Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Joel Kolstad wrote: Hi Tom, Thanks for the information; someone else pointed me yesterday to the idea that you'd generally match the input for optimum noise performance rather than optimum power transfer. The data sheet claims that the optimum noise figure is 0.8dB, but the part itself is marketed as "typical 1.8dB NF" -- which they obtained from their own eval board that, as far as I can tell, was matched pretty close to optimum power transfer. In any case, at present mine is also matched at the input for optimum power transfer, and I'll measure its noise figure and see whether or not I'm around 1.8dB or better... if so I don't think I'm going to worry about it too much. Output matching will transfer the greatest power to the load. Yeah, but it's not practical, is it? I'm looking back at (approximately) a current source, and my load is dictated as (approximately) 50 ohms, so the load itself is what's driving the power transferred, no? Well, no... Clearly it's not exactly a current source. Perhaps it's 1000 ohms, or 10000 ohms, (plus some reactance, of course) which is high but not a pure current source. Then a network that matches 1000 ohms, or 10000 ohms, to 50 ohms (and cancels the reactance), will give you the most power output. That is a linear, small-signal model, but that should be a pretty good approximation for any application where you need a low-noise preamp. You do need to consider losses in whatever matching network you use; and many matching networks will be highly resonant to transform between impedances that are in a large ratio. Realize that the match at the operating frequency may give you a load at some other frequency which causes instability... If the source (the output impedance) was really a current source, you could get near-infinite power gain (again, assuming that S12 is zero) by transforming the load to as high an impedance as possible. Consider the small-signal low-frequency model of a bipolar transistor where the output is a current source shunted by a resistance. Assume that (internal effective) resistance is infinite. Now the current from the current source all flows into the load. Since power is i^2*R, increasing R increases the power without bound. A matching network just transforms your practical load (e.g. 50 ohms) to the desired load R. What's practical depends on how wide a bandwidth you want, and how good you are at designing and building impedance matching networks. (I can personally come up with lots of IMpractical networks! ;-) Cheers, Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: CheepEIMAC NOS 3-400Z 8163 RF OUTPUT AMPLIFIER TUBEDrake:-) | Boatanchors | |||
FA: EIMAC NOS 3-400Z 8163 RF OUTPUT AMPLIFIER TUBECHEEP! | Equipment | |||
FA: EIMAC NOS 3-400Z 8163 RF OUTPUT AMPLIFIER TUBECHEEP! | CB | |||
FA: TWO(2) GE 6LF6 RF OUTPUT AMPLIFIER TUBES> A Good Deal ! | Equipment | |||
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna |