| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
new ham experimenter board
At VHF and up, wavelength become short enough that wires which conect chips together on PC board can radiate or can look like not a wire at all. That why modern PC board maker use transmission line theory to design traces on board. Otherwise it could mallfunction. My new ham experimenter board have free computer programs which I wrote for PC board design stuff. They writen in C++ for OS-X but probaly work for other computers to. Need more programs for library so why not join and contribuite your stuff to ham library? any ham radio program welcome and not just PC board stuff but we only want ham programers right now because if can't program you are not real experimenter ham. Tood, NO9GL |
new ham experimenter board - roger.JPG (0/1)
LARDASS LLOYD DAVIES THE ATHENS COWARD wrote: On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 15:57:30 +0000 (UTC), (NO9GL) wrote: At VHF and up, wavelength become short enough that wires which conect chips together on PC board can radiate or can look like not a wire at all. That why modern PC board maker use transmission line theory to design traces on board. Otherwise it could mallfunction. My new ham experimenter board have free computer programs which I wrote for PC board design stuff. They writen in C++ for OS-X but probaly work for other computers to. Need more programs for library so why not join and contribuite your stuff to ham library? any ham radio program welcome and not just PC board stuff but we only want ham programers right now because if can't program you are not real experimenter ham. Tood, NO9GL Do you except losers like me in your group? Yes, fatass Davies, tell us why you are stil a virgin at 32 years of age. |
bs
|
bs
raped an_old_friend wrote: wrote: Yes, fatass Davies, tell us why you are stil a virgin at 32 years of age. stil obessed with sex Still an imbecile are you, Markie? |
bs
N0VFP wrote: raped an_old_friend wrote: wrote: Yes, fatass Davies, tell us why you are stil a virgin at 32 years of age. stil obessed with sex Still an imbecile are you, Markie? nope but you are still sexualy obessed as you alteration proves get mental help prevert BTW why are you obeseed with alt.test have extra tests on your mind 2 test |
bs
assraped an_old_friend wrote:
N0VFP wrote: raped an_old_friend wrote: wrote: Yes, fatass Davies, tell us why you are stil a virgin at 32 years of age. stil obessed with sex Still an imbecile are you, Markie? nope but you are still sexualy obessed as you alteration proves Yep, you are, stupid. get mental help prevert You'll be back in your old rubber room soon, Markie. BTW why are you obeseed with alt.test BTW, it's just another tweak to make you whine, ****. have extra tests on your mind 2 test Wrong again, dumbass. At least Roger could pass it, unlike you, who took at least 10 tries to pass that General the first time. |
new ham experimenter board - roger.JPG (0/1)
Why do you have such an obsession with Lloyd? Is it because he rejected
queers like you? Because maybe he has more of a life than you? Of course, when you live in Glen Dale there isn't much else to do. Except jam 20 and 75 meters and cuss at people on usenet Isn't that right 2 Test? Or is it because you are a product of incest? So have you been getting letters lately for retesting? wrote in message oups.com... LARDASS LLOYD DAVIES THE ATHENS COWARD wrote: On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 15:57:30 +0000 (UTC), (NO9GL) wrote: At VHF and up, wavelength become short enough that wires which conect chips together on PC board can radiate or can look like not a wire at all. That why modern PC board maker use transmission line theory to design traces on board. Otherwise it could mallfunction. My new ham experimenter board have free computer programs which I wrote for PC board design stuff. They writen in C++ for OS-X but probaly work for other computers to. Need more programs for library so why not join and contribuite your stuff to ham library? any ham radio program welcome and not just PC board stuff but we only want ham programers right now because if can't program you are not real experimenter ham. Tood, NO9GL Do you except losers like me in your group? Yes, fatass Davies, tell us why you are stil a virgin at 32 years of age. |
bs
Still a ******* child right boy? Yep you are.
