Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim Shoppa wrote:
When I've purposefully burnt low-ohm metal oxides (it's surprisingly hard - the resistor literally has to glow red hot for it to happen!) it is clear that while there is a spiral winding, that it's quite wide and only a turn or two for the resistors in the low ohm range and that the turns are extremely wide and fat. They could very well be lower inductance than the original carbon comps. In fact the original choke fire that took out the original parasitic suppressors probably resulted from parasitic oscillation in the finals (I always assumed so - drawing a couple hundred mA with no input, and a bright blue glow from the final compartment, I always thought must be some sort of parasitic!) Parasitic oscillations are the subject of perpetual Holy Wars among certain amplifier builders... but both sides do agree about carbon composition resistors. The resistors used in parasitic suppressors have to operate in a very hot environment, and they are also subject to heating by the RF current passing through them (especially on the higher HF bands). With carbon composition, the resistance is virtually certain to increase over time. This makes the parasitic suppressors less effective than they were when the amplifier was new, so there is some small risk that parasitic oscillations may reappear in older amplifiers. If this happens, both sides agree that the original carbon comp resistors should always be replaced by metal film or metal oxide resistors - or preferably by a small bundle connected in parallel to reduce the inductance. (However, if the amplifier is still stable, it's usually better to leave well-enough alone until something happens, or until the next major overhaul.) The same applies to the much higher-value resistors that are connected in parallel with the electrolytic capacitors in the power supply. These resistors are intended to equalize the voltages across the capacitors, but many old amplifiers used under-sized carbon composition resistors. Once again, these are virtually certain to have increased in value by an unpredictable amount, and instead of equalizing the voltages, some of them may now be having the opposite effect! Replacement with 3W metal film or metal oxide resistors is strongly advised (probably of a lower value than original, for improved voltage equalization). Once the carbon composition resistors have been replaced by metal film or metal oxide, the problems of resistance change will be gone for good. -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Carbon Comp. 1w & 2w Resistors | Boatanchors | |||
WTