Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
" wrote in
ups.com: John Smith wrote: Dee: England feared granting us independence and the right to govern ourselves, frankly, they were correct; we have been a problem ever since! Warmest regards, JS I'm of the opinion that the ARRL feared to give US radio amateurs their independence from morse code testing. :-) LA Secretly, the ARRL would like to see the code requirement go away, but they can't display that outwardly because it will make them look like they are against having good skilled hams. Rest assured, when the code requirement is eliminated, the ARRL (Anti-Radio-Relay-League) with try to come up with a way to capitalize on the dumbing down of the service so they can get more money in the corporate bank account. SC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
another place the fruit can't post | Policy | |||
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio? | Antenna | |||
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? | Policy | |||
Doing Battle? Can't Resist Posting? | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | General |