Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Dec 15, 7:57 am, (Joseph H Allen) wrote: What do you do if the input impedance of an LNA does not equal the source impedance which gives the lowest noise? The source might be an antenna, transmission line or filter which will not work properly if it does not see the correct impedance. What exactly do you mean by "will not work properly"? There are a lot of effects possible; reflections on a transmission line may cause "ghosts" in an analog video image, or an improperly terminated filter may not give the needed frequency response. But there are ways around those problems: put the LNA at the antenna, or design the filter to work into the load impedance it will actually "see." Or maybe the lowest possible noise is not a requirement, and you can optimize system performance with a tradeoff between noise and some other parameter. Lucky indeed is the designer who is able to optimize all parameters at the same time. A big part of design is often selecting the tradeoffs so the overall system goals can be met with enough margin to let the system operate reliably. Also, you may be surprised to find out just how little gain is sacrificed by using an optimal noise match instead of an optimal power match, or how little a filter's performance is altered by tuning for minimum noise figure. Finally, can you think of a way to alter the amplifier's input impedance in a way that does not degrade noise, so that you come closer to an impedance match while maintaining a match for optimal noise? Cheers, Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tandem Match | Homebrew | |||
please need help with delta loop antenna better matching system than gamma match | Antenna | |||
Clemens match modelling | Antenna | |||
Gamma match question 6-meter yagi | Antenna | |||
Gamma match: Inherently inferior to balanced match systems? | Antenna |