"N0VFP" wrote in message oups.com... raped an_old_friend wrote: wrote: Yes, fatass Davies, tell us why you are stil a virgin at 32 years of age. stil obessed with sex Still an imbecile are you, Markie? |
bs
wrote in message oups.com... assraped an_old_friend wrote: N0VFP wrote: raped an_old_friend wrote: wrote: Yes, fatass Davies, tell us why you are stil a virgin at 32 years of age. stil obessed with sex Still an imbecile are you, Markie? nope but you are still sexualy obessed as you alteration proves Yep, you are, stupid. get mental help prevert You'll be back in your old rubber room soon, Markie. BTW why are you obeseed with alt.test BTW, it's just another tweak to make you whine, ****. have extra tests on your mind 2 test Wrong again, dumbass. At least Roger could pass it, unlike you, who took at least 10 tries to pass that General the first time. Not to mention the fact you had to retest to keep your license because you were busted jamming 20 meters. Shall we post the letters again. |
new ham experimenter board - roger.JPG (1/1)
Look at that pointy head he has, bwhahahahaha.
"ROGER THE GLENDALE COWARD" WISEMAN@BEHIND THE CURTAINS wrote in message ... _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
new ham experimenter board - roger.JPG (1/1)
Why does he look like one of Manson's followers?
"ROGER THE GLENDALE COWARD" WISEMAN@BEHIND THE CURTAINS wrote in message ... _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Coward of Glendale
"Hot Tamale" wrote in message ink.net... wrote in message oups.com... assraped an_old_friend wrote: N0VFP wrote: raped an_old_friend wrote: wrote: Yes, fatass Davies, tell us why you are stil a virgin at 32 years of age. stil obessed with sex Still an imbecile are you, Markie? nope but you are still sexualy obessed as you alteration proves Yep, you are, stupid. get mental help prevert You'll be back in your old rubber room soon, Markie. BTW why are you obeseed with alt.test BTW, it's just another tweak to make you whine, ****. have extra tests on your mind 2 test Wrong again, dumbass. At least Roger could pass it, unlike you, who took at least 10 tries to pass that General the first time. Not to mention the fact you had to retest to keep your license because you were busted jamming 20 meters. Shall we post the letters again. It will do no good. Woger will claim that he was "invited" to be retested. He claims that since he originally tested via a VEC that Mr. Hollingsworth picked Woger at random. Of course the FCC letters to Woger are, according to Roger, mere "suggestions" and Roger, to this day, maintains that he did nothing wrong though the accusations in Riley's letters are plain to see. Roger continues to pick at definitions so as to salve his warning letters and retest requirements. Bottom line? Roger was forced to retest at the risk of having his Ham license rescinded. Roger HAD to retest. Period. It was that or lose his Ham license. Why? Because Roger caused malicious intererence on several occasions and he got caught. And now the ugly little gnome is moving on to other nefarious activities, including posting filth over the names of others. One has to feel pity for Woger. Look at him...the guy is a virtual Hermit...hides behind drawn blinds, hides behind multiple dialup accounts, will not answer the phone, is afraid to even go to his own front door! Where were YOU at the hamfest, Wogie? Take Lloyd not to task when you were afraid to step into the front door. Coward. Chicken ****. Flatulent Poo-Poo. |
Flatulent Dave Always gets it wrong!
