|
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
The FCC friday affirmed Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine. You can read the
article he http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/12/02/101/?nc=1 Todd N9OGL |
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
Man that Gerritsen guy sounds like a psycho
|
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
N9OGL wrote: The FCC friday affirmed Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine. You can read the article he http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/12/02/101/?nc=1 This guy is an idiot and a loser, but having lived in that area I can attest to the crapola that manifests in that area and that punks like him are a dime-a-dozen. The infamous "W6NUT" repeater on 147.435 makes RRAP's worst day look like a Lady's Tea at Church on Sunday... 73 Steve, K4YZ |
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........
I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy. You poor, poor sods! |
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
wrote in message oups.com... Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........ I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy. You poor, poor sods! You should be able to assimilate yourself quite well with the likes of "2Test" AB8MQ and some of his brother jammers and malcontents. Does the below look familiar, Mr. Bailey???? We, at the LPWS have often been accused of being jammers, but this is far from the truth. Admittedly, there is the playing of music on repeaters, but these are usually idle until one of our members comes along with a jolly tune (see the selection for download!). An analogy of what occurs could be the following:- You stand on a river bridge calmly throwing stones into the water, a few anglers a mile or so away hear this and pack up and walk down to the area of the river beneath the bridge and set up their rods. They then complain that you are disturbing the fish! |
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
Anon wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........ I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy. You poor, poor sods! You should be able to assimilate yourself quite well with the likes of "2Test" AB8MQ and some of his brother jammers and malcontents. Does the below look familiar, Mr. Bailey???? AB8MQ never got a fine, dumbass Davies. Unlike you! We, at the LPWS have often been accused of being jammers, but this is far from the truth. Admittedly, there is the playing of music on repeaters, but these are usually idle until one of our members comes along with a jolly tune (see the selection for download!). An analogy of what occurs could be the following:- You stand on a river bridge calmly throwing stones into the water, a few anglers a mile or so away hear this and pack up and walk down to the area of the river beneath the bridge and set up their rods. They then complain that you are disturbing the fish! You jam the Huntsville and Athens, Alabama repeaters, fatty. |
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
Take your Lithium Woger.
Vertially challenged Boy. ROTFLMAO! |
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
Anon wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........ I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy. You poor, poor sods! You should be able to assimilate yourself quite well with the likes of "2Test" AB8MQ and some of his brother jammers and malcontents. Does the below look familiar, Mr. Bailey???? AB8MQ never got a fine, dumbass Davies. Unlike you! We, at the LPWS have often been accused of being jammers, but this is far from the truth. Admittedly, there is the playing of music on repeaters, but these are usually idle until one of our members comes along with a jolly tune (see the selection for download!). An analogy of what occurs could be the following:- You stand on a river bridge calmly throwing stones into the water, a few anglers a mile or so away hear this and pack up and walk down to the area of the river beneath the bridge and set up their rods. They then complain that you are disturbing the fish! You jam the Huntsville and Athens, Alabama repeaters, fatty. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^ Who said anything about a fine, Roger? We know Riley didn't fine you. He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated (not 'invited') that you retest. Any Google search of AB8MQ will show that. |
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
