Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 18:36:48 +0200, "Henry Kiefer"
wrote: - LNA design for such a low frequency? The band noise is the dominant (compared to "white" amplifier) noise when listening to the band with your transmitter switched off, the receiver noise performance should be adequate. How much band noise should I expect? When listening at the signal e.g. through an SSB receiver, it is quite easy to know the difference. The equipment noise is more or less constant "hiss", while the band noise is mainly through numerous distant lightnings. Some field strength measurements made in England at 73 kHz during the summer, using a calibrated meter indicated 25 uV/m in 200 Hz bandwidth, which would produce about 120 dB more power from a full sized (2 km) dipole than a single matched resistor at the receiver input. Thus, even if the actual antenna efficiency was -100 dB and the LNA noise figure as bad as 10 dB, the band noise would still be stronger than the amplifier noise. While an antenna with -100 dB gain would be usable for receiving, such antenna would be useless for transmitting. Paul OH3LWR |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Loop Antennas / minijack works-clips don't / impedence?? | Shortwave | |||
WHY - The simple Random Wire Antenna is better than the Dipole Antenna for the Shortwave Listener (SWL) | Shortwave | |||
OLD motorola trunking information | Scanner | |||
Question for better antenna mavens than I | Shortwave |