Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm going to recommend against electronic feedback unless you are a
control systems hobbyist... I did PID (proportional-integral-derivative) servo on a homebrew rotating mast so I didn't need a readout and eventually decided to go with a rotation sensing pot, a voltage-to-current converter, and a surplus meter. This was after I tweaked the PID to get rid of the oscillations but still had some average position errors... I guess with a digital system it would be easier to optimize. Mine was all analog... and only one op amp, so the settings interacted :-) Making the motor go and watching the meter is a more sensitive and intelligent form of feedback, as long as you've got a system you can't break by turning too far. A simple pulse-width-modulator for speed control might be in the cards though. That way you send a variable duty cycle full-on full-off pulse train to the motor. Good torque and you don't need a variable power supply just to run the rotor. I'm going to add one to my rotator soon... I've got that on manual right now... pulsing the switch makes a nice slow smooth rotation! If you do like electronics projects for the sake of electronics projects, feedback control is an interesting way to go, though. 73, Dan N3OX |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC SHUTS DOWN the 'Boy Broadcaster" from ME | General | |||
FCC SHUTS DOWN the 'Boy Broadcaster" from ME | Policy | |||
Hal Turner - the dumbest man on radio - OFF THE AIR! | Shortwave | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
Tip-of-the-Day: Check your Ham-IV Control Unit | Antenna |