****face Boy Drools wrote: "Hot Tamale" wrote in message ink.net... Hi "Billy" the retard! wrote in message oups.com... assraped an_old_friend wrote: N0VFP wrote: raped an_old_friend wrote: wrote: Yes, fatass Davies, tell us why you are stil a virgin at 32 years of age. stil obessed with sex Still an imbecile are you, Markie? nope but you are still sexualy obessed as you alteration proves Yep, you are, stupid. get mental help prevert You'll be back in your old rubber room soon, Markie. BTW why are you obeseed with alt.test BTW, it's just another tweak to make you whine, ****. have extra tests on your mind 2 test Wrong again, dumbass. At least Roger could pass it, unlike you, who took at least 10 tries to pass that General the first time. Not to mention the fact you had to retest to keep your license because you were busted jamming 20 meters. Shall we post the letters again. Wrong as usual, Lardass! Here's the FCC letter he received (from Hap Holly's site when he posted such letters) ------------ July 11, 2000 CERTIFIED MAIL--RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Roger L. Wiseman 610 Glen Haven Avenue Glendale, WV 26038-1302 SUBJECT: Amateur Radio license KC8JBO Dear Mr. Wiseman: Pursuant to Section 97.519(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 97.519(d)(2), the Commission has the authority to re-administer any examination element previously administered by Volunteer Examiners (VE's). The Commission may either administer the examination itself, or under the supervision of a Volunteer Examiner Coordinator (VEC) or VE designated by the Commission. Accordingly, we are requiring you to re-take the General Class Amateur Examination, (Elements 2, 3(A) and 3(B)) under the supervision of an American Radio Relay League Volunteer Examiner Coordinator. This examination must be completed on or before September 11, 2000. The required code speed that you must demonstrate is 5 words per minute. Please be prepared to verify your current address and to present a photo identification. Pursuant to Commission rules, your license will be cancelled if you do not appear for re-examination. You will be granted an Amateur Radio license consistent with the elements you pass upon re-examination. Sincerely, W. Riley Hollingsworth Special Counsel, Amateur Radio Enforcement Bureau ------------------------------ How does it feel to be such a fool that you can't get your facts straight? From: (LRod) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc Subject: 14.313 Jamming.K9BSD, N9PGE, and KK9G. Message-ID: References: s.it X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243 Lines: 41 X-Trace: npbhgpngjbkmjfegdbdpiflmbcekedmfhojhikkbagflhcboak lfjkplkonophhikjjlgnhjkiogimbnbgackcbpannchokbekkj flfncmkmngeibpdbhojbajjenkiigmijeekfoggfnklbkpodeb jebifnnkim NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 00:27:01 EDT Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 03:14:02 GMT On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:32:06 -0500, "Rick Phillips" NoSpam@NoSpam wrote: If you are going to tell it, tell it straight. THAT person only recieved ONE warning letter and was made to retest, yet the letter did not give interference as being the reason for the retest. This newsgroup has already hashed and rehashed THAT person's retest, ad nauseaum. One letter? No "interference"? Read everything closely. There were three letters sent. The letters to both Wiseman and Tunder were a preemptive "warning" that did not allege any activities. That hardly qualifies as a warning in the context of someone having actually done something. The letter with the warning in it ALLEGED interference, and warned of consequences. The retest letter made no reference to interference; in fact gave no reason for requiring the retest. Such a request is part of the Volunteer Examining program. It could have been made for any number of reasons that may have had nothing to do with any of the addressee's actions. An investigation into the VE group that gave the test, would be a good example. Only one letter was a warning referring to interference. So, yes; if you are going to tell it, tell it straight. LRod Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999 http://www.woodbutcher.net It will do no good. Woger will claim that he was "invited" to be retested. He claims that since he originally tested via a VEC that Mr. Hollingsworth picked Woger at random. The FCC rules are very specific, **** for brains: Pursuant to Section 97.519(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 97.519(d)(2), the Commission has the authority to re-administer any examination element previously administered