Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"J. D. B." wrote in
: No, please tell us how requiring code tests and more difficult technical testing creates a "more proficient" ham? When code testing was 13/20 WPM and the technical tests were much harder, we still had all the idiots on the bands. Those idiots are not more proficient. You are simply ignoring reality. Do you live in a cave or something? You must be one of them lazy hams. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 21:37:53 GMT, Slow Code wrote:
"J. D. B." wrote in : No, please tell us how requiring code tests and more difficult technical testing creates a "more proficient" ham? When code testing was 13/20 WPM and the technical tests were much harder, we still had all the idiots on the bands. Those idiots are not more proficient. You are simply ignoring reality. Do you live in a cave or something? You must be one of them lazy hams. He's right, though. Anyone who ever heard K2SUC out of Nutley, NJ, would agree. The repeater wars of the 60s and 70s. The 146.715 repeater on Long Island in the early 70s. We've had our share of pre-VEC idiots. But it was never as bad as even some of the things you hear on 75 these days. I rarely plug a mic in. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Email this to your Senators and Congressmen. make the FCC do the right thing. | Equipment | |||
Email this to your Senators and Congressmen. make the FCC do the right thing. | Equipment | |||
Email this to your Senators and Congressmen. make the FCC do the right thing. | Scanner |