| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Really Hans, no call to be rude
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 13:12:33 -0500, wrote: (Jeffrey Herman) wrote: wrote: If you don't like qrp (personaly don't see the point) ... I'm holding a home-built 40m QRP xmtr with only 27 components. Imagine that -- a few hours spent scrounging through my parts boxes, winding some coils, soldering everything together, and as if my magic, I'm on 40m CW. Now do you see the point? 73, Jeff KH6O I aslo dont like poeple that show off there buliding equipment abilites makes you sound like a showoff I raelly dont like 40 mters or cw forthat matter etiher. I tryed to get my lsisnce once but the doctor wont coroperate at all He's part of Stevie's forging crew. He likes to pretend his isnt but he is because he was catched at it by someone I know. He is probaly making up the building **** to. Tood, NOGL _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Really Hans, no call to be rude
wrote:
I aslo dont like poeple that show off there buliding equipment abilites makes you sound like a showoff If you knew anything about the history of amateur radio, then you'd know there was a time when all hams had to build all their equipment practically from scratch I raelly dont like 40 mters or cw forthat matter etiher. I tryed to get my lsisnce once but the doctor wont coroperate at all Whatever. No 73 for you, Jeff KH6O -- Chief Petty Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Mathematics Lecturer, University of Hawaii System |
Really Hans, no call to be rude
In article , NOGL wrote:
I aslo dont like poeple that show off there buliding equipment abilites makes you sound like a showoff I raelly dont like 40 mters or cw forthat matter etiher. I tryed to get my lsisnce once but the doctor wont coroperate at all He's part of Stevie's forging crew. He likes to pretend his isnt but he is because he was catched at it by someone I know. He is probaly making up the building **** to. Replying to your own posts? Isn't that called self-abuse? =:o Jeff KH6O -- Chief Petty Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Mathematics Lecturer, University of Hawaii System |
Really Hans, no call to be rude
From: Jeffrey Herman on Jan 1, 3:27 pm
wrote: I aslo dont like poeple that show off there buliding equipment abilites makes you sound like a showoff If you knew anything about the history of amateur radio, then you'd know there was a time when all hams had to build all their equipment practically from scratch Jeff, this new year (2006) is NOT 1896...when radio was first demonstrated as a communications meadium. This isn't 1906 either, a time when practically ALL radios, amateur or commercial, had to be "built from scratch." Today, if you have the "scratch," you can CHOOSE to either build a radio from components (dozens of major parts vendors) or buy them ready-made, ready-to-use. If you look at "shack photos" in the ham publications from the last half century of issues, you will see MOST of them contain ready-built radio equipment. In my career experience I've learned to not only DESIGN radio equipment of many types but have learned all the steps to fabricate them, test them in the lab, test them in the field. But, that's "hands-on engineering responsibility" and is NOT a requirement for an amateur radio license nor is it a requirement to use radios. I can - and have - done just that..."building from scratch" but only because I WANTED to do so for myself. Most of my radio-electronics equipment is ready-built, not because I "can't do it" (I can) but because it is much, much easier for me to do so. Amateur radio is a HOBBY, not a union, craft, or guild. Nowhere is there a die-hard "necessity" to retain ALL the "traditions" such as "building from scratch" as it had to be done a hundred years ago. Now, if you want to "build from scratch" totally, you will have to learn to SUCK all the air out of the tubes you build for yourself (honoring the "tradition"). That's rather difficult (truly, vacuum sucks)...but much, much easier than first creating ultra-pure silicon and then doping the microscopic areas on it to become the solid-state device you need. [sorry you can't build "spark" transmitters...those being forbidden in these modern times unlike a hundred years ago] Heh heh, I was born not too far from Galena, IL, where the vital "crystals" for the first crystal receiving sets were obtained. My first "radio" was a Philmore crystal set KIT with the galena crystal already mined and mounted in a piece of lead (circa 1946). :-) Whatever. Try to remain one of the "higher class" of amateurs, Jeff, don't admonish everyone who doesn't share your opinions. It's fine and dandy you are a rapid-fire morseman, thanks to the USCG. However, the USCG isn't amateur radio. Neither is the University of Hawaii where you "lecture" students at a community college. Morsemanship necessity for federal permission to operate amateur equipment below 30 MHz is on the way OUT. Try to accept that. Don't try to teach your grandmother to suck eggs, either. No 73 for you, ...and none for you either. shrug Good luck on your efforts to ENFORCE TRADITION and bringing back the home-built spark transmitter a la 1906... Sincerely, |
Really Hans, no call to be rude
Jeffrey Herman wrote: wrote: I aslo dont like poeple that show off there buliding equipment abilites makes you sound like a showoff If you knew anything about the history of amateur radio, then you'd know there was a time when all hams had to build all their equipment practically from scratch first of all you are responding to a forger rather than me but you are the ass for assuming you know that I or anybody else knows or doesn't know about history I raelly dont like 40 mters or cw forthat matter etiher. I tryed to get my lsisnce once but the doctor wont coroperate at all Whatever. No 73 for you, Jeff KH6O ty for that i don't care for the dw nonsense -- Chief Petty Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Mathematics Lecturer, University of Hawaii System |
Really Hans, no call to be rude
Jeffrey Herman wrote: In article , NOGL wrote: I aslo dont like poeple that show off there buliding equipment abilites makes you sound like a showoff I raelly dont like 40 mters or cw forthat matter etiher. I tryed to get my lsisnce once but the doctor wont coroperate at all He's part of Stevie's forging crew. He likes to pretend his isnt but he is because he was catched at it by someone I know. He is probaly making up the building **** to. Replying to your own posts? Isn't that called self-abuse? =:o maybe you should be reported to university if you truely cnt read any better than you seem to Jeff KH6O -- Chief Petty Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Mathematics Lecturer, University of Hawaii System |
Really Hans, no call to be rude
On 1 Jan 2006 17:28:30 -0800, an Old friend wrote: Jeffrey Herman wrote: In article , NOGL wrote: I aslo dont like poeple that show off there buliding equipment abilites makes you sound like a showoff I raelly dont like 40 mters or cw forthat matter etiher. I tryed to get my lsisnce once but the doctor wont coroperate at all He's part of Stevie's forging crew. He likes to pretend his isnt but he is because he was catched at it by someone I know. He is probaly making up the building **** to. Replying to your own posts? Isn't that called self-abuse? =:o maybe you should be reported to university if you truely cnt read any better than you seem to You are not fooling anyone Steve. Mark woudn't be that rude to someone and you knows it YOU BITCHWHORE!!!!! _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Really Hans, no call to be rude