by Volunteer Examiners (VE's). The Commission may either administer the examination itself, or under the supervision of a Volunteer Examiner Coordinator (VEC) or VE designated by the Commission. Roger continues to pick at definitions so as to salve his warning letters and retest requirements. Bottom line? Roger was forced to retest at the risk of having his Ham license rescinded. Roger HAD to retest. Period. It was that or lose his Ham license. Why? Because Roger caused malicious intererence on several occasions and he got caught. No, stupid: Pursuant to Section 97.519(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 97.519(d)(2), the Commission has the authority to re-administer any examination element previously administered by Volunteer Examiners (VE's). The Commission may either administer the examination itself, or under the supervision of a Volunteer Examiner Coordinator (VEC) or VE designated by the Commission. It wasn't any reason in the retest letter other than that. You are too ****ing stupid to even read what is right in front of you. It wasn't much of a "sanction", for Roger passed it and upgraded. And now the ugly little gnome is moving on to other nefarious activities, including posting filth over the names of others. Hey Dave, here you are posting under another name when you said you don't do such things. You are a liar. And, now, you can go clean out that ugly, Finnish ex-streetwalker's yeasty ****. |
new ham experimenter board - roger.JPG (1/1)
Hot Tamale in queer sex terms wrote: Look at that pointy head he has, bwhahahahaha. Look at your malformed oblong head, yours looks like an Evinrude outboard motor cover, fatass! http://h1.ripway.com/lloyddaviessux/lloyd_is_hungry.jpg |
bs
On 5 Mar 2006 10:03:58 -0800, wrote:
****face Boy Drools wrote: took at least 10 tries to pass that General the first time. Not to mention the fact you had to retest to keep your license because you were busted jamming 20 meters. Shall we post the letters again. Wrong as usual, Lardass! Here's the FCC letter he received (from Hap Holly's site when he posted such letters) so _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
new ham experimenter board - roger.JPG (1/1)
On 5 Mar 2006 10:10:11 -0800, wrote:
Hot Tamale in queer sex terms wrote: Look at that pointy head he has, bwhahahahaha. Look at your malformed oblong head, yours looks like an Evinrude outboard motor cover, fatass! poor jealous mr slit _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
bs
wrote: On 5 Mar 2006 10:03:58 -0800, wrote: ****face Boy Drools wrote: took at least 10 tries to pass that General the first time. Not to mention the fact you had to retest to keep your license because you were busted jamming 20 meters. Shall we post the letters again. Wrong as usual, Lardass! Here's the FCC letter he received (from Hap Holly's site when he posted such letters) so So it proves that the retest wasn't done becuase of "interference," you ****ing imbecile. |
bs
On 5 Mar 2006 10:26:02 -0800, wrote:
wrote: On 5 Mar 2006 10:03:58 -0800, wrote: ****face Boy Drools wrote: took at least 10 tries to pass that General the first time. Not to mention the fact you had to retest to keep your license because you were busted jamming 20 meters. Shall we post the letters again. Wrong as usual, Lardass! Here's the FCC letter he received (from Hap Holly's site when he posted such letters) so So it proves that the retest wasn't done becuase of "interference," you ****ing imbecile. so? interfence or re testing is the subject here _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
new ham experimenter board - roger.JPG (1/1)
On 5 Mar 2006 10:27:16 -0800, wrote:
wrote: On 5 Mar 2006 10:10:11 -0800, wrote: Hot Tamale in queer sex terms wrote: Look at that pointy head he has, bwhahahahaha. Look at your malformed oblong head, yours looks like an Evinrude outboard motor cover, fatass! poor jealous mr slit Of what, being bald at the age of 20??? Looking like a 75 year old man at the age of 32 like Lardass Davies does? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Hardly. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! obviously you obviously desire sex with Mr Davies _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
new ham experimenter board - roger.JPG (1/1)
wrote: On 5 Mar 2006 10:27:16 -0800, wrote: wrote: On 5 Mar 2006 10:10:11 -0800, wrote: Hot Tamale in queer sex terms wrote: Look at that pointy head he has, bwhahahahaha. Look at your malformed oblong head, yours looks like an Evinrude outboard motor cover, fatass! poor jealous mr slit Of what, being bald at the age of 20??? Looking like a 75 year old man at the age of 32 like Lardass Davies does? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Hardly. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! obviously you obviously desire sex with Mr Davies Obviously, you already have. |