Lisping cocksucker II wrote: Anon wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........ I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy. You poor, poor sods! You should be able to assimilate yourself quite well with the likes of "2Test" AB8MQ and some of his brother jammers and malcontents. Does the below look familiar, Mr. Bailey???? AB8MQ never got a fine, dumbass Davies. Unlike you! We, at the LPWS have often been accused of being jammers, but this is far from the truth. Admittedly, there is the playing of music on repeaters, but these are usually idle until one of our members comes along with a jolly tune (see the selection for download!). An analogy of what occurs could be the following:- You stand on a river bridge calmly throwing stones into the water, a few anglers a mile or so away hear this and pack up and walk down to the area of the river beneath the bridge and set up their rods. They then complain that you are disturbing the fish! You jam the Huntsville and Athens, Alabama repeaters, fatty. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^ Who said anything about a fine, Roger? Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass. We know Riley didn't fine you. Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up as usual. He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated (not 'invited') that you retest. But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to read. Any Google search of AB8MQ will show that. Sort of like those 4 letters you recieved from him (Riley), dumbass. |
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
Who said anything about a fine, Roger? Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass. We know Riley didn't fine you. Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up as usual. He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated (not 'invited') that you retest. But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to read. No reason? Did Riley's mention of malicious interference in the letters sent you sound like "no reason"??? Still in denial, are you? |
AB8MQ is in denial again
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^ Who said anything about a fine, Roger? Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass. We know Riley didn't fine you. Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up as usual. He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated (not 'invited') that you retest. But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to read. .............................................. To show reason, "Not Roger", read below. (taken from a Hollingsworth letter to you) "citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20 meters. "This interference has occurred at...." Color it what you will Woger, but a pig in the poke is still a pig. Learn to read, Pig. |
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
"Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post,
dumbass.' You will find 2test behind the curtains. |
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
|
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
Todd "Toiddie" Daugherty, N9OGL. Todd is a combination of a
"Saturday Night Live" version of Howard Stern on the Amateur airways, with just a bit of PeeWee Herman thrown in for flavor. He purports to operate an "information bulletin" station yet refers to all of his broadcasting as "shows", and clearly uses these to broadcast his personal opinion and rhetoric, not "information". Nice, coming from someone who has NEVER heard my bulletin. If you think (which I really doubt you do) it's illegal then bitch to the FCC, if you aren't going to complain then shut the HELL up. Almost 40, he's living at home and sopping up all the resources he can from mumsy and pops while they are still able to do it. Yeah right steve, lying again Todd's biggest rants center around (1) his inability to obtain an LPFM license for his non-existant "company", Steve, it was LOW POWER TV not LOW POWER FM, get your fact right before posting. As for my "company" who said it's non-exisant? you a little nobody. RIGHT! (2) his illegal use of the Amateur service to take the place of the LPFM license he didn't get, Dam right, and there's NOTHING yo can do about it Bwahahaha and now (3) his BBS sites for the promulgation of kiddy-porn anime. I wish him well since there's a recent news release of a guy sentenced by a FEDERAL court for promulgating cartoon-style kiddy-porn. The truth steve is the guy was found guilty of possession REAL child porn, animation porn is in fact legal (Below is the Federal Law) SSEC. 502. IMPROVEMENTS TO PROHIBITION ON VIRTUAL CHILD PORNOGRAPHY. (a) Section 2256(8) of title 18, United States Code, is amended- (1) so that subparagraph (B) reads as follows: ''(B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or''; (2) by striking ''; or'' at the end of subparagraph (C) and inserting a period; and (3) by striking subparagraph (D). (b) Section 2256(2) of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: ''(2)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), 'sexually explicit conduct' means actual or simulated-''(i) sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oralgenital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; ''(ii) bestiality; ''(iii) masturbation; ''(iv) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or ''(v) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person; ''(B) For purposes of subsection 8(B) of this section, 'sexually explicit conduct' means- [next page] ''(i) graphic sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex, or lascivious simulated sexual intercourse where the genitals, breast, or pubic area of any person is exhibited; ''(ii) graphic or lascivious simulated; ''(I) bestiality; ''(II) masturbation; or ''(III) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or ''(iii) graphic or simulated lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;''. (c) Section 2256 is amended by inserting at the end the following new paragraphs: ''(10) 'graphic', when used with respect to a depiction of sexually explicit conduct, means that a viewer can observe any part of the genitals or pubic area of any depicted person or animal during any part of the time that the sexually explicit conduct is being depicted; and ''(11) the term 'indistinguishable' used with respect to a depiction, means virtually indistinguishable, in that the depiction is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction would conclude that the depiction is of an actual minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. This definition does not apply to depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings depicting minors or adults.''. (d) Section 2252A(c) of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: ''(c) It shall be an affirmative defense to a charge of violating paragraph (1), (2), (3)(A), (4), or (5) of subsection (a) that- ''(1)(A) the alleged child pornography was produced using an actual person or persons engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and ''(B) each such person was an adult at the time the material was produced; or''(2) the alleged child pornography was not produced using any actual minor or minors. No affirmative defense under subsection (c)(2) shall be available in any prosecution that involves child pornography as described in section 2256(8)(C). A defendant may not assert an affirmative defense to a charge of violating paragraph (1), (2), (3)(A), (4), or (5) of subsection (a) unless, within the time provided for filing pretrial motions or at such time prior to trial as the judge may direct, but in no event later than 10 days before the commencement of the trial, the defendant provides the court and the United States with notice of the intent to assert such defense and the substance of any expert or other specialized testimony or evidence upon which the defendant intends to rely. If the defendant fails to comply [NEW PAGE VerDate 11-MAY-2000 21:52 May 02, 2003 Jkt 019139 PO 00021 Frm 00031 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL021.108 APPS24 PsN: PUBL021 117 STAT. 680 PUBLIC LAW 108-21-APR. 30, 2003] with this subsection, the court shall, absent a finding of extraordinary circumstances that prevented timely compliance, prohibit the defendant from asserting such defense to a charge of violating paragraph (1), (2), (3)(A), (4), or (5) of subsection (a) or presenting any evidence for which the defendant has failed to provide proper and timely notice.''. Of course like all kiddy-porners, he claims it's his "Constitutional" right to promulgate kiddy-porn. Animation Porn, even lolicon is LEGAL and in 2001 the US Supreme Court ruled that "virtual child porn" (which includes animation lolicon) WAS protected by the First Amendment. Beside what are going to do about it??? NOTHING, grow up steve you little worm Todd N9OGL |
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
N9OGL wrote: Todd "Toiddie" Daugherty, N9OGL. Todd is a combination of a "Saturday Night Live" version of Howard Stern on the Amateur airways, with just a bit of PeeWee Herman thrown in for flavor. He purports to operate an "information bulletin" station yet refers to all of his broadcasting as "shows", and clearly uses these to broadcast his personal opinion and rhetoric, not "information". Nice, coming from someone who has NEVER heard my bulletin. If you think (which I really doubt you do) it's illegal then bitch to the FCC, if you aren't going to complain then shut the HELL up. Hey Toiddie...If you can bring YOUR mindless trash in here under the color of protection of the Constitution, then guess what...?!?!? YOU don't have ANY right to suggest someone else not exercise their opinions regardless of what YOU think of them. Almost 40, he's living at home and sopping up all the resources he can from mumsy and pops while they are still able to do it. Yeah right steve, lying again Nope. Todd's biggest rants center around (1) his inability to obtain an LPFM license for his non-existant "company", Steve, it was LOW POWER TV not LOW POWER FM, get your fact right before posting. As for my "company" who said it's non-exisant? you a little nobody. RIGHT! LPTV...I stand corrected...However the rest remains correct. Your "company" does not have a charter in the State of Illinois. Nor is there a business license I can find. Ergo...It doesn't exist...save perhaps in your imagination. (2) his illegal use of the Amateur service to take the place of the LPFM license he didn't get, Dam right, and there's NOTHING yo can do about it Bwahahaha Sure there is. and now (3) his BBS sites for the promulgation of kiddy-porn anime. I wish him well since there's a recent news release of a guy sentenced by a FEDERAL court for promulgating cartoon-style kiddy-porn. The truth steve is the guy was found guilty of possession REAL child porn, animation porn is in fact legal (Below is the Federal Law) SSEC. 502. IMPROVEMENTS TO PROHIBITION ON VIRTUAL CHILD PORNOGRAPHY....SNIP Sooner or later you'll get jammed up, Toiddie, and you'll wish you'd spent your precious "freedom of speech" on something meaningful. Of course like all kiddy-porners, he claims it's his "Constitutional" right to promulgate kiddy-porn. Animation Porn, even lolicon is LEGAL and in 2001 the US Supreme Court ruled that "virtual child porn" (which includes animation lolicon) WAS protected by the First Amendment. Beside what are going to do about it??? NOTHING, grow up steve you little worm I'm already "doing something" about it, Todd. And from what I've seen, YOU are the worm, four eyes. Steve, K4YZ |
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
Hey Toiddie...If you can bring YOUR mindless trash in here under
the color of protection of the Constitution, then guess what...?!?!? YOU don't have ANY right to suggest someone else not exercise their opinions regardless of what YOU think of them. That's the problem steve with the first amendment huh? BTW I do have the right to assert and protect myself from assholes like you, regardless if you like it or not. Yeah right steve, lying again Nope. Where's your proof, Sure I live at home, but that don't mean I don't have money, I own my own business. Steve, it was LOW POWER TV not LOW POWER FM, get your fact right before posting. As for my "company" who said it's non-exisant? you a little nobody. RIGHT! LPTV...I stand corrected...However the rest remains correct. Your "company" does not have a charter in the State of Illinois. Nor is there a business license I can find. But you forget one thing, as I've stated many times before, there's a lot more to that LPTV deal it then you know. Secondly my "company" as you claim isn't a business, it's a club, it always has been, since 1983. It started in 1983 as DDC-TV, we produced programs for the local public acess channel, and for school. Most of the people that were in our group back then was also part of the local theater group called "the Spotlight Players" In 1985 We started Langley Park Studio's for the sole purpose to get people interested in theater and the preforming arts. In 1987 the Spotlight Player's disbanned so we were all that was left when it can to theater and the arts. In the 1990's we changed it to Langley Park Telecommuniation, because we not only wanted to promote theater and the preforming arts but telecommunication as well. Langley Park has done a hell of lot more work then what you think. We've had people who has gone through our group only to later go on into other aspects of the industry. We had one guy name Joey who was with our group and now has his own rock band (Last time I talked to him they had cut an album). Another one named Matt, went to the University of Florida and got his degree in theater. We've also taught a number of people radio and electronics only to later move on into the military and Universities to continue their studies in that field. So steve, I don't really give a **** what you think, cause frankly you don't know what the hell your talking about. Dam right, and there's NOTHING yo can do about it Bwahahaha Sure there is. RIGHT.....you've been saying that for a long time now... Sooner or later you'll get jammed up, Toiddie, and you'll wish you'd spent your precious "freedom of speech" on something meaningful. Keep dreaming steve. Animation Porn, even lolicon is LEGAL and in 2001 the US Supreme Court ruled that "virtual child porn" (which includes animation lolicon) WAS protected by the First Amendment. Beside what are going to do about it??? NOTHING, grow up steve you little worm I'm already "doing something" about it, Todd. What tell your mommy?? Putz Todd N9OGL |
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
Yassar wrote: Who said anything about a fine, Roger? Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass. We know Riley didn't fine you. Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up as usual. He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated (not 'invited') that you retest. But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to read. No reason? Did Riley's mention of malicious interference in the letters sent you sound like "no reason"??? Yet the retest letter that has been posted ad nauseum gives no reason like "interference" for the retest. Still in denial, are you? You're still a ****ing imbecile, aren't you? |
AB8MQ's "detractors" show thay have their heads up their asses
Who said I was Roger? wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^ Who said anything about a fine, Roger? Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass. We know Riley didn't fine you. Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up as usual. He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated (not 'invited') that you retest. But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to read. ............................................. To show reason, "Not Roger", read below. (taken from a Hollingsworth letter to you) No, that is taken from the ARRL press release in the enforcement letters news section. "citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20 meters. "This interference has occurred at...." Yet the actual retest letter that has been posted many times gives no reason. You lose, ****nuts. Color it what you will Woger, but a pig in the poke is still a pig. You should know, FATASSED pig. And, quit sucking so many cocks, your lisp is showing. Learn to read, Pig. Learn to read an actual letter from the FCC versus one from the ARRL news section's take on the subject, dumbass! |
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
Convicted child Molester
Commode Buzz Corey wrote: "Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass.' You will find 2test behind the curtains. And you'll never find you unless you find the **** stains on the floor because you hide behind doors when other hams come visiting. |
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
You seem to be quite familiar with the laws against child pornography,
Toad. Did the FBI agents read them to you the last time they caught you with some on your hard drive, faggot? |
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
You seem to be quite familiar with the laws against child pornography,
Toad. Did the FBI agents read them to you the last time they caught you with some on your hard drive, faggot? I know a lot of laws moron, BTW as stated before I don't mess with real child porn, I'm into ANIME and Hentai Todd N9OGL |
stvei trun any thread into attack thread
On 13 Dec 2005 06:04:23 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........ I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy. You poor, poor sods! Yes...the rowdy and the reckless. But beware the "Feeble Five." true to form everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
|
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
|
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
N9OGL wrote: You seem to be quite familiar with the laws against child pornography, Toad. Did the FBI agents read them to you the last time they caught you with some on your hard drive, faggot? I know a lot of laws moron, BTW as stated before I don't mess with real child porn, I'm into ANIME and Hentai You've posted ads for kiddie porn all over the internet, Toad. |
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
Convicted child molester
commode buzz corey wrote: AKA 2test wogie wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ LOL @ the Cameron ****. Keep guessing, retard. Convicted child Molester Commode Buzz Corey wrote: "Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass.' You will find 2test behind the curtains. And you'll never find you unless you find the **** stains on the floor because you hide behind doors when other hams come visiting. LOL at the wrong guess, naturally) LOL @ the Hiding Cockgobbler Buzzy, say, does your wife's yeasty **** provide all the yeast for her holiday baking needs? |
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
Lloyd II wrote: My unrequited love 2test, "I'm not Roger", I gets to pluck the large chunks from the port-a-potties which supplements the pizzas I steal from Papa John's. We know you do, Lloydie, we know you do. |
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
It's not kiddy porn, it's Hentai and Anime, BIG DIFFERENCE! then again
what the hell would you know Todd N9OGL |
More Markie Mularkie
|
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
N9OGL wrote: You seem to be quite familiar with the laws against child pornography, Toad. Did the FBI agents read them to you the last time they caught you with some on your hard drive, faggot? I know a lot of laws moron...(SNIP) Sure you do. You just don't understand them. You glean a few words that seem to support your personal opinion then bally-hoo the rest. BTW as stated before I don't mess with real child porn, I'm into ANIME and Hentai You SHOULD be "into" therapy. Preferably a locked-down, in-patient program. Maybe then Mumsy and Pops can get the your stuff sold, the house on the market and the locks changed. Steve, K4YZ |
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
You still have told us all what you plan to do about it.......lying
again steve?? N9OGL |
stveie whines somemore
On 17 Dec 2005 06:22:51 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: On 13 Dec 2005 06:04:23 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........ I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy. You poor, poor sods! Yes...the rowdy and the reckless. But beware the "Feeble Five." true to form As is this, Markie...(not ot mention the FORGED e-mail alias above...You're really rackin' em up, PaganBoy!) just trying to catch up with you stevie boy everyone should be advised that The following person...(SNIP) Still broadcasting a phone number that doesn't belong to me. then why do you care? more of stevie protesting too much One MarkieLie after another. Mark Morgan is a pathological liar. stevie does not not know the meaning of the phrase Steve, K4YZ everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
stevie shit
|
More Markie Mularkie
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com