In article , NOGL wrote:
maybe you should be reported to university if you truely cnt read any better than you seem to Please do. They claim to be the model for free speech. No 73 for you, Jeff KH6O -- Chief Petty Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Mathematics Lecturer, University of Hawaii System |
Really Hans, no call to be rude
Jeffrey Herman wrote: In article , NOGL wrote: maybe you should be reported to university if you truely cnt read any better than you seem to Please do. They claim to be the model for free speech. obbviously you realy can't read ggod thing I don't know anyone attening the UoH BTW as a abeleiver in motivation is all why is it that you only made CPO not some officer rank, or for that matter why was your motivation only enough to be a lecurer, not a full professor or even dept head of Mathematics?? obvisoly a lack of motivation? or is it simplier to simply tell the truth you were lying when you claimed motivation was everything No 73 for you, Jeff KH6O -- Chief Petty Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Mathematics Lecturer, University of Hawaii System |
Really Hans, no call to be rude
|
Really Hans, no call to be rude
From: (Jeffrey Herman) on Tues, Jan 3 2006 6:57 am
On 1 Jan 2006 16:52:58 -0800, wrote in Now, if you want to "build from scratch" totally, you will have to learn to SUCK all the air out of the tubes you build for yourself (honoring the "tradition"). That's rather difficult (truly, vacuum sucks)...but much, much easier than first creating ultra-pure silicon and then doping the microscopic areas on it to become the solid-state device you need. [sorry you can't build "spark" transmitters...those being forbidden in these modern times unlike a hundred years ago] There was a fellow who did construct his own tubes. See the publication "50 Years of ARRL". Jeffie, if it's all the same to you (and it won't be), I'll just "see" some professional documents from RCA, GE, Raytheon, Westinghouse, etc., on "constructing" tubes. They've had a few years of experience in that, wouldn't you say? I'd have to travel a few thousand miles away to get most of that info and there's little return-on- investment of my time to do that in order to satisfy a league Believer. Not this week for me. Frank Gilliland thoughtfully provided a link to an EXPERIMENTER'S website on the "constructing" of tubes. Further, having been in correspondence with G0UPL in the UK, I have some further links (and some interesting downloads) on making one's own glow-discharge numeric indicator ("Nixie" tm of Burroughs Corp.) displays. All that might be academically intersting to leaf through to some...who will probably never ever pull a good vacuum for any purpose (other than getting a vacuous response in newsgroupie-ism). I really DON'T think it is interesting to me to know all about "constructing vacuum tubes" as given by some amateur radio membership organization publication. Tubes (vacuum tubes, that is) can still be purchased where needed for replacement purposes. The cost is 5 to 20 times what it once was (depending on demand), but then there's not much of a demand for those things. "Constructing" a vacuum tube innards is relatively easy. The truly difficult part is pulling a good vacuum on the bulb and getting rid of extraneous gasses within. Now, I've had some slight experience on "pulling a good vacuum" for testing purposes and that requires considerable work and expensive equipment. [Torricelli would be amazed at the processes used over a half-century ago in production vacuum tube work] Better yet, Jeffie, why don't you get REALLY "build- from-scratch" and go mine natural quartz in Brazil, then bring it home to the islands and slice it up to the right crystal angle, grind it down to the right thickness, measure it to better than 10 PPM in frequency, mount it in your own holder, and use it for your super-spay-shull build-it-yourself super-duper QRP transmitter for use in the year 2006? Gosh, I think re-visiting the 1920s in amateur radio is such great fun in building-it-oneself, don't you? :-) I'll bet you even have a forge and an anvil so that you can make horseshoes for your land transport. Real do-it- yourself projects with a practical side! Have you slaughtered and skinned animals, cured the hides, sewn the leather pieces together to make a saddle for that land transport? Does the ARRL have a publication covering that? Why not? The Army Signal Corps designed and had Motorola make a "horse mobile" two-way HF radio in 1943. It was called "the pogo stick." Of course the mounted cavalry was disbanded before production was finished, but that's another story entirely. Start preparing for your regular work. Classes begin on 9 Jan 06, don't they? Thank you ever so much and buy, buy, |
Really Hans, no call to be rude
Jeffrey Herman wrote: On 1 Jan 2006 16:52:58 -0800, wrote in Now, if you want to "build from scratch" totally, you will have to learn to SUCK all the air out of the tubes you build for yourself (honoring the "tradition"). That's rather difficult (truly, vacuum sucks)...but much, much easier than first creating ultra-pure silicon and then doping the microscopic areas on it to become the solid-state device you need. [sorry you can't build "spark" transmitters...those being forbidden in these modern times unlike a hundred years ago] It's so easy to look up facts nowadays, I'm surprised that you were unable to find this: "A 17-year-old named Haddaway had built his entire station from absolute scratch, including the making of his own vacuum tubes...." QST February 1921. See? Fact, not an opinion attempted to be passed as a fact. You should try that sometime. But then that would be impossible for you, for you'd have to list references. did you check the date? are you aware of the current date? can you in fact read what lens writes? you tnagental responses are looking like stevie of number of years back, things have not turned out wel for him He never said someone could not make a vacum tube, indeed I suspect that some my own gear could the job fair well with some adaption (a vacuam system able to do metal dosipiting on telscope mirror should be ale to manage it) you over look the point, which sesm to be your specail forte? the tech is anceint obselte while not usless, but certainly not of generla interest to all hams Jeff KH6O -- Chief Petty Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Mathematics Lecturer, University of Hawaii System again where was the motivation petty officer and lectureur? |
Really Hans, no call to be rude
wrote: From: (Jeffrey Herman) on Tues, Jan 3 2006 6:57 am On 1 Jan 2006 16:52:58 -0800, wrote in Now, if you want to "build from scratch" totally, you will have to learn to SUCK all the air out of the tubes you build for yourself (honoring the "tradition"). That's rather difficult (truly, vacuum sucks)...but much, much easier than first creating ultra-pure silicon and then doping the microscopic areas on it to become the solid-state device you need. [sorry you can't build "spark" transmitters...those being forbidden in these modern times unlike a hundred years ago] There was a fellow who did construct his own tubes. See the publication "50 Years of ARRL". Jeffie...(SNIP)...No need to go any further. In as much as Jeff has NOT used such diminutives for Len, I wonder where Markie's righteous indignation about "rudeness" is...?!?! Or does such "indignation" not extend to others outside the Circle of the Feeble Five? Steve, K4YZ |
QRP is for Sissies!
