![]() |
nobodys old friend wrote: K=D8HB wrote: "nobodys_old_friend" simple Bull#### Hans equality in rights does not mean one gives up the right to the be different You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and we= all agree with it. obvioulsy not Hans or I guess you haven't been reading Dan lately, he has been dening I have the same rights as Him. In addition Steve, Dee, Dave Heil, even most recently some one neamed "ace" and others making claims based on various nonsense that I don't have the same rights as they do "denying" "named" No... Most of us said you're NOT our EQUAL. There's a difference. There's only one thing I KNOW you do better than me, and a second I am willing to give you the benefit of the doubt on... The first is lying. The second one is physically gratifying the male of the species... But I wasn't talking about "rights". I was talking about the flawed n= otion that "all men are CREATED equal". We all have different physical attri= butes, different levels of intelligence, different native skills and abilities= , etc., etc., etc. Clearly we are NOT created equal. As an example, you may h= ave a great sense of pitch and rythm along with a good voice, so might become= a famous singer. I on the other hand, can't carry a tune in a tow sack. Clear= to all but deaf observers, we are NOT equal. The same analogy can be applied = to any human attribute you wish to examine, yet politicians (even though they = don't practice it themselves) still feed the masses this "created equal" myth= , and the masses still buy into it. If you want to explore the results of real human equality, read Kurt Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron" at http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/hb.html why since the line of "Reasoning" is GIGO I recommended it because KV does a much better job than I in illustrati= ng the issue. well in this case itis not the issue I am interested in, so it would still be GIGO, just for different reason In other words you have no reasonable sound defense, so you'll just slink away with some bland excuse... No problem. =20 Steve, K4YZ |
K=D8HB wrote: "nobodys_old_friend" simple Bull#### Hans equality in rights does not mean one gives up the right to the be different You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and we a= ll agree with it. But I wasn't talking about "rights". I was talking about the flawed not= ion that "all men are CREATED equal". We all have different physical attribu= tes, different levels of intelligence, different native skills and abilities, = etc., etc., etc. Clearly we are NOT created equal. As an example, you may hav= e a great sense of pitch and rythm along with a good voice, so might become a= famous singer...(SNIP) SOMEone in Minnesota let the maple syrup ferment just a bit too long! 73 Steve, K4YZ |
"KØHB" wrote in message nk.net... "an_old_friend" simple Bull**** Hans equality in rights does not mean one gives up the right to the be different You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and we all agree with it. But I wasn't talking about "rights". I was talking about the flawed notion that "all men are CREATED equal". We all have different physical attributes, different levels of intelligence, different native skills and abilities, etc., etc., etc. Clearly we are NOT created equal. As an example, you may have a great sense of pitch and rythm along with a good voice, so might become a famous singer. I on the other hand, can't carry a tune in a tow sack. Clear to all but deaf observers, we are NOT equal. The same analogy can be applied to any human attribute you wish to examine, yet politicians (even though they don't practice it themselves) still feed the masses this "created equal" myth, and the masses still buy into it. If you want to explore the results of real human equality, read Kurt Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron" at http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/hb.html why since the line of "Reasoning" is GIGO I recommended it because KV does a much better job than I in illustrating the issue. Beep beep de Hans, K0HB Quite an intriguing story. Although I like science fiction, I've never been a fan of Kurt Vonnegut so have not read this story before. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
"an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... KØHB wrote: "an_old_friend" simple Bull**** Hans equality in rights does not mean one gives up the right to the be different You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and we all agree with it. obvioulsy not Hans or I guess you haven't been reading Dan lately, he has been dening I have the same rights as Him. In addition Steve, Dee, Dave Heil, even most recently some one neamed "ace" and others making claims based on various nonsense that I don't have the same rights as they do _____________________________________________ I have never stated you do not have the same rights as any other human being. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Dee Flint wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... K=D8HB wrote: "an_old_friend" simple Bull**** Hans equality in rights does not mean one gives up the right to the be different You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and we all agree with it. obvioulsy not Hans or I guess you haven't been reading Dan lately, he has been dening I have the same rights as Him. In addition Steve, Dee, Dave Heil, even most recently some one neamed "ace" and others making claims based on various nonsense that I don't have the same rights as they do _____________________________________________ I have never stated you do not have the same rights as any other human being. You ahve stated that I don't have to right to post peacefully without explaining myself to you you have also claimed I and the rest of the techs don't have the priviledge to decide for yourself how to operate (within) the rules without agreeing to acccept the hectoring of personas like yourself Indeed you have calimed I am under some obligation to give Bill Gates even more of Money than everyone else BTW gues you were not being truthfull when you claimed you did not read my posts or that you could not read em =20 Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: K=D8HB wrote: "nobodys_old_friend" simple Bull#### Hans equality in rights does not mean one gives up the right to the be different You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and = we all agree with it. obvioulsy not Hans or I guess you haven't been reading Dan lately, he has been dening I have the same rights as Him. In addition Steve, Dee, Dave Heil, even most recently some one neamed "ace" and others making claims based on various nonsense that I don't have the same rights as they do "denying" "named" No... Most of us said you're NOT our EQUAL. meaning you say Hans was worng is his statement cut |
