Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"radio_rookie" wrote in message
ps.com... doesn't anyone use zero IF now a days. What is the problem of brining the RF signal directly to baseband? Does the IF stage conditions the incoming signal? What are the advantages of the IF stage? Actually, it is fairly common -- it is called direct conversion and it is very popular for simple rigs. It is not without issues. Converting down to audio means that you cannot eliminate the "other sideband". Also, since the RF amp needs to be broadband, you can only get limited gain, so you end up needing a lot of gain in the audio stage. This is achievable, but it is a little tricky to manage oscillations, ringing and the like. In addition, getting narrow bandwidth at audio is also a little dicey, and you can't have it at RF unless you tune the RF ... also tricky. Which is why most receivers these days are still superhets. You can choose an IF that allows you to manage the bandwidth, and even so, multiple conversion is pretty popular. Many commercial rigs are triple conversion, typically with IF's around 60 MHz, 10 MHz and 455 kHz, with a very liberal interpretation of "around" g ... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
When does channel changing DSSS become hybrid DSSS/FHSS? | Policy | |||
Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) | Shortwave | |||
MilAir Monitoring from KeyWest - Lots of Comms! | Scanner | |||
North-Central Florida Mil Logs 9/10/2003 & 9/11/2003 | Scanner | |||
North-Central Florida Mil Logs 9/10/2003 & 9/11/2003 | Shortwave |