an_old_friend wrote: Jeffrey Herman wrote: In article , NOGL wrote: maybe you should be reported to university if you truely cnt read any better than you seem to Please do. They claim to be the model for free speech. obbviously you realy can't read ggod thing I don't know anyone attening the UoH Nor would you be allowed TO attend "UoH" with THAT grammar. BTW as a abeleiver in motivation is all why is it that you only made CPO not some officer rank...(SNIP) BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA!!!! Yet one more example of why it's obvious Markie was NEVER in ANY branch of the Armed Forces... One does not "only" make Chief Petty Officer in ANY rate in the Navy OR Coast Guard, Markie. The course work, pre-requisites, examination process and selection boards are grueling! (UNSNIP)...or for that matter why was your motivation only enough to be a lecurer, not a full professor or even dept head of Mathematics?? Who's to say he's not headed that way? Please, Markie...P L E A S E cite for us YOUR qualifications in ANY occupational field other than aggitating, muck raking, lie telling and deceit, OK...?!?! Schools? Certificates? Programs? Awards? (We'll even accept "Head Start") Steve, K4YZ |
Really Hans, no call to be rude
On 3 Jan 2006 23:29:51 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: From: (Jeffrey Herman) on Tues, Jan 3 2006 6:57 am On 1 Jan 2006 16:52:58 -0800, wrote in Now, if you want to "build from scratch" totally, you will have to learn to SUCK all the air out of the tubes you build for yourself (honoring the "tradition"). That's rather difficult (truly, vacuum sucks)...but much, much easier than first creating ultra-pure silicon and then doping the microscopic areas on it to become the solid-state device you need. [sorry you can't build "spark" transmitters...those being forbidden in these modern times unlike a hundred years ago] There was a fellow who did construct his own tubes. See the publication "50 Years of ARRL". Jeffie...(SNIP)...No need to go any further. In as much as Jeff has NOT used such diminutives for Len, I wonder where Markie's righteous indignation about "rudeness" is...?!?! stevei other than you justlied and therefore it seems abused another kid I have never claim this exact tit for tat you seem to obseesed with Jeff manner is insulting there "jeffie" or" asshole"" or moran or whatever Len chooses to use is proper Or does such "indignation" not extend to others outside the Circle of the Feeble Five? Steve, K4YZ everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 well stevie you assked for it you got it Mark Morgan _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Really Hans, no call to be rude
K4YZ wrote: wrote: From: (Jeffrey Herman) on Tues, Jan 3 2006 6:57 am On 1 Jan 2006 16:52:58 -0800, wrote in Now, if you want to "build from scratch" totally, you will have to learn to SUCK all the air out of the tubes you build for yourself (honoring the "tradition"). That's rather difficult (truly, vacuum sucks)...but much, much easier than first creating ultra-pure silicon and then doping the microscopic areas on it to become the solid-state device you need. [sorry you can't build "spark" transmitters...those being forbidden in these modern times unlike a hundred years ago] There was a fellow who did construct his own tubes. See the publication "50 Years of ARRL". Jeffie...(SNIP)...No need to go any further. In as much as Jeff has NOT used such diminutives for Len, I wonder where Markie's righteous indignation about "rudeness" is...?!?! Here it is: "Raped an old friend." Or does such "indignation" not extend to others outside the Circle of the Feeble Five? Steve, K4YZ Some things are worth being indignant about, for example" "Raped an old friend." |
Really Hans, no call to be rude
On 4 Jan 2006 14:51:01 -0800, wrote:
K4YZ wrote: wrote: From: (Jeffrey Herman) on Tues, Jan 3 2006 6:57 am On 1 Jan 2006 16:52:58 -0800, wrote in Now, if you want to "build from scratch" totally, you will have to learn to SUCK all the air out of the tubes you build for yourself (honoring the "tradition"). That's rather difficult (truly, vacuum sucks)...but much, much easier than first creating ultra-pure silicon and then doping the microscopic areas on it to become the solid-state device you need. [sorry you can't build "spark" transmitters...those being forbidden in these modern times unlike a hundred years ago] There was a fellow who did construct his own tubes. See the publication "50 Years of ARRL". Jeffie...(SNIP)...No need to go any further. In as much as Jeff has NOT used such diminutives for Len, I wonder where Markie's righteous indignation about "rudeness" is...?!?! Here it is: "Raped an old friend." Or does such "indignation" not extend to others outside the Circle of the Feeble Five? Steve, K4YZ Some things are worth being indignant about, for example" "Raped an old friend." well said everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 well stevie you assked for it you got it Mark Morgan _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Really Hans, no call to be rude
On 4 Jan 2006 18:37:06 -0800, wrote:
wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 14:51:01 -0800, wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: From: (Jeffrey Herman) on Tues, Jan 3 2006 6:57 am On 1 Jan 2006 16:52:58 -0800, wrote in Now, if you want to "build from scratch" totally, you will have to learn to SUCK all the air out of the tubes you build for yourself (honoring the "tradition"). That's rather difficult (truly, vacuum sucks)...but much, much easier than first creating ultra-pure silicon and then doping the microscopic areas on it to become the solid-state device you need. [sorry you can't build "spark" transmitters...those being forbidden in these modern times unlike a hundred years ago] There was a fellow who did construct his own tubes. See the publication "50 Years of ARRL". Jeffie...(SNIP)...No need to go any further. In as much as Jeff has NOT used such diminutives for Len, I wonder where Markie's righteous indignation about "rudeness" is...?!?! Here it is: "Raped an old friend." Or does such "indignation" not extend to others outside the Circle of the Feeble Five? Steve, K4YZ Some things are worth being indignant about, for example" "Raped an old friend." well said It needs said. Steve is a rotten SOB who puts on a squeekie clean appearance for CQ magazine and QST. is is he in CQ I read that one at times but anyone that would appear in QST is supect in my view We KNOW better. sadly we do hard to believe his coworkers don't know it everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 well stevie you assked for it you got it Mark Morgan _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Really Hans, no call to be rude
wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 14:51:01 -0800, wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: From: (Jeffrey Herman) on Tues, Jan 3 2006 6:57 am On 1 Jan 2006 16:52:58 -0800, wrote in Now, if you want to "build from scratch" totally, you will have to learn to SUCK all the air out of the tubes you build for yourself (honoring the "tradition"). That's rather difficult (truly, vacuum sucks)...but much, much easier than first creating ultra-pure silicon and then doping the microscopic areas on it to become the solid-state device you need. [sorry you can't build "spark" transmitters...those being forbidden in these modern times unlike a hundred years ago] There was a fellow who did construct his own tubes. See the publication "50 Years of ARRL". Jeffie...(SNIP)...No need to go any further. In as much as Jeff has NOT used such diminutives for Len, I wonder where Markie's righteous indignation about "rudeness" is...?!?! Here it is: "Raped an old friend." Or does such "indignation" not extend to others outside the Circle of the Feeble Five? Steve, K4YZ Some things are worth being indignant about, for example" "Raped an old friend." well said It needs said. Steve is a rotten SOB who puts on a squeekie clean appearance for CQ magazine and QST. We KNOW better. |
Really Hans, no call to be rude
On 4 Jan 2006 18:37:06 -0800, wrote:
wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 14:51:01 -0800, wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: cut Here it is: "Raped an old friend." Or does such "indignation" not extend to others outside the Circle of the Feeble Five? Steve, K4YZ Some things are worth being indignant about, for example" "Raped an old friend." well said It needs said. Steve is a rotten SOB who puts on a squeekie clean appearance for CQ magazine and QST. stevie thinks he puts a sqeaky clean appearance HERE I realy beleive he does that is the one reason he does in fact firghten me at times We KNOW better. everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 well stevie you assked for it you got it Mark Morgan _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
More Markie Mularkie
wrote: On 3 Jan 2006 23:29:51 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: From: (Jeffrey Herman) on Tues, Jan 3 2006 6:57 am Jeffie...(SNIP)...No need to go any further. In as much as Jeff has NOT used such diminutives for Len, I wonder where Markie's righteous indignation about "rudeness" is...?!?! stevei other than you justlied and therefore it seems abused another kid Markie, you typed more indecipherable words. I have never claim this exact tit for tat you seem to obseesed with What? WHAT are you saying? PLEASE do it in ENGLISH! Jeff manner is insulting there "jeffie" or" ###hole"" or moran or whatever Len chooses to use is proper No, it's not. According to Lennie, anyway. Lennie has blatantly lied in the past stating that he does not sue such dimunuitives where he is not so subjected, but here he is doing it A G A I N ! ! ! ! ! And he has his illiterate Michigan sock puppet to "back him up". He must be sooooooooooooooo proud! Steve, K4YZ |
Feeble Five Flounderings
wrote: wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 14:51:01 -0800, wrote: well said It needs said. Steve is a rotten SOB who puts on a squeekie clean appearance for CQ magazine and QST. We KNOW better. All YOU know, Brainie, is that you try to lie and deceive in this forum and I won't let you get away with it. Real "issues" are not discussed nor "debated" in this "forum". With the lies and innuendo bestowed by you and your bretheren, it's nye-on impossible. And what YOU "know" fits in a thimble, and leaves room for seconds. Steve, K4YZ |
More Markie Mularkie
wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 18:37:06 -0800, wrote: Steve is a rotten SOB who puts on a squeekie clean appearance for CQ magazine and QST. stevie thinks he puts a sqeaky clean appearance HERE I realy beleive he does that is the one reason he does in fact firghten me at times Oh no, Markie, I have NO illusions about having any "sqeaky appearance" in RRAP. Indeed, when one wrestles with pigs, one must expect to get some pig#### on himself. Thankfully I have a gas water heater and shower frequently. You should try it. Steve, K4YZ |
sunking lied fill shit from stve
On 5 Jan 2006 01:24:37 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: On 3 Jan 2006 23:29:51 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: From: (Jeffrey Herman) on Tues, Jan 3 2006 6:57 am Jeffie...(SNIP)...No need to go any further. In as much as Jeff has NOT used such diminutives for Len, I wonder where Markie's righteous indignation about "rudeness" is...?!?! stevei other than you justlied and therefore it seems abused another kid Markie, you typed more indecipherable words. more lies I have never claim this exact tit for tat you seem to obseesed with What? WHAT are you saying? PLEASE do it in ENGLISH! it is in eglish you just don't want to read it which is ok juststopp trying and stopp bitching about it Jeff manner is insulting there "jeffie" or" ###hole"" or moran or whatever Len chooses to use is proper No, it's not. yes it is According to Lennie, anyway. you are not a trustworhthy source onLen has said Lennie has blatantly lied in the past stating that he does not sue such dimunuitives where he is not so subjected, but here he is doing it A G A I N ! ! ! ! ! does not sue? indeed as far as I know he does not sue anyone around neither do you despite claiming you have And he has his illiterate Michigan sock puppet to "back him up". He must be sooooooooooooooo proud! Steve, K4YZ everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 well stevie you assked for it you got it Mark Morgan _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
