Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Spike wrote:
know code wrote: Brian Reay wrote: "G.A.Evans G4SDW" wrote in message ... I proposed a joint effort through Usenet, and outlined how some of these biscuits might be evolved. You very quickly turned to uttering personal slights and have continued relentlessly down your chosen path. Where are these "personal slights"? I offered to help publicise your idea. I've prepared some space to do so or, if you prefer, I will publicise a link to a website you can set up yourself. So come on, "get baking those biscuits" or I suspect some will conclude your idea was the hardware equivalent of "vapourware". After the way you have treated Gareth over the past few years, do you really think he is going to accept your charity now? You're in cloud cuckoo cuckoo land if you think he will! Gareth's reply to Brian's offer made it clear that he expected far more than assistance with site hosting, and threw in a personal attack for good measure, so I suspect your comment is somewhat ill-informed. Here is the relevant part of Gareth's posting: I doubt his sincerity, based on his previous emotional history expressed in this NG, and his contemporaneous linking up with Mrs.Nugatory in an abusive sub-thread. What you have quoted below is most certainly _NOT_ a support for the proposal. There is no suggestion of what the biscuits might be; no suggestion of what the standard interfaces between biscuits might be; no suggestion of what the mechanical arrangements migth be; no proposals of component sets. Watching these Brits make asses of themselves makes me proud to be an American! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Putting the "Real" back into _REAL_ Ham Radio | Homebrew | |||
Putting the "Real" back into _REAL_ Ham Radio | Policy | |||
Putting up an Imax | CB | |||
Putting up an Imax | Policy | |||
Putting ARRL back "mainstream" with hometown hams | Policy |