bs
wrote: On 5 Mar 2006 10:26:02 -0800, wrote: wrote: On 5 Mar 2006 10:03:58 -0800, wrote: ****face Boy Drools wrote: took at least 10 tries to pass that General the first time. Not to mention the fact you had to retest to keep your license because you were busted jamming 20 meters. Shall we post the letters again. Wrong as usual, Lardass! Here's the FCC letter he received (from Hap Holly's site when he posted such letters) so So it proves that the retest wasn't done because of "interference," you ****ing imbecile. so? interfence or re testing is the subject here Then it doesn't apply in Wiseman's case, does it, dumbass? |
bs
|
bs
Wiseman, you're probably the biggest ****in moron that I have ever
encountered in my years in amateur radio if not usenet. You're useless to the core, ill-educated, and a total moron. It is obvious to see that you're so poorly education that you cannot make logic of the fact that you were retested on the basis of not using good amateur practice. Everyone knows it. What an idiot you truly are. wrote in message oups.com... wrote: On 5 Mar 2006 10:26:02 -0800, wrote: wrote: On 5 Mar 2006 10:03:58 -0800, wrote: ****face Boy Drools wrote: took at least 10 tries to pass that General the first time. Not to mention the fact you had to retest to keep your license because you were busted jamming 20 meters. Shall we post the letters again. Wrong as usual, Lardass! Here's the FCC letter he received (from Hap Holly's site when he posted such letters) so So it proves that the retest wasn't done because of "interference," you ****ing imbecile. so? interfence or re testing is the subject here Then it doesn't apply in Wiseman's case, does it, dumbass? |
bs
You know why he defends him, because he and whinyslit are one in the same.
He's such a delusional ****wit that he cannot keep from speaking in the third person about himself. That's a clear sign of someone in severe mental distress when they have to invent friends to take up a fight. They are the same person posting under different accounts. "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... wrote: Then it doesn't apply in Wiseman's case, does it, dumbass? indeed Mr Wismen does not apply to this NG and yet you obesse indefending him and denieing that you are him |
new ham experimenter board - roger.JPG (1/1)
Look at that ****ty face behind those glasses. The balding and pointy head
protruding like an ass pimple. wrote in message ups.com... Hot Tamale in queer sex terms wrote: Look at that pointy head he has, bwhahahahaha. Look at your malformed oblong head, yours looks like an Evinrude outboard motor cover, fatass! http://h1.ripway.com/lloyddaviessux/lloyd_is_hungry.jpg |
new ham experimenter board - roger.JPG (1/1)
What do you expect of a guy who doesn't have a sex life. Why do you think he
uses Mr. Slit, it just shows what a puss he really is. wrote in message ... On 5 Mar 2006 10:10:11 -0800, wrote: Hot Tamale in queer sex terms wrote: Look at that pointy head he has, bwhahahahaha. Look at your malformed oblong head, yours looks like an Evinrude outboard motor cover, fatass! poor jealous mr slit _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
new ham experimenter board - roger.JPG (1/1)
wrote in message ups.com... wrote: On 5 Mar 2006 10:10:11 -0800, wrote: Hot Tamale in queer sex terms wrote: Look at that pointy head he has, bwhahahahaha. Look at your malformed oblong head, yours looks like an Evinrude outboard motor cover, fatass! poor jealous mr slit Of what, being bald at the age of 20??? Looking like a 75 year old man at the age of 32 like Lardass Davies does? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Hardly. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You sure wouldn't be a person to be jealous of. More like a person to be pitied. No job, no work ethic, lazy, skanky, filthy, ill-educated, need we say more. |
bs
Billy Smith wrote: You know why he defends him, because he and whinyslit are one in the same. He's such a delusional ****wit that he cannot keep from speaking in the third person about himself. That's a clear sign of someone in severe mental distress when they have to invent friends to take up a fight. They are the same person posting under different accounts. I don't this with a level of conviction I would call certainity I suspect it as a high order likelyhood but I don't think about much becuase I barely care they are clearly a person or person (or multible personailites in the same body (a favored thought at the monet) expressing the same stupid and insane ideas, byond that I hardly care for the details after he/they are sicking enough at first reading that I don't want to inquire further "an old friend" wrote in message |
