Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 22:04:06 +0200, "i3hev, mario held"
wrote: wrote: This is not that hard and there are tricks to do this over very wide ranges. The easiest is create a fixed 90 degree reference and down convert it. that's true but, imho, there's no meaning in removing the (moderate) complexities of the typical superhet receiver just to put (trickier) complexities in quadrature downconverting... apart from part count, controlling the reciprocal phase in two "identical" converters is in itself not an easy task, since just a single degree of dephasing is enough to degrade unwanted sideband rejection. I disagree with trickier vs moderate. For a given level of performance the two are comparable. The only context is one may be familiar vs different as in new. The phase of two converters is pretty easy to maintain, having done it. However, creative part was down converting the LO rather than the more critical small signal paths. Since the LO would only at most require low pass (VFO at 70-124mhz with fixed IQ generation at 70mhz would give a simple dc-54mhz LO) to prevent the 70mhz and higher components. If passive DBMs are used phase shifts from gain and added LCs can be avoided. Also it's possible to put inline measurement of the resulting LOs and feed back any phase error (found unneeded) for correction. To build a superhet (ignore selectivity and overload performance for the moment) to cover dc-54mhz you need upconversion and then down conversion to IF and lots of filters along the way with switching. Then you have the problem of various LOs and carrier osc (SSB/CW) getting back into previous stages causing undesired tones. The more conversions the greater the problem and the better shielding must be to avoid it. Having built both each has challenges and to do it as a high performing reciever (or TX) requires a very similar effort even if the areas where the effort need be applied differ. The one big difference is that the image reject system is less hardware between antenna and the baseband and that hardware is more frequency agile. The best available analog answer is the KK7B MiniR2 (or R2-PRO), base design uses SBL-1 mixers good from 1-500mhz making generation of an 90degree LO the only real work. As you go up in frequency a quadrature splitter will have both phase and level bandwidth that increases making a tuneable VHF or UHF IF practical. (FYI: accepable (under 1degree and under 1db level variation) bandwidth at 14mhz is 1mhz.) Of course the image reject detector system could exist at any fixed frequency such as 66 mhz with a fixed LO. Then the upconverter only needs a conventional LO of 66 to 120mhz still yeilds an RX that tunes from DC to 54mhz and has few if any adjustments. This would yeild a Single conversion RX with a VHF IF that is remarkably simple and needs few filters. If you take that to the next step using DSP at baseband where it's cheap (using PS and soundcard) you have a very straightforward high performing multimode radio. This is the current SDR approach. When you consider a mainboard with ram, sound and other needed bits running at 1+ ghz is dirt cheap (found free sometimes) and small this is achieveable. Especially considering the software is already out there. Also unused CPU cycles could also do the "glass front pannel" and manage things like tuning the DDS or PLL. ... Those two things are not easy or cheap.. yet. But we are getting there. I'm sure we will get there soon enough, and it may well be that just a few years will suffice; but, as for now... they are not easy or cheap! ![]() Actually it's progressing faster than you'd notice. The number of Ham radios with IF DSP as the detection is considerable. Most of the upper models of Tentec, Yaesu, Kenwood and others are already doing it. Also the vendors of the DSP processors do have boards for proto work to venture into this realm. With more people doing it and plenty of alreay published work it may be more assembly of components (be they hardware or software) than construction. While this wanders far from the IF question posted it's an example fo how you can have IFs from baseband through UHF or higher. Allison |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
When does channel changing DSSS become hybrid DSSS/FHSS? | Policy | |||
Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) | Shortwave | |||
MilAir Monitoring from KeyWest - Lots of Comms! | Scanner | |||
North-Central Florida Mil Logs 9/10/2003 & 9/11/2003 | Scanner | |||
North-Central Florida Mil Logs 9/10/2003 & 9/11/2003 | Shortwave |