LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7   Report Post  
Old October 25th 06, 04:59 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 26
Default Ferrite antenna com system

1. Ferrite and powdered iron are entirely different materials, with
different physical and magnetic characteristics. Powdered iron isn't a
good choice for this application.


Powdered iron should work better because of the higher permeability even
under heavy load in comparision to ferrite. I think so in theory - not
tested.

2. You're not likely to drive either one into a nonlinear region when
they're in the form of a rod because of the large air gap in the
magnetic path.


Can you explain this more detailed Ron? What will happen with the air gap?
The losses in the air gap radiates and that is the antenna function?

- Henry


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Loop Antennas / minijack works-clips don't / impedence?? [email protected] Shortwave 14 August 23rd 06 04:07 AM
WHY - The simple Random Wire Antenna is better than the Dipole Antenna for the Shortwave Listener (SWL) RHF Shortwave 15 September 13th 05 08:28 AM
OLD motorola trunking information jack smith Scanner 1 December 12th 03 09:48 AM
Question for better antenna mavens than I Tony Meloche Shortwave 7 October 28th 03 09:16 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017