2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

The spreading stain of the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme
has been allowed to contaminate Radio Hammery for
too long.

Now that the RSCB plays no part in licensing matters and
is little more than a money-hungry CBer's book publisher,
let's drive them out of business - if you haven't yet
resigned - then do so today _BEFORE_ your sub comes
up for renewal.

Don't forget - if you are one of the traditional _REAL_
Radio Hams - the RSCB is already taking you for
a sucker by using your hard-earned subscription
money to give free membership to the CBers
at the bottom end. If they're so eager to give
out free membership - let them have nothing
but non-paying members and then see how
long they can survive!

Show your disgust - resign today! Starve the
alien life form that is the gangrenous degeneration
of the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme of its life-blood!

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

SECONDED!!!

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

Orator For Decency wrote:

Show your disgust - resign today! Starve the
alien life form that is the gangrenous degeneration
of the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme of its life-blood!

I am resigning. I refuse to pay the windie licker tax.

--
Proud Holder of Old Nick's Deputy First Class Badge

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

If I was a member I would resign.......

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

§|ª®T?ߪRt?@$t wrote:
SECONDED!!!



TURDED


--

I fully support the Know Code debate.
Loud is Good. It lets you trample over M3s and other undesirables.

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

"Orator For Decency" wrote:

The spreading stain of the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme



i'm reminded of a posting some time ago....




- - - - - - - -

From: "Brian Reay"
Subject: Govt thinks AR will decline
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 20:15:08 +0100


One of our M3s has already decided the ARRL are a better deal.

If the RSGB has less members it has less income from members therefore less
money to spend salaries and on freebies (by which I mean 'jollys' to
meetings etc.). Unless, of course, these guys are cleverer than we think and
can do more with less ;-)

I may have missed something but it seems logical to me.

73

Brian

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

"§|ª®T?ߪRt?@$t" wrote in message
...
SECONDED!!!


That makes two ****s.
Regards Mike.

--
"Remember that age and treachery will always triumph over youth and
ability" (David Brent).

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

"§|ª®T?ߪRt?@$t" wrote in message
...
SECONDED!!!


One Prays to Nick

Will our prayers be answered Nick ??

Tox you know why I like them

:-(

DieSea

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

why is this posted to the USA?

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

Then clearly we must support the latest VIP "member"
of the RSCB and all do what he suggests.

Peter Kirby _WILL_ be pleased with his new lap dog!

zYYPK wrote:
"Orator For Decency" wrote:
The spreading stain of the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme
i'm reminded of a posting some time ago....
- - - - - - - -
From: "Brian Reay"
Subject: Govt thinks AR will decline
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 20:15:08 +0100

One of our M3s has already decided the ARRL are a better deal.
If the RSGB has less members it has less income from members therefore less
money to spend salaries and on freebies (by which I mean 'jollys' to
meetings etc.). Unless, of course, these guys are cleverer than we think and
can do more with less ;-)
I may have missed something but it seems logical to me.

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

Orator For Decency wrote:
Then clearly we must support the latest VIP "member"
of the RSCB and all do what he suggests.

Peter Kirby _WILL_ be pleased with his new lap dog!
cut
why is this **** being corsposeted to the states it concerns england
and english affair it is not the place of American has to make coment
on it

so orator take your **** where it belongs

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

Your posting is posted to Yankland for two reasons....

1. You cross-posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy and
rec.radio.amateur.misc
which although being international fora, also get sent to 3rd World
places like Yankland.

2. The google archive (formerly Deja Vu) sucks articles
from all over the globe, even, for example those in the Britland
hierarchy.

an Old friend wrote:
why is this posted to the USA?

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

Orator For Decency wrote:
Your posting is posted to Yankland for two reasons....
no no idout the question why did you post to policy etc

take you hate filled **** and keep english matter english

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

an Old friend wrote:
Orator For Decency wrote:
Your posting is posted to Yankland for two reasons....
no no idout the question why did you post to policy etc

take you hate filled **** and keep english matter english

You've noted quickly that he's not very nice :)

--
huLLy
Tel: 07976 123278
ICQ 136-987-925

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

"DieSea" wrote in message
...