bs
assraped an old friend wrote: wrote: Then it doesn't apply in Wiseman's case, does it, dumbass? indeed Mr Wismen does not apply to this NG and yet you obesse indefending him and denieing that you are him You are ****ing stupid, Markie. There are several of us "defending him" you ****ing ignoramus. |
new ham experimenter board - roger.JPG (1/1)
Billy Smith wrote:
Look at that ****ty face behind those glasses. The balding and pointy head protruding like an ass pimple. Look at yourself, VIRGIN boy! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You are a fatassed ****ing faggot who still hasn't gotten laid. wrote in message ups.com... Hot Tamale in queer sex terms wrote: Look at that pointy head he has, bwhahahahaha. Look at your malformed oblong head, yours looks like an Evinrude outboard motor cover, fatass! http://h1.ripway.com/lloyddaviessux/lloyd_is_hungry.jpg |
new ham experimenter board - roger.JPG (1/1)
Billy Smith wrote: What do you expect of a guy who doesn't have a sex life. HAHAHAHAHAHA, says, faggot "Billy" aka Toodles, who obsesses about a 50 year old man. BAHWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!! BILLY SMITH STEPS ON HIS OWN DICK THUSLY: Billy "Dumbass who can't put together a sentence" Smith shows off those English skills, quite ironically in .net: "That's interesting there idiot. I bet you really did flunk high school math and probably elementary too. Oh thats right, wasn't that when was in Floriduh. Spelled Florida but the DUH is for your Dumb Ass." "wasn't that when was in Floriduh" - Billy makes good **** up! Billy "shoots" himself in his palsied club foot once again in Message-ID: .net: "Roger, shots himself in the foot" Billy the illiterate retard Smith screws up again, and his illiteracy is exposed. "It serves him right." in et: "Deserves him right." Billy "retard" Smith confesses to his generally accepted retarded status in . net: "I'm a general retard. bwhahaha" Billy "spelling champ of the general retards" Smith admits his bad hygiene but is still in denial about his English skills in . net "Sure I can spell and smell." "Billy" the NOtwordSmith ****s up again with this incompete sentence in et: "So when you got divorced boy, did your finally figure out that your more" |
bs
ass****ed an_old_friend wrote: Billy Smith wrote: You know why he defends him, because he and whinyslit are one in the same. He's such a delusional ****wit that he cannot keep from speaking in the third person about himself. That's a clear sign of someone in severe mental distress when they have to invent friends to take up a fight. They are the same person posting under different accounts. So do you, Toad. So do you. Tell us why you post those shemale pics on Nim Busters "Billy." I don't this with a level of conviction You and Billy aka Toad are two ****ing imbeciles, too. |
bs
|
bs
On 6 Mar 2006 12:49:14 -0800, "N0VFP" wrote:
assraped an old friend wrote: wrote: Then it doesn't apply in Wiseman's case, does it, dumbass? indeed Mr Wismen does not apply to this NG and yet you obesse indefending him and denieing that you are him You are ****ing stupid, Markie. There are several of us "defending him" you ****ing ignoramus. that does n't seem to be the case that is to say you are lying _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
new ham experimenter board - roger.JPG (1/1)
|
new ham experimenter board - roger.JPG (1/1)
|
bs
wrote:
On 6 Mar 2006 12:49:14 -0800, "N0VFP" wrote: assraped an old friend wrote: wrote: Then it doesn't apply in Wiseman's case, does it, dumbass? indeed Mr Wismen does not apply to this NG and yet you obesse indefending him and denieing that you are him You are ****ing stupid, Markie. There are several of us "defending him" you ****ing ignoramus. that does n't seem to be the case that is to say you are lying Wrong as usual, ****nuts. |
new ham experimenter board - roger.JPG (1/1)
wrote: more if theft more sexaul obesion |
bs
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote: wrote: On 6 Mar 2006 12:49:14 -0800, "N0VFP" wrote: You are ****ing stupid, Markie. There are several of us "defending him" you ****ing ignoramus. that does n't seem to be the case that is to say you are lying Wrong as usual, ****nuts. an unproven asretion |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:20 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com