more slabder from the asshole of RRAP
On 5 Jan 2006 01:39:43 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 18:37:06 -0800, wrote: Steve is a rotten SOB who puts on a squeekie clean appearance for CQ magazine and QST. stevie thinks he puts a sqeaky clean appearance HERE I realy beleive he does that is the one reason he does in fact firghten me at times Oh no, Markie, I have NO illusions about having any "sqeaky appearance" in RRAP. Indeed, when one wrestles with pigs, one must expect to get some pig#### on himself. Thankfully I have a gas water heater and shower frequently. you could telling the truth about people that might be easier You should try it. Steve, K4YZ everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 well stevie you assked for it you got it Mark Morgan _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
more lies from steve
On 5 Jan 2006 01:35:16 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 14:51:01 -0800, wrote: well said It needs said. Steve is a rotten SOB who puts on a squeekie clean appearance for CQ magazine and QST. We KNOW better. All YOU know, Brainie, is that you try to lie and deceive in this forum and I won't let you get away with it. raped an old friend http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...13a0525654b952 Real "issues" are not discussed nor "debated" in this "forum". prehaps the only true sentence you have uttered here today With the lies and innuendo bestowed by you and your bretheren, it's nye-on impossible. raped an old friend " gay lid" mark morgan caught on tape.. those are your lies your inuendo you are the one making sure RRAP is a gutter And what YOU "know" fits in a thimble, and leaves room for seconds. Steve, K4YZ everyone should be advised that The following person has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable STEVEN J ROBESON 151 12TH AVE NW WINCHESTER TN 37398 931-967-6282 well stevie you assked for it you got it Mark Morgan _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
More Markie Mularkie
wrote: On 5 Jan 2006 01:35:16 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 14:51:01 -0800, wrote: well said It needs said. Steve is a rotten SOB who puts on a squeekie clean appearance for CQ magazine and QST. We KNOW better. All YOU know, Brainie, is that you try to lie and deceive in this forum and I won't let you get away with it. raped an old friend I am sure you did. You certainly try in here. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...13a0525654b952 Real "issues" are not discussed nor "debated" in this "forum". prehaps the only true sentence you have uttered here today Nope. One of the many. With the lies and innuendo bestowed by you and your bretheren, it's nye-on impossible. raped an old friend " gay lid" mark morgan caught on tape.. those are your lies your inuendo No lies. No innuendo. you are the one making sure RRAP is a gutter Uh...Lesse who spammed the NG with almost 700 forged posts, most of which were either under stolen e-mail addee's or had profanities in the subject lines...?!?! And what YOU "know" fits in a thimble, and leaves room for seconds. I see you didn't disagree either, Markie. Good for you (for once...) Steve, K4YZ |
Really Hans, no call to be rude
On 03/01/2006 2:03 PM, Jeffrey Herman wrote:
On 1 Jan 2006 16:52:58 -0800, wrote in Now, if you want to "build from scratch" totally, you will have to learn to SUCK all the air out of the tubes you build for yourself (honoring the "tradition"). That's rather difficult (truly, vacuum sucks)...but much, much easier than first creating ultra-pure silicon and then doping the microscopic areas on it to become the solid-state device you need. [sorry you can't build "spark" transmitters...those being forbidden in these modern times unlike a hundred years ago] It's so easy to look up facts nowadays, I'm surprised that you were unable to find this: "A 17-year-old named Haddaway had built his entire station from absolute scratch, including the making of his own vacuum tubes...." QST February 1921. I love hearing about that sort of thing. I recall an article reprinted from a later era describing how an old-timer used to build his own passive components. I actually built my own variable resistor from a test tube full of water and some copper wire from the instructions. Hearing that people would roll (literally) their own capacitors from various conductors and dialectrics really impressed me. If the argument is that it's easier to buy a ready-to-use rig, so be it. If the argument is that this has made do-it-yourself somehow obsolete or less valuable, I have to disagree. QRP still has a lot of that same hobbyist appeal, even now that we have cheap, standard parts to work from, and a pile of modern tools to leverage them. To me, this only suggests that clever operators can design and build even more elegant solutions to the problem of sending an intelligible signal through the air. Doing more with less appeals to my hacker nature (I'm a software developer by trade). I understand this sort of thing has limited appeal for some people, however. As people are fond of saying, there as many ways to enjoy the hobby as there are hobbyists. Heck, even I'm a little afraid of the high-voltage valve guys! This doesn't mean I don't think what they are doing is valuable or interesting. Now, I _really_ need to work on getting my Basic Qualification so I can participate in some meaningful manner. -- cm |
why are you lying?
