Roger that! I have a Yaesu FT-857 in my truck so I have HF through 440
and antennas for all bands. I'd be screaming my lungs out on 40M or 20M
or whatever band I could raise somebody on!

Scott
N0EDV

Lois wrote:

we never travel in that type of area but
when we do travel by car, got plenty of food,
several boxes cereal for me not the kids !,
cooler with drinks and h2o and several
road flares (makes fires fast) and my 2m/440 mobile kenwood
and ht.

also have old cb from 1975 and it works.


Scott wrote:

I agree...here in the Northern U.S. where we (usually) get plenty of
snow and ice, we were taught to stay with the vehicle (and it's always a
good idea to have an emergency supply of food and water in the car,
especially in the winter months). In the case of an air search and
rescue, it's far easier to spot a car on the ground (which is usually
very near to a road) rather than spot a person in the woods...

Scott wrote in
:

I agree...here in the Northern U.S. where we (usually) get plenty of
snow and ice, we were taught to stay with the vehicle (and it's always
a good idea to have an emergency supply of food and water in the car,
especially in the winter months). In the case of an air search and
rescue, it's far easier to spot a car on the ground (which is usually
very near to a road) rather than spot a person in the woods...

Yep...if you're going to do anything, get out and make sure the car is
not covered by snow. And if you have enough blankets/sleeping bags, then
turn off the car's electricity unless you hear a chopper in the dark.
Then flash the lights.

But people do the craziest things. I've heard of people abandoning a
boat just because it lost power, only to drown. The Coast Guard
recovered the boat intact.

And one time in Nova Scotia, we went searching for a couple that had gone
missing after hiking into the woods opposite the airport. We found them
OK, but they were lost, they said, despite the fact that they were under
the approach to the main runway and at least 4 large jets an hour flew
over them!




--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667

wonder if he used the cell phone(s) for a few min
at the top of every hour as a beacon to help recsue
try to loacte him by special gear ?



BakersT wrote:

In article ,
notbob wrote:

[snip]
This worries me because it highlights the shortcomings of all this new
high tech gimcrackery. As I understand it, even satellite cellphones
require a service provider with a nearby uplink antenna. So, this
brings up my question, as a non ham:

How long do you think it would have taken James, or anyone in that
situation, to make contact with outside help and get him and his
family out of there if he'd had something like a basic QRP tranceiver
and antenna and knew how to use it?

Any thoughts you may have on this issue would be appreciated.

Well, the _right_ high tech gimcrackery (a "personnel locator beacon",
e.g. http://www.landfallnavigation.com/spwff1.html) would almost
certainly have been effective. And I'm sorry for his family's loss, and
can appreciate that Mr. Kim must have felt that taking action was
necessary to save his wife and children, but had he _stayed_put_ he'd be
alive today.

keep in mind, he, like most of us, was just a middle class guy who had
essentially no experience in rugged, snowy terrain. He lived in SF, in the
city. His family was going up to visit relatives. How often do normal
middle class folks carry a big-ass survival kit that would help them survive
for weeks in the snowy wilderness, even when they're driving through the
snowy wilderness between two major metropolitan areas?

It just lets us know what everybody who lives in Alaska, or North Dakota, or
Montana, already knows -- far away is closer than you think.

notbob wrote in
:

No doubt many are saddened by the senseless loss of James Kim, the
family man that perished in the mountains of Western Oregon early this
week. I think what makes it all the more tragic is that here was a
person who was on the cutting edge of all the latest and greatest high
tech computer and communications technology. Blackberries, photo
cellphones, wifi PDA's and laptops, etc. I'm stunned a person in such
a high tech vector could become so completely isolated in such a short
distance from the mainstream.

This worries me because it highlights the shortcomings of all this new
high tech gimcrackery. As I understand it, even satellite cellphones
require a service provider with a nearby uplink antenna. So, this
brings up my question, as a non ham:

How long do you think it would have taken James, or anyone in that
situation, to make contact with outside help and get him and his
family out of there if he'd had something like a basic QRP tranceiver
and antenna and knew how to use it?

Actually, in those mountains, a 2 meter hand-held would probably have
given him someone to talk to.



--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667

On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:33:59 -0600, notbob wrote:

No doubt many are saddened by the senseless loss of James Kim, the
family man that perished in the mountains of Western Oregon early this
week. I think what makes it all the more tragic is that here was a
person who was on the cutting edge of all the latest and greatest high
tech computer and communications technology. Blackberries, photo
cellphones, wifi PDA's and laptops, etc. I'm stunned a person in such
a high tech vector could become so completely isolated in such a short
distance from the mainstream.

This worries me because it highlights the shortcomings of all this new
high tech gimcrackery. As I understand it, even satellite cellphones
require a service provider with a nearby uplink antenna. So, this
brings up my question, as a non ham:

How long do you think it would have taken James, or anyone in that
situation, to make contact with outside help and get him and his
family out of there if he'd had something like a basic QRP tranceiver
and antenna and knew how to use it?

Any thoughts you may have on this issue would be appreciated.

nb

Great idea setting the tires on fire,but they should of started a huge forest
fire in the area. going to prison for starting a forest fire is way better than
dead!

maxfoo wrote:
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:33:59 -0600, notbob wrote:


No doubt many are saddened by the senseless loss of James Kim, the
family man that perished in the mountains of Western Oregon early this
week. I think what makes it all the more tragic is that here was a
person who was on the cutting edge of all the latest and greatest high
tech computer and communications technology. Blackberries, photo
cellphones, wifi PDA's and laptops, etc. I'm stunned a person in such
a high tech vector could become so completely isolated in such a short
distance from the mainstream.

This worries me because it highlights the shortcomings of all this new
high tech gimcrackery. As I understand it, even satellite cellphones
require a service provider with a nearby uplink antenna. So, this
brings up my question, as a non ham:

How long do you think it would have taken James, or anyone in that
situation, to make contact with outside help and get him and his
family out of there if he'd had something like a basic QRP tranceiver
and antenna and knew how to use it?

Any thoughts you may have on this issue would be appreciated.

nb


Great idea setting the tires on fire,but they should of started a huge forest
fire in the area. going to prison for starting a forest fire is way better than
dead!


Starting a forest fire in the middle of the freak'in winter?
Highly unlikely.