Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
mike wrote:
Andrew VK3BFA wrote: tirade 1 deleted Rubbish. Where do you get this 25w figure from, tirade 2 deleted Well, you could do the math...it's easy. Shooting from the hip, firing off the one true, onesizefitsall, solution when you don't know the particulars and are not accountable for the result is... well...it's the "internet way"! mike RANT ON................................................ .................................. I am NOT disputing your theory - its correct as far as it goes, youve left out lots of other factors that, ideally, should be considered in this case, But its irrelevant to the original question. And in real life I would ignore it as being too anal retentive. If the original poster needed to ask how to hook up two transformers, then your quasi mathematical analysis would be totally innapropriate to the job specifications. Did you think of this at all? It is covered in most 1st year engineering course...(RTFM) My method, with the light bulb, might be crude, (it is crude, so?) but it will work. And have proved that it works, more times than I can remember. Linear and switching power supplies. A simple question - using the light bulb method, whats the WORSE that can happen? If the amp is horribly faulty (and lets not even bother about doing insulation tests on the (old) transformer, that would make it even more complicated) then the light bulb will light to full brilliance. Even an engineer could see that theres something wrong, and then fault find it. (After doing the math, of course) The variac method - again, the same simple question - whats the WORSE thing that could go wrong. And I will answer that, not from theory, but from practice. The voltage is slowly ramped up until something fails abruptly and catastrophically. With no current limiting beyond a mains fuse in the variac (You did check its rating, didnt you?) the electros will disintigrate like shotgun cartridges generating lots of additional work. (no harm was done to the person, being a trained engineer they had safety goggles on...didnt they?) (The above assumes its a linear supply - if its SMPS, then the switching devices sacrifice themselves in a vain attempot to save the fuse) I have spent my entire working life in this field - working as a technician fixing up the design problems of engineers. Stuff that any competent technician would know NOT to do, from practical experience. In my working life, I have met approx 5 competent engineers. The rest were theoretical bull**** artists who soon moved into management purely on the strength of having a degree - they were as hopeless at that as they were at engineering, but there they had less chance to do actual damage. Are you a "working" engineer - do you own a soldering iron? - lots of theory, plenty of if/but/maybe/ because/planning, but no real appreciation of what the problem is - firing up an old amplifier. Thats all - its not a design exercise, theres no cahce of a Nobel Prize in this one, the project doesnt need to be managed, no consultants needed to give a "proffessional " opinon, no SPICE models needed - just how to power up an amplifier with minimal damage. RANT OFF............................................... ................................................ woo........ TIRADE ON................................................ .............................................. And I am heartily sick of "armchair experts" making life bloody complicated when someone asks a legitimate question that is best answered without a theoretical textbook analysis - I have seen far too many people at radio clubs made to feel inadequate because some smartarse engineer has given a long winded incomprehensible, irrelevant answer to a simple question. These people leave, and dont bother to come to any more meetings, or ask any more questions. One of the best teachers I ever had was an engineer - a very rare person, a brilliant teacher and a competent engineer. He woked out where the question was coming from, ie the level the student was capable of understanding - he then started from basic principles, with great patience, and took the student forward until they could understand the rocket science behind the question. And if you want to see a good textbook using this method, grab a copy of 'The Art of Engineering" by Horowitz(sp) and Hill. read it - you might learn something from it about communication skill. If you cant help, dont hinder. Andrew VK3BFA. I |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|