K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 5 Jan 2006 01:35:16 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 14:51:01 -0800, wrote: well said It needs said. Steve is a rotten SOB who puts on a squeekie clean appearance for CQ magazine and QST. We KNOW better. All YOU know, Brainie, is that you try to lie and deceive in this forum and I won't let you get away with it. raped an old friend I am sure you did. why are you lying? You certainly try in here. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...13a0525654b952 Real "issues" are not discussed nor "debated" in this "forum". prehaps the only true sentence you have uttered here today Nope. One of the many. one of very few With the lies and innuendo bestowed by you and your bretheren, it's nye-on impossible. raped an old friend " gay lid" mark morgan caught on tape.. those are your lies your inuendo No lies. No innuendo. why are you lying? you are the one making sure RRAP is a gutter Uh...Lesse who spammed the NG with almost 700 forged posts, most of which were either under stolen e-mail addee's or had profanities in the subject lines...?!?! you total is over 10,000 most of which contain lies And what YOU "know" fits in a thimble, and leaves room for seconds. I see you didn't disagree either, Markie. wasn't worth answering it is another lie on your part indeed you have no knowledge on which base any claim on what I may know so any statement ayou make about my level of knowledge has to be a lie Good for you (for once...) why are you lying? Steve, K4YZ |
Really Hans, no call to be rude
void * clvrmnky() wrote:
On 03/01/2006 2:03 PM, Jeffrey Herman wrote: On 1 Jan 2006 16:52:58 -0800, wrote in Now, if you want to "build from scratch" totally, you will have to learn to SUCK all the air out of the tubes you build for yourself (honoring the "tradition"). It's so easy to look up facts nowadays, I'm surprised that you were unable to find this: "A 17-year-old named Haddaway had built his entire station from absolute scratch, including the making of his own vacuum tubes...." QST February 1921. I love hearing about that sort of thing. I recall an article reprinted from a later era describing how an old-timer used to build his own passive components. I actually built my own variable resistor from a test tube full of water and some copper wire from the instructions. Hearing that people would roll (literally) their own capacitors from various conductors and dialectrics really impressed me. If the argument is that it's easier to buy a ready-to-use rig, so be it. If the argument is that this has made do-it-yourself somehow obsolete or less valuable, I have to disagree. Exactly. I'll use factory-built gear, but I take comfort in knowing that if necessary (or desired), I can build my own gear, too. 73, Jeff KH6O WC2XSR/12 -- Chief Petty Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Mathematics Lecturer, University of Hawaii System |
Feeble Five Flounderings
K4YZ wrote: wrote: wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 14:51:01 -0800, wrote: well said It needs said. Steve is a rotten SOB who puts on a squeekie clean appearance for CQ magazine and QST. We KNOW better. All YOU know, Brainie, is that you are a bullie and a liar. is that you try to lie and deceive in this forum and I won't let you get away with it. You assume that you have control over other people. You do not. Real "issues" are not discussed nor "debated" in this "forum". Thanks to your fueding with every-damned-body, there very, very little room for actual civil discussion. Thanks a lot. With the lies and innuendo bestowed by you and your bretheren, it's nye-on impossible. Projection. And what YOU "know" fits in a thimble, and leaves room for seconds. Steve, K4YZ More projection. |
Feeble Five Flounderings
wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 14:51:01 -0800, wrote: well said It needs said. Steve is a rotten SOB who puts on a squeekie clean appearance for CQ magazine and QST. We KNOW better. All YOU know, Brainie, is that you are a bullie and a liar. Projecting again, Brain. Projecting! is that you try to lie and deceive in this forum and I won't let you get away with it. You assume that you have control over other people. You do not. But I do. I respond to your comments. You respond in turn. I know that certain comments will elicit certain responses from you. It works. Real "issues" are not discussed nor "debated" in this "forum". Thanks to your fueding with every-damned-body, there very, very little room for actual civil discussion. Thanks a lot. There's an almost unlimited amount of bandwidth here, Brain. If you need THAT much room, then perhaps you need to pare down your rhetoric a bit. And my "arguments" are pretty well narrowed down to you and your Feeble Five bretheren. I can communicate effectively, if not outright get along with, everyone else here fairly well. But then most of the rest of the folks here don't see fit to attack me or to lie in order to get a point across. You and your "brothers" have yet to master that. With the lies and innuendo bestowed by you and your bretheren, it's nye-on impossible. Projection. Nope. Not a bit. And what YOU "know" fits in a thimble, and leaves room for seconds. More projection. Nope. Careful obeservation, evaluation, assessment and summation. Steve, K4YZ |
Steve's Projection
K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 14:51:01 -0800, wrote: well said It needs said. Steve is a rotten SOB who puts on a squeekie clean appearance for CQ magazine and QST. We KNOW better. All YOU know, Brainie, is that you are a bullie and a liar. Projecting again, Brain. Projecting! It's "Brian." is that you try to lie and deceive in this forum and I won't let you get away with it. You assume that you have control over other people. You do not. But I do. I respond to your comments. You respond in turn. I know that certain comments will elicit certain responses from you. It works. Your remarks, "Raped and old friend" have yet to elicit a explanation from you. Asking why you could post anything that despicable brings only silence from you. Real "issues" are not discussed nor "debated" in this "forum". Thanks to your fueding with every-damned-body, there very, very little room for actual civil discussion. Thanks a lot. There's an almost unlimited amount of bandwidth here, Brain. Indeed. Mark showed you that. If you need THAT much room, then perhaps you need to pare down your rhetoric a bit. Mark has asked why you need to comment on a person's sexual orientation in an amateur radio newsgroup. He has also asked you to eliminate your comments on people's sexual orientation in an amateur radio newsgroup. And my "arguments" are pretty well narrowed down to you and your Feeble Five bretheren. I can communicate effectively, if not outright get along with, everyone else here fairly well. Hmmm? Bill Sohl left. Few others are active. Best of luck communicating effectively with "everyone else." But then most of the rest of the folks here don't see fit to attack me or to lie in order to get a point across. Perhaps they think you're not worth the trouble. Others are just tired of your nonsense. You and your "brothers" have yet to master that. There is always your model. Mark has found it very effective. With the lies and innuendo bestowed by you and your bretheren, it's nye-on impossible. Projection. Nope. Not a bit. And what YOU "know" fits in a thimble, and leaves room for seconds. More projection. Nope. Careful obeservation, evaluation, assessment and summation. Steve, K4YZ If you're going to lie about yourself, you might as well make it a big one. And I see you have. |
