Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
K7ITM wrote:
Adding to Ian's good words, the larger resistors (1W, 2W and sometimes more) are commonly metal-oxide. They also work well, and have the same few-turn spiral structure that the metal film ones do. I should have made it clearer that metal-oxide resistors exist, and are generally similar to metal-film in their construction and low inductance. However, we can only say "generally". If the very lowest inductance is important, you need to remove the coating and check for yourself. Several years ago I measured a little dummy load I made from four 200 ohm 2W metal-oxide parts in parallel. The construction was "tight" so that the leads didn't contribute more inductance than the resistors themselves. I don't have the numbers with me at the moment, but I recall a return loss measurement equivalent to about 1.1 or 1.15:1 at 150MHz, and around 1.5:1 at 450MHz. The metal-oxide resistors have another interesting characteristic. They can dissipate enough power to glow red and do a very respectable job maintaining their resistance value--though expect some change if you let them get that hot. [Moved] It's very unlikely that a carbon composition resistor, or a carbon film, or even a normal metal film, will be able to hold its value as well if it gets that hot. Metal film resistors do seem to behave well in similar tests. Like Tom (and Tim in another message) I have deliberately overloaded samples by a factor of 10 to see what would happen. From glowing bright red, the resistance returned to a few percent of the original value. In parallel tests, modern carbon film resistors simply burned up - which is exactly what you would expect carbon to do. I didn't waste time on carbon comp, as any OT already knows they cannot tolerate even moderate overloads without oozing organic binder materials, accompanied by smoke, an awful smell and a large, permanent increase in resistance. The other low-inductance power resistors that haven't been mentioned are the flat-film types, designed to be bolted down to a heatsink. There's a nice constructional example of a large RF power attenuator using these devices at: http://granta.digital-crocus.com/Attenuator.php3 What surprises me is that carbon comp resistors are still available as specialist items because of their claimed performance in pulsed applications. With so many alternatives available, that have almost equally low inductance and vastly superior power handling, it would be interesting to learn what the specific advantages of carbon comp might be? That's a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it's nice to know they will be pretty stable, but if you mount one on a circuit board, you need to make sure that it won't dissipate too much power, because it's quite capable of burning a hole in the board. These modern power resistors are also much smaller than traditional types... but this too can be double-edged. I sell a kit that includes a number of 1W, 2W and 3W metal film resistors, and occasionally receive e-mails saying: "There are several small resistors left over - and where are all the power resistors?" -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Carbon Comp. 1w & 2w Resistors | Boatanchors | |||
WTB: carbon comp resistors 1/2watt | Boatanchors | |||
WTB: carbon comp resistors 1/2watt | Swap | |||
WTB: carbon comp resistors 1/2watt | Boatanchors | |||
WTB: 100K 2 watt carbon resistors NOS | Equipment |