Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:56:11 +0300, Paul Keinanen wrote:
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:05:21 +0300, Ceriel Nosforit wrote: Hey all, I read about people using their sound card to catch transmissions from dedicated senders such as SAQ by just hooking a roll of wire to the mic-in and apparently finding some success in this. This got my wondering, what aside from laws and fines is stopping me from hooking my 80W stereo amp up to some sort of antenna for global transmission fun? Somebody must have thought of this before... At least previously, the frequency tables started at 9 kHz, so anything below that would not cause any interference to any other service. However, the problem with VLF is that any practical antenna is going to be very short compared to wavelength and since the radiation resistance is proportional to the square of frequency for antennas well below 1/4 wavelength, most of the power injected into an antenna is going to be dissipated in resistive losses. At the LF aeronautical beacon band with 90 m antennas, the antenna efficiency based on measurements flown around these beacons seems to be about 1 %. In Europe, the maximum _radiated_ power limit on the 135 kHz amateur radio band is 1 W, but generating that kind of radiated power with reasonable sized antennas (30 m) would require at least 1 kW of transmitter power, indicating that the practical antenna efficiency is about 0.1 %. At 13 kHz, the efficiency would be about 0.001 %. The near field distance for a simple antenna extends to about 1/6 wavelength, so at VLF, the practical communication range for amateur communication systems would be well within the near field. Since you are apparently from Finland and since the Finnish telecommunication law only grants the jurisdiction to the telecommunication authorities for "freely propagating" electromagnetic radiation, my interpretation of the law is that it does not cover any near field i.e. magnetic or electrostatic communication systems, in which the near field communication systems work. Of course, if you are able to generate huge magnetic or electric fields that cause interference to other systems, this may cause problems to you. But otherwise, go ahead with your experiments, but unfortunately the laws of physics will hit you sooner or later :-). Paul OH3LWR Woha. A lot of info to assimilate. Thank you. A few quick questions; the efficiency at higher frequencies does only increse logarithmically, correct? Around where is the 'knee' where increment of frequency no longer provideas a significant increase in efficiency? - Ballpark numbers and guesstimates are perfectly OK for me, since I'm only curious of the general idea. Finally, what exactly do you mean by 'near field'? Is it an arbitrary line in the sand that separates near fields from normal fields, or a completely different physical phenomena? -- Nos |