Tox you know why I like them

:-(

Indeed, I do.

Regards
tox

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

huLLy wrote:
an Old friend wrote:
Orator For Decency wrote:
Your posting is posted to Yankland for two reasons....
no no idout the question why did you post to policy etc

take you hate filled **** and keep english matter english

You've noted quickly that he's not very nice :)

it doesnot take much

and I beleive in honesty I call **** by it proper name ,****

--
huLLy
Tel: 07976 123278
ICQ 136-987-925

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

an Old friend wrote:

take you hate filled **** and keep english matter english

Oi! Yank! This is not an English group it's a UK one.

--
Proud Holder of Old Nick's Deputy First Class Badge

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

A bit rich coming from a sheep shagger!


"Mike GW8IJT" wrote in message
...
"§|ª®T?ߪRt?@$t" wrote in message
...
SECONDED!!!


That makes two ****s.
Regards Mike.

--
"Remember that age and treachery will always triumph over youth and
ability" (David Brent).

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

Pun Krocker wrote

If I was a member I would resign.......

Seconded!

There's nothing stopping non-members from writing to Ofcom explaining
why they're non-members, and making representations as individuals (for
example, requesting a review of the current licensing scheme).

--
Hil

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

Hils wrote:
Pun Krocker wrote

If I was a member I would resign.......

Seconded!

There's nothing stopping non-members from writing to Ofcom explaining
why they're non-members, and making representations as individuals (for
example, requesting a review of the current licensing scheme).

well making a gues based on how things in Americe Vsav the ARRL and FCC
the indivgual Hams are largely un willing to stand up and say something
with some kind of Occifcail scation for it, this si likly why there
were about 3000 coment the recent NPRM here in the USA out of 600,000
hams and about 300,000 arrl memebrs

--
Hil

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

an Old friend wrote:

well making a gues based on how things in Americe Vsav the ARRL and FCC
the indivgual Hams are largely un willing to stand up and say something
with some kind of Occifcail scation for it, this si likly why there
were about 3000 coment the recent NPRM here in the USA out of 600,000
hams and about 300,000 arrl memebrs


Are you drunk, or just using so-called 'American' English.


--

I fully support the Know Code debate.
Loud is Good. It lets you trample over M3s and other undesirables.

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

an Old friend wrote

There's nothing stopping non-members from writing to Ofcom explaining
why they're non-members, and making representations as individuals (for
example, requesting a review of the current licensing scheme).

well making a gues based on how things in Americe Vsav the ARRL and FCC
the indivgual Hams are largely un willing to stand up and say something
with some kind of Occifcail scation for it, this si likly why there
were about 3000 coment the recent NPRM here in the USA out of 600,000
hams and about 300,000 arrl memebrs

I suspect that the ARRL is rather more representative of hams in the US
than the RSGB is of hams in the UK, but there's something in what you
say. By and large, citizens respond to corrupt "leaders" by working
longer hours, drinking more alcohol, and blaming the French and the
Arabs. OTOH, the opportunity is there for hams to cut out the middlemen
and tell the government agency what they want.

--
Hil

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

Know Code wrote:
an Old friend wrote:

well making a gues based on how things in Americe Vsav the ARRL and FCC
the indivgual Hams are largely un willing to stand up and say something
with some kind of Occifcail scation for it, this si likly why there
were about 3000 coment the recent NPRM here in the USA out of 600,000
hams and about 300,000 arrl memebrs


Are you drunk, or just using so-called 'American' English.

in point of fact not either I am dyslexic and simply spell badly

you are crssos your drivel to RRAP so RRAP regaulara like myself it and
coment


--

I fully support the Know Code debate.
Loud is Good. It lets you trample over M3s and other undesirables.