Steve's Projection
On 14 Jan 2006 10:36:00 -0800, wrote:
K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 14:51:01 -0800, wrote: well said It needs said. Steve is a rotten SOB who puts on a squeekie clean appearance for CQ magazine and QST. We KNOW better. All YOU know, Brainie, is that you are a bullie and a liar. Projecting again, Brain. Projecting! It's "Brian." is that you try to lie and deceive in this forum and I won't let you get away with it. You assume that you have control over other people. You do not. But I do. I respond to your comments. You respond in turn. I know that certain comments will elicit certain responses from you. It works. dud you catch here where he said he get the posts he wants in rsponse? mean he wanted to use his daughter name etc, since he claims he is in control but if he is in control the respoblity is HIS Your remarks, "Raped and old friend" have yet to elicit a explanation from you. yes that has he claimed I deserved Asking why you could post anything that despicable brings only silence from you. Real "issues" are not discussed nor "debated" in this "forum". Thanks to your fueding with every-damned-body, there very, very little room for actual civil discussion. Thanks a lot. There's an almost unlimited amount of bandwidth here, Brain. Indeed. Mark showed you that. and stve did not like it If you need THAT much room, then perhaps you need to pare down your rhetoric a bit. Mark has asked why you need to comment on a person's sexual orientation in an amateur radio newsgroup. He has also asked you to eliminate your comments on people's sexual orientation in an amateur radio newsgroup. And my "arguments" are pretty well narrowed down to you and your Feeble Five bretheren. I can communicate effectively, if not outright get along with, everyone else here fairly well. Hmmm? Bill Sohl left. Few others are active. Best of luck communicating effectively with "everyone else." as I said I will try to bring down the house rather than leave it as Steve own personal abuse chamber But then most of the rest of the folks here don't see fit to attack me or to lie in order to get a point across. Perhaps they think you're not worth the trouble. Others are just tired of your nonsense. or they lack the abilty to step aside form their feeling for awhile and give you the treatement you give others You and your "brothers" have yet to master that. There is always your model. Mark has found it very effective. very efective indeed, disagreeable but effective that Only thing I don't unstand is how steve can keep it up all these years without stroking out or uffering some other complete colapse He can't be human in any meaningfull sense With the lies and innuendo bestowed by you and your bretheren, it's nye-on impossible. Projection. Nope. Not a bit. And what YOU "know" fits in a thimble, and leaves room for seconds. More projection. Nope. Careful obeservation, evaluation, assessment and summation. Steve, K4YZ If you're going to lie about yourself, you might as well make it a big one. And I see you have. indeed Steve is clearly a student of Herr Geobels (or a student of one his student) _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Brain Bouncing Blindly,
wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: wrote: On 4 Jan 2006 14:51:01 -0800, wrote: well said It needs said. Steve is a rotten SOB who puts on a squeekie clean appearance for CQ magazine and QST. We KNOW better. All YOU know, Brainie, is that you are a bullie and a liar. Projecting again, Brain. Projecting! It's "Brian." Is it? Why don't you sign your posts like a man and show us all, Brain? is that you try to lie and deceive in this forum and I won't let you get away with it. You assume that you have control over other people. You do not. But I do. I respond to your comments. You respond in turn. I know that certain comments will elicit certain responses from you. It works. Your remarks, "Raped and old friend" have yet to elicit a explanation from you. No explanation was necessary. Asking why you could post anything that despicable brings only silence from you. How is it despicable? Markie has proudly boasted of perverted sexual and other personal preferneces, and did at one time indicate a prediliction for forceful sex, domineering relationships. Real "issues" are not discussed nor "debated" in this "forum". Thanks to your fueding with every-damned-body, there very, very little room for actual civil discussion. Thanks a lot. There's an almost unlimited amount of bandwidth here, Brain. Indeed. Mark showed you that. What Mark "showed me" had nothing to do with bandwidth and everything to do with his mental defect, Brain. Your on-going defense of him shows me (and the rest of the NG) yours. If you need THAT much room, then perhaps you need to pare down your rhetoric a bit. Mark has asked why you need to comment on a person's sexual orientation in an amateur radio newsgroup. He has also asked you to eliminate your comments on people's sexual orientation in an amateur radio newsgroup. He has. And I answered him. His response was to go on the aforementioned tirade. I've asked YOU why you insist on suggesting that others act one way and then do it yourself. You've answered with YOUR silence. And my "arguments" are pretty well narrowed down to you and your Feeble Five bretheren. I can communicate effectively, if not outright get along with, everyone else here fairly well. Hmmm? Bill Sohl left. Few others are active. Best of luck communicating effectively with "everyone else." You're here. What's YOUR excuse? Where's YOUR "meaningful debate" or "thoughtful intercourse"...?!?! Where are the answers to questions put ot you YEARS AGO on subjects you thought you'd never be challenged on, yet can't seem to get past...?!?! But then most of the rest of the folks here don't see fit to attack me or to lie in order to get a point across. Perhaps they think you're not worth the trouble. Others are just tired of your nonsense. Perhaps they won the lottery. Perhaps I'm not the only one that they have a "problem" with. MOST LIKELY is that this NG has accomplished exactly SQUAT, even when there was "meaningful intercourse". On the otherhand, one of my pieces in this forum was a featured article in Worldradio magazine (for which I was paid a fee, however I returned it uncashed). My comments are routinely quoted in "CQ" magazine. Myself and several other regular posters appear in various "CQ" quotes on a semi-frequent basis. And we have YET to see "N0IMD" in ANY such role. Not even a mention as a "slim" in any DX journal during "Restore Hope". Nor do we see KB9RQZ, N9OGL, Frankie of Silliland nor Lennie the Loser. You and your "brothers" have yet to master that. There is always your model. Mark has found it very effective. You better redirect credit where credit is due...To your "brother" in California. With the lies and innuendo bestowed by you and your bretheren, it's nye-on impossible. Projection. Nope. Not a bit. And what YOU "know" fits in a thimble, and leaves room for seconds. More projection. Nope. Careful obeservation, evaluation, assessment and summation. Steve, K4YZ If you're going to lie about yourself, you might as well make it a big one. And I see you have. See what? (Step away from the mirror and try again, Brain...You're confusing yourself....) Steve, K4YZ |