"an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... KØHB wrote: "an_old_friend" simple Bull**** Hans equality in rights does not mean one gives up the right to the be different You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and we all agree with it. obvioulsy not Hans or I guess you haven't been reading Dan lately, he has been dening I have the same rights as Him. In addition Steve, Dee, Dave Heil, even most recently some one neamed "ace" and others making claims based on various nonsense that I don't have the same rights as they do _____________________________________________ I have never stated you do not have the same rights as any other human being. Quote You ahve stated that I don't have to right to post peacefully without explaining myself to you Unquote This is incorrect. I have never said any such thing. I have said that if people can't understand you, why do you bother to post and why should we bother to read them. You have the right to post and we have the right not to pay any attention. Quote you have also claimed I and the rest of the techs don't have the priviledge to decide for yourself how to operate (within) the rules without agreeing to acccept the hectoring of personas like yourself Unquote I have not hectored you nor do I approve of anyone hectoring people. If you have misconstrued my statements, that's your problem not mine. Quote Indeed you have calimed I am under some obligation to give Bill Gates even more of Money than everyone else Unquote Never said any such thing. I have stated that there are means for people with difficulties to compensate for those difficulties. If they choose not to take advantage of such tools, don't blame others for their opinions of your work. That you do not want to invest in appropriate tools is again your problem not mine. It's like anything else in life. I'm too short to reach the top of the cupboards so I purchased a step stool. It would be foolish to complain that the top shelf is too high. Quote BTW gues you were not being truthfull when you claimed you did not read my posts or that you could not read em Unquote Incorrect. I stated that I could not read SOME of your posts. If a post is not clear, I don't finish reading it and I don't respond to it. That is my right. Others are quite legible. If I find them interesting, I respond. That is also my right. I also stated that I would not bother with your posts until you had regained some of your equilibrium. Sufficient time has passed that it has been worth checking. I also do a search so as to be able to choose whether I want to respond if someone should post false statements about me as you have done in this and the preceding posts. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
"an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... KØHB wrote: "an_old_friend" simple Bull**** Hans equality in rights does not mean one gives up the right to the be different You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and we all agree with it. obvioulsy not Hans or I guess you haven't been reading Dan lately, he has been dening I have the same rights as Him. In addition Steve, Dee, Dave Heil, even most recently some one neamed "ace" and others making claims based on various nonsense that I don't have the same rights as they do _____________________________________________ I have never stated you do not have the same rights as any other human being. Quote You ahve stated that I don't have to right to post peacefully without explaining myself to you Unquote This is incorrect. I have never said any such thing. I have said that if people can't understand you, why do you bother to post and why should we bother to read them. You have the right to post and we have the right not to pay any attention. no you spend days harassing me for it and you continue off and on since then that is dening the right peacefully without explaining myself you choose to deny me that right bymeans of harrasment Quote you have also claimed I and the rest of the techs don't have the priviledge to decide for yourself how to operate (within) the rules without agreeing to acccept the hectoring of personas like yourself Unquote I have not hectored you nor do I approve of anyone hectoring people. If you have misconstrued my statements, that's your problem not mine. bull**** you insult other operators based on class Indeed you claim that You have the right to determine if other are insulted despite the a fact it is by law the receiveing that makes that judgment Quote Indeed you have calimed I am under some obligation to give Bill Gates even more of Money than everyone else Unquote Never said any such thing. no you spent a wekk harrasing me on the subject Quote BTW gues you were not being truthfull when you claimed you did not read my posts or that you could not read em Unquote Incorrect. I stated that I could not read SOME of your posts. If a post is not clear, I don't finish reading it and I don't respond to it. That is my right. Others are quite legible. If I find them interesting, I respond. That is also my right. I also stated that I would not bother with your posts until you had regained some of your equilibrium. Sufficient time has passed that it has been worth checking. I also do a search so as to be able to choose whether I want to respond if someone should post false statements about me as you have done in this and the preceding posts. no false statement you seek to deny the rights of others simple fact ypou claim you have rights that you deny to others like msyelf Dee D. Flint, N8UZE For someone who is so concerned about Baxter's good name and potential slander thereof, you seem totally unconcerned about applying your own double standard and slandering anyone who does not bow down to your mistaken interpretations of other's posts. However, you seem to have gone off the deep end again so I see no point in conversing with you at this time. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... K=D8HB wrote: "an_old_friend" simple Bull**** Hans equality in rights does not mean one gives up the right to the be different You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and = we all agree with it. obvioulsy not Hans or I guess you haven't been reading Dan lately, he has been dening I have the same rights as Him. In addition Steve, Dee, Dave Heil, even most recently some one neamed "ace" and others making claims based on various nonsense that I don't have the same rights as they do _____________________________________________ I have never stated you do not have the same rights as any other human being. Quote You ahve stated that I don't have to right to post peacefully without explaining myself to you Unquote This is incorrect. I have never said any such thing. I have said that if people can't understand you, why do you bother to post and why should we bother to read them. You have the right to post and we have the right not to pay any attention. no you spend days harassing me for it and you continue off and on since then that is dening the right peacefully without explaining myself you choose to deny me that right bymeans of harrasment Quote you have also claimed I and the rest of the techs don't have the priviledge to decide for yourself how to operate (within) the rules without agreeing to acccept the hectoring of personas like yourself Unquote I have not hectored you nor do I approve of anyone hectoring people. If = you have misconstrued my statements, that's your problem not mine. bull**** you insult other operators based on class Indeed you claim that You have the right to determine if other are insulted despite the a fact it is by law the receiveing that makes that judgment Quote Indeed you have calimed I am under some obligation to give Bill Gates even more of Money than everyone else Unquote Never said any such thing. no you spent a wekk harrasing me on the subject Quote BTW gues you were not being truthfull when you claimed you did not read my posts or that you could not read em Unquote Incorrect. I stated that I could not read SOME of your posts. If a post = is not clear, I don't finish reading it and I don't respond to it. That is = my right. Others are quite legible. If I find them interesting, I respond. That is also my right. I also stated that I would not bother with your posts until you had regai= ned some of your equilibrium. Sufficient time has passed that it has been wo= rth checking. I also do a search so as to be able to choose whether I want to respond if someone should post false statements about me as you have done= in this and the preceding posts. no false statement you seek to deny the rights of others simple fact ypou claim you have rights that you deny to others like msyelf =20 Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... K=D8HB wrote: "an_old_friend" simple Bull**** Hans equality in rights does not mean one gives up the right to the be different You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and we all agree with it. obvioulsy not Hans or I guess you haven't been reading Dan lately, he has been dening I have the same rights as Him. In addition Steve, De= e, Dave Heil, even most recently some one neamed "ace" and others making claims based on various nonsense that I don't have the same rights as they do _____________________________________________ I have never stated you do not have the same rights as any other human being. Quote You ahve stated that I don't have to right to post peacefully without explaining myself to you Unquote This is incorrect. I have never said any such thing. I have said that= if people can't understand you, why do you bother to post and why should we bother to read them. You have the right to post and we have the right = not to pay any attention. no you spend days harassing me for it and you continue off and on since then that is dening the right peacefully without explaining myself you choose to deny me that right bymeans of harrasment Quote you have also claimed I and the rest of the techs don't have the priviledge to decide for yourself how to operate (within) the rules without agreeing to acccept the hectoring of personas like yourself Unquote I have not hectored you nor do I approve of anyone hectoring people. If you have misconstrued my statements, that's your problem not mine. bull**** you insult other operators based on class Indeed you claim that You have the right to determine if other are insulted despite the a fact it is by law the receiveing that makes that judgment Quote Indeed you have calimed I am under some obligation to give Bill Gates even more of Money than everyone else Unquote Never said any such thing. no you spent a wekk harrasing me on the subject Quote BTW gues you were not being truthfull when you claimed you did not read my posts or that you could not read em Unquote Incorrect. I stated that I could not read SOME of your posts. If a post is not clear, I don't finish reading it and I don't respond to it. That is my right. Others are quite legible. If I find them interesting, I respon= d=2E That is also my right. I also stated that I would not bother with your posts until you had regained some of your equilibrium. Sufficient time has passed that it has been worth checking. I also do a search so as to be able to choose whether I want= to respond if someone should post false statements about me as you have do= ne in this and the preceding posts. no false statement you seek to deny the rights of others simple fact ypou claim you have rights that you deny to others like msyelf Dee D. Flint, N8UZE For someone who is so concerned about Baxter's good name and potential slander thereof, you seem totally unconcerned about applying your own dou= ble standard and slandering anyone who does not bow down to your mistaken interpretations of other's posts. what are you smoking bitch? no double standard at all not esp concerned about Baxter However, you seem to have gone off the deep end again so I see no point in conversing with you at this time. see to it then nother ever changed I never did tolerate elitist bitch's such as yourself =20 Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com