation of civl rights, and is in many places a criminal act ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Oh B.S. go back to law school. A person can advocate whatever he wants, its what you "do" about it that counts. If advocating violence against someone was a criminal act 40% of this country would be locked up. not at all the legal system has so broken down that the law is hardly enforced doesn't change the law ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Double BS,, cite me "one" case where someone "threatened' to do something and got charged. happens all the time mostly in mob cases and there are people still in jail for merely threatening reagan as a joke people were arested for threatening Mrs Bush on the campiagn trail The legal system hasnt gone to hell,,,, there never has been a law against making threats. guess you have never read the hate crimes laws in the nation ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ yea I know all about hate "crimes". Please tell me how you "prove" what someone is thinking and what they were going to do about it. |
This is when you have a REAL infected cut because you were much of a RETARD
to clean it up. Pus starts oozing out or PUSSING... The same retard that would misspell PUSHING would allow this to happen. "Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message link.net... "an old friend" wrote in message ups.com... Dan/W4NTI wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dan/W4NTI wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... Dan/W4NTI wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... BDK wrote: In article .com, says... cut The good old days is right! and people dare suggest that I can in any way be harmfull on such bands BDK Now who said that? All the "illegal jammers", etc, made the Liberty Net..FUN. Now it's just a bunch of old KKK and Nazi losers crying about the ...(insert race or jew here) picking on their poor old puckered up white cracker asses. Awwwwww. One night, I did actually hear them talking about ...radio! I about crapped my pants! who? well all these folks claiming No Code will be the "end of Ham radio" BDK A O F is a bit paranoid. He is under the impression that every discussion should include him. Sort of like a 3 year old. Hmm Paranoia according to you is beliving I have the same right to coment on the posts in here as everyone else Dan/W4NTI That's the point AOF, you don't. ah but I do I have the same rights as you do One day you might grow up and realize that fact, but I certainlly would not recomend anyone hold thier breath waiting for it You are one of those elist folks that can't accept that are ONLy equal of the rest of us Dan/W4NTI Your so-called rights STOP at my nose. agreed you got this part right I have the right not to be annoyed by the likes of you, child brain, ignorant of basic facts about ham radio. but you blow it here you do not have the right not to be annoyed you have the right not to read any I or anyone else writes but not to regulate what we write or wether we write something that annoys you And too stupid to learn. you are just being you ignorant self smething you have a right be, if you are fool enough to choose it Now go away and suck your thumb. they you are pusing it I have the same right to be here and post as you do Dan/W4NTI Hey group../././.Could someone translate this last attemp at communication from Markie? Especially the last part.....what the hell is "pussing" ??????? Dan/W4NTI |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
|
Great Liberty Net 3.931
Free men are not equal, and equal men are not free. Those who believe in an
artificially enforced equality, therefore, hate the freedom which naturally proves them to be silly and ignorant, brainwashed little sheep. Ace - WH2T "KØHB" wrote in message nk.net... "an_old_friend" wrote You are one of those elist folks that can't accept that are ONLy equal of the rest of us The "equality of all" is a naive myth which serves mainly to perpetuate mediocrity in the human race. "....that all men are created equal" makes a nice sound-bite but even the most casual examination of any random sample of humankind disproves it beyond any doubt. It always baffles me that free people buy into the notion of "democratic equality", because in fact the notions of "freedom" and "all are equal" are almost diametrically opposed. If I accept that I am your equal (and that you are mine) then I give up all freedom to be different from you, better than you, or worse than you. I simply WILL NOT give up that freedom, and therefore I reject the notion of "human equality". If you want to explore the results of real human equality, read Kurt Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron" at http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/hb.html 73, de Hans, K0HB |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
an old friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: cut and none of the other persona mention ( Adams, Franklin, Livingston, and Sherman) were slave holders at all therefore again the document was not written by slaveholders in the pural God are you stupid, Marky. What about the authors of the document from all the Southern Colonies which later became states? what authors? the Congress adopted the declaration they did not write the thing Oh, stupid Marky? I suppose the ink just jumped onto the parchment without the use of a quill pen, too. The declaration was written basicaly by Tom Jerfferson with a bit of input from Adams and Franklin "Basically", you are an idiot who doesn't know what the hell you are talking about. Oh, and his name was Thomas "Jefferson", stupid. the Congress asked for and received a bunch of revisions all approved by Tom, that is editing not writing You wouldn't know the difference anyways, stupid. cut Run away, Marky, run away. |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
Jeff (nospam) wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message ups.com... Jeff (nospam) wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message ups.com... not at all but advocating violence against me or even against you "comander" is violation of civl rights, and is in many places a criminal act ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Oh B.S. go back to law school. A person can advocate whatever he wants, its what you "do" about it that counts. If advocating violence against someone was a criminal act 40% of this country would be locked up. not at all the legal system has so broken down that the law is hardly enforced doesn't change the law ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Double BS,, cite me "one" case where someone "threatened' to do something and got charged. happens all the time mostly in mob cases and there are people still in jail for merely threatening reagan as a joke people were arested for threatening Mrs Bush on the campiagn trail The legal system hasnt gone to hell,,,, there never has been a law against making threats. guess you have never read the hate crimes laws in the nation ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ yea I know all about hate "crimes". Please tell me how you "prove" what someone is thinking and what they were going to do about it. never said I was going to try shows you are not reading the thread too |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
Dr.Ace wrote: Free men are not equal, and equal men are not free. Those who believe in an artificially enforced equality, therefore, hate the freedom which naturally proves them to be silly and ignorant, brainwashed little sheep. Ace - WH2T bull**** is a complete response , and a proper label for that dreck "KØHB" wrote in message nk.net... "an_old_friend" wrote You are one of those elist folks that can't accept that are ONLy equal of the rest of us The "equality of all" is a naive myth which serves mainly to perpetuate mediocrity in the human race. "....that all men are created equal" makes a nice sound-bite but even the most casual examination of any random sample of humankind disproves it beyond any doubt. It always baffles me that free people buy into the notion of "democratic equality", because in fact the notions of "freedom" and "all are equal" are almost diametrically opposed. If I accept that I am your equal (and that you are mine) then I give up all freedom to be different from you, better than you, or worse than you. I simply WILL NOT give up that freedom, and therefore I reject the notion of "human equality". If you want to explore the results of real human equality, read Kurt Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron" at http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/hb.html 73, de Hans, K0HB |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: cut and none of the other persona mention ( Adams, Franklin, Livingston, and Sherman) were slave holders at all therefore again the document was not written by slaveholders in the pural God are you stupid, Marky. What about the authors of the document from all the Southern Colonies which later became states? what authors? the Congress adopted the declaration they did not write the thing Oh, stupid Marky? I suppose the ink just jumped onto the parchment without the use of a quill pen, too. no never said that idiot The declaration was written basicaly by Tom Jerfferson with a bit of input from Adams and Franklin "Basically", you are an idiot who doesn't know what the hell you are talking about. Oh, and his name was Thomas "Jefferson", stupid. sure do knwo about it alot mor than you it would seem not that knowing more than you about much of anything is much of an acheievement the Congress asked for and received a bunch of revisions all approved by Tom, that is editing not writing You wouldn't know the difference anyways, stupid. I sure do as is obvious by the thread cut Run away, Marky, run away. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com