Brain Bouncing Blindly,
On 15 Jan 2006 07:03:18 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: cut is that you try to lie and deceive in this forum and I won't let you get away with it. You assume that you have control over other people. You do not. But I do. I respond to your comments. You respond in turn. I know that certain comments will elicit certain responses from you. It works. Your remarks, "Raped and old friend" have yet to elicit a explanation from you. No explanation was necessary. Asking why you could post anything that despicable brings only silence from you. How is it despicable? Markie has proudly boasted of perverted Proudly boasted? how did I do this? after some of the barbarian (including yourself) went digging around and reposted materail that I am not ashamed (just never thought they belonged her) I admknowledged them and we tried to go but you keep making a big deal of so I defend my right to be and to do what I wish amoug consetning adult if that is "Boasteing" sexual and other personal preferneces, and did at one time indicate a prediliction for forceful sex, domineering relationships. so what? I like dominating sex amoug consenting adults that is not rape and it does not cover Mark morgan caught on tape.... why do you post despticble thing about ywhy do you lie about them the health of their families Real "issues" are not discussed nor "debated" in this "forum". Thanks to your fueding with every-damned-body, there very, very little room for actual civil discussion. Thanks a lot. There's an almost unlimited amount of bandwidth here, Brain. Indeed. Mark showed you that. What Mark "showed me" had nothing to do with bandwidth and everything to do with his mental defect, Brain. self denefsen is a mnetal defect ok so you think so Your on-going defense of him shows me (and the rest of the NG) yours. If you need THAT much room, then perhaps you need to pare down your rhetoric a bit. Mark has asked why you need to comment on a person's sexual orientation in an amateur radio newsgroup. He has also asked you to eliminate your comments on people's sexual orientation in an amateur radio newsgroup. He has. And I answered him. no you have not you lied saying that you not bring it iI did not does not answer why you brought it up in the first place His response was to go on the aforementioned tirade. I've asked YOU why you insist on suggesting that others act one way and then do it yourself. becuase he does not you do explain yourself it my job or bb to explain your behavour You've answered with YOUR silence. what was your question? And my "arguments" are pretty well narrowed down to you and your Feeble Five bretheren. I can communicate effectively, if not outright get along with, everyone else here fairly well. Hmmm? Bill Sohl left. Few others are active. Best of luck communicating effectively with "everyone else." You're here. What's YOUR excuse? what exucse does he need Where's YOUR "meaningful debate" or "thoughtful intercourse"...?!?! ghe has particated in every on topic thread int he NG as theycoame with disrupting them as I have I you havebn't indeed you have tried (and many cases suceeded in disputed such threads Where are the answers to questions put ot you YEARS AGO on subjects you thought you'd never be challenged on, yet can't seem to get past...?!?! they will be answered after you answer yours no doubt But then most of the rest of the folks here don't see fit to attack me or to lie in order to get a point across. Perhaps they think you're not worth the trouble. Others are just tired of your nonsense. Perhaps they won the lottery. Perhaps I'm not the only one that they have a "problem" with. prehaps MOST LIKELY is that this NG has accomplished exactly SQUAT, even when there was "meaningful intercourse". perhaps On the otherhand, one of my pieces in this forum was a featured article in Worldradio magazine (for which I was paid a fee, however I returned it uncashed). My comments are routinely quoted in "CQ" magazine. Myself and several other regular posters appear in various "CQ" quotes on a semi-frequent basis. so what? And we have YET to see "N0IMD" in ANY such role. Not even a mention as a "slim" in any DX journal during "Restore Hope". Nor do we see KB9RQZ, N9OGL, Frankie of Silliland nor Lennie the Loser. a lie steve your self complented me on something in CQ VHF You and your "brothers" have yet to master that. There is always your model. Mark has found it very effective. You better redirect credit where credit is due...To your "brother" in California. nope len is not my model you are steve With the lies and innuendo bestowed by you and your bretheren, it's nye-on impossible. Projection. Nope. Not a bit. And what YOU "know" fits in a thimble, and leaves room for seconds. More projection. Nope. Careful obeservation, evaluation, assessment and summation. Steve, K4YZ If you're going to lie about yourself, you might as well make it a big one. And I see you have. See what? (Step away from the mirror and try again, Brain...You're confusing yourself....) npe you are projecting it i quite to claer everyone but you and dave Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
More Markie Mularkie
|
more shit filled trash from steve
K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 15 Jan 2006 07:03:18 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: There's an almost unlimited amount of bandwidth here, Brain. Indeed. Mark showed you that. What Mark "showed me" had nothing to do with bandwidth and everything to do with his mental defect, Brain. self denefsen is a mnetal defect What's "denefsen"...?!?! Mark has asked why you need to comment on a person's sexual orientation in an amateur radio newsgroup. He has also asked you to eliminate your comments on people's sexual orientation in an amateur radio newsgroup. He has. And I answered him. no you have not Sure I have. nope you have never posted anything about why you brought it concerning me and Todd and Frank |
a lie by steve or just his megalomania either way he trips himself up
On 14 Jan 2006 06:54:04 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: K4YZ wrote: cut is that you try to lie and deceive in this forum and I won't let you get away with it. You assume that you have control over other people. You do not. But I do. I respond to your comments. You respond in turn. I know that certain comments will elicit certain responses from you. It works. then according to wat you typed there everything I said or done in here is repsonse to waht you wanted and that it was under your control this stament would mean that you have no case a for suit (but we already knew that) and cleary that you want RRAp to exist in the sewer you are in control of us you claimed it, therefore the result are exactly as you wish _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:14 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com