Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the information; someone else pointed me yesterday to the idea that you'd generally match the input for optimum noise performance rather than optimum power transfer. The data sheet claims that the optimum noise figure is 0.8dB, but the part itself is marketed as "typical 1.8dB NF" -- which they obtained from their own eval board that, as far as I can tell, was matched pretty close to optimum power transfer. In any case, at present mine is also matched at the input for optimum power transfer, and I'll measure its noise figure and see whether or not I'm around 1.8dB or better... if so I don't think I'm going to worry about it too much. Output matching will transfer the greatest power to the load. Yeah, but it's not practical, is it? I'm looking back at (approximately) a current source, and my load is dictated as (approximately) 50 ohms, so the load itself is what's driving the power transferred, no? Assuming S12 is very low It is, 0.01 everywhere. And you need to pay attention to amplifier stability: is it unconditionally stable, or must you keep the load within some bounds to keep it stable? I haven't calculated its k factor; I'll do that soon -- thanks for the link. ---Joel |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: CheepEIMAC NOS 3-400Z 8163 RF OUTPUT AMPLIFIER TUBEDrake:-) | Boatanchors | |||
FA: EIMAC NOS 3-400Z 8163 RF OUTPUT AMPLIFIER TUBECHEEP! | Equipment | |||
FA: EIMAC NOS 3-400Z 8163 RF OUTPUT AMPLIFIER TUBECHEEP! | CB | |||
FA: TWO(2) GE 6LF6 RF OUTPUT AMPLIFIER TUBES> A Good Deal ! | Equipment | |||
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna |