Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Folks,
I just found this group. Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but here goes: I am presently a student studying for my MSc in Applied Physics. Next semester I have a course in Electronics which is going to require me to do a project. Now I have worked with radio control vehicles before (ROV's), but this time, I wanted to build a vehicle and have it be semi autonomous, ie with a microcontroller. Along with that, I will need a fairly long range (say, 1 mile) video transmitter to put "eyes" on the vehicle. I have worked with the short range, commercially available wireless video cameras that use the pinhole camera and have a range of about 300 feet unobstructed. I was wondering if anyone on this forum knows of a kit that I could purchase to build one myself (I may be mistaken, but an assembled unit probably costs a lot more). If this is not the right forum, pls let me know that too. Links, ideas, etc are welcomed. TIA, Joe KB1KVI (kilo bravo1 kilo victor India) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe wrote:
Hi Folks, I just found this group. Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but here goes: I am presently a student studying for my MSc in Applied Physics. Next semester I have a course in Electronics which is going to require me to do a project. Now I have worked with radio control vehicles before (ROV's), but this time, I wanted to build a vehicle and have it be semi autonomous, ie with a microcontroller. Along with that, I will need a fairly long range (say, 1 mile) video transmitter to put "eyes" on the vehicle. I have worked with the short range, commercially available wireless video cameras that use the pinhole camera and have a range of about 300 feet unobstructed. I was wondering if anyone on this forum knows of a kit that I could purchase to build one myself (I may be mistaken, but an assembled unit probably costs a lot more). If this is not the right forum, pls let me know that too. Links, ideas, etc are welcomed. TIA, Joe KB1KVI (kilo bravo1 kilo victor India) Joe, Before suggesting anything it would be helpful to know a little bit more about the requirements. Are you considering analog or digital TV transmission? What frame rate is required? How many horizontal lines? B/W or color? Are you planning on using amateur radio or unlicensed frequency bands? How long are the transmissions? Any size/weight constraints? There are many tradeoffs to be considered. For example if you are sending digital pictures, the frame rate, vertical and horizontal resolution, and color depth will dictate the data rate in bits/second. Based on a given data rate there will now be tradeoffs in terms of frequency band, power, bandwidth, SNR, antenna size, power supply requirements etc. We also need to know if you are considering building something at the component level or whether you are trying to use off-the-shelf modules. Sounds like a fun project - Roger |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe,
Given that you plan to transmit analog television transmission you will want to operate on the ham bands. The unlicensed stuff will not have the 1 mile range given the bandwidth and SNR requirements. I suggest you get a recent copy of the ARRL Handbook. Chapter 9 has a section on Amateur Television (ATV) and Radio Control. There is an example of ATV mounted on a model Humvee. There is a lot of good info on the ARRL site at http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/atv.html Google is your friend - a search on "amateur television" gave lots of sites with interesting equipment that can be purchased or built. There are groups and forums where you will get lots of practical tips. Roger |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Joe" wrote in message
ps.com... you asked: Analog TV, actually, I would like to use my own TV, like maybe cable channel 59 (I know we have some video bandwidth around to plug into the monitor. Definitely color TV and I thought that , given the range requirement of about a mile, I would need to use the amateur band. If not, that's fine too. Length of transmissions, now I You can get a mile unobstructed with WiFi, and it does tend to be a little less expensive than ATV. However, to get that sort of range does rely on using a channel within the amateur spectrum, and more significantly, requires a lot of antenna gain, unless you move to a lot of power which again gets expensive. Depending on your vehicle, that sort of antenna gain might not be practical. Relatively small WiFi antennas can be astonishingly directional. You might also consider 900 MHz. This allows more reasonable antennas than 440 and equipment is still somewhat inexpensive, although not as widely available as WiFi. It is a little easier to get the mile on 900 MHz than 2.4 GHz. (been there, ran the tests). On 440 you are likely to encounter QRM (I'm assuming from the 1 call you are in the upper right there where there's a bunch of people) and antennas are going to be larger, something of a problem for your vehicle. ATV receivers for 900 MHz are fairly inexpensive. I assume you are going to rely on the vehicle for camera positioning, or you are going to build it yourself. If you want to buy pan/tilt/zoom capability, then digital gets dramatically cheaper. ... |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() xpyttl wrote: "Joe" wrote in message ps.com... you asked: Analog TV, actually, I would like to use my own TV, like maybe cable channel 59 (I know we have some video bandwidth around to plug into the monitor. Definitely color TV and I thought that , given the range requirement of about a mile, I would need to use the amateur band. If not, that's fine too. Length of transmissions, now I You can get a mile unobstructed with WiFi, and it does tend to be a little less expensive than ATV. However, to get that sort of range does rely on using a channel within the amateur spectrum, and more significantly, requires a lot of antenna gain, unless you move to a lot of power which again gets expensive. Depending on your vehicle, that sort of antenna gain might not be practical. Relatively small WiFi antennas can be astonishingly directional. You might also consider 900 MHz. This allows more reasonable antennas than 440 and equipment is still somewhat inexpensive, although not as widely available as WiFi. It is a little easier to get the mile on 900 MHz than 2.4 GHz. (been there, ran the tests). On 440 you are likely to encounter QRM (I'm assuming from the 1 call you are in the upper right there where there's a bunch of people) and antennas are going to be larger, something of a problem for your vehicle. ATV receivers for 900 MHz are fairly inexpensive. I assume you are going to rely on the vehicle for camera positioning, or you are going to build it yourself. If you want to buy pan/tilt/zoom capability, then digital gets dramatically cheaper. .. Thank you for the info. I will look into 900MHz and WiFi. I was only planning on panning, no tilt, and no zoom. Joe |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current through coils | Antenna | |||
1st Responder Wireless Acquires TAC 9 Paging | Scanner | |||
FS: USA Video Surveillance & Detection Directory - 2004 Edition | Scanner | |||
FCC'S Wireless Bureau announces reorganization | Policy | |||
Indoor Wireless Cable TV Transmission | Antenna |