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

an_old_friend wrote:
Know Code wrote:

an Old friend wrote:


well making a gues based on how things in Americe Vsav the ARRL and FCC
the indivgual Hams are largely un willing to stand up and say something
with some kind of Occifcail scation for it, this si likly why there
were about 3000 coment the recent NPRM here in the USA out of 600,000
hams and about 300,000 arrl memebrs


Are you drunk, or just using so-called 'American' English.


in point of fact not either I am dyslexic and simply spell badly

you are crssos your drivel to RRAP so RRAP regaulara like myself it and
coment

Care to put that in English?


--

I fully support the Know Code debate.
Loud is Good. It lets you trample over M3s and other undesirables.

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

Know Code wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Know Code wrote:

an Old friend wrote:
cut
Are you drunk, or just using so-called 'American' English.


in point of fact not either I am dyslexic and simply spell badly

you are crssos your drivel to RRAP so RRAP regaulara like myself it and
coment

Care to put that in English?

it is in english

learn to read though a few typos

or better still you could up to be at least ateenager in mental state


--

I fully support the Know Code debate.
Loud is Good. It lets you trample over M3s and other undesirables.

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

Hils wrote:

Pun Krocker wrote

If I was a member I would resign.......

Seconded!

There's nothing stopping non-members from writing to Ofcom explaining
why they're non-members, and making representations as individuals (for
example, requesting a review of the current licensing scheme).

Some of us have been doing this for a number of years. Perhaps that
input helped persuade OFCOM to do some surveys....

from
Aero Spike

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

You seem to be a Confused Babbler (CBer)

You have just upbraided me for discussing matters
of Britland, and now, here you are doing the same,
because Ofcom is a Britland institution.

(Cross-posted to rec.radio.cb to put you back where you
belong; you certainly exhibited Childish Broadcasting (CB)
in your recent posts)

an Old friend wrote:
Hils wrote:
There's nothing stopping non-members from writing to Ofcom explaining
why they're non-members, and making representations as individuals (for
example, requesting a review of the current licensing scheme).

well making a gues based on how things in Americe Vsav the ARRL and FCC
the indivgual Hams are largely un willing to stand up and say something
with some kind of Occifcail scation for it, this si likly why there
were about 3000 coment the recent NPRM here in the USA out of 600,000
hams and about 300,000 arrl memebrs

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

an_old_friend wrote:
Know Code wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

Know Code wrote:


an Old friend wrote:

cut

Are you drunk, or just using so-called 'American' English.


in point of fact not either I am dyslexic and simply spell badly

you are crssos your drivel to RRAP so RRAP regaulara like myself it and
coment

Care to put that in English?


it is in english

learn to read though a few typos

Few? Now there's the understatement of the year!



--

I fully support the Know Code debate.
Loud is Good. It lets you trample over M3s and other undesirables.

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

Orator For Decency wrote:
You seem to be a Confused Babbler (CBer)

poor coward always afraid of THEM

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

"an Old friend" wrote:

why is this xxxx being corsposeted to the states it concerns england
and english affair it is not the place of American has to make coment
on it


i dunno... why is it ?

2006 - The year that the RSCB goes bust?
 

"Orator For Decency" wrote in message
oups.com...
You seem to be a Confused Babbler (CBer)

You have just upbraided me for discussing matters
of Britland, and now, here you are doing the same,
because Ofcom is a Britland institution.

(Cross-posted to rec.radio.cb to put you back where you
belong; you certainly exhibited Childish Broadcasting (CB)
in your recent posts)

an Old friend wrote:
Hils wrote:
There's nothing stopping non-members from writing to Ofcom explaining
why they're non-members, and making representations as individuals (for
example, requesting a review of the current licensing scheme).

well making a gues based on how things in Americe Vsav the ARRL and FCC
the indivgual Hams are largely un willing to stand up and say something
with some kind of Occifcail scation for it, this si likly why there
were about 3000 coment the recent NPRM here in the USA out of 600,000
hams and about 300,000 arrl memebrs

Don't give him to us, the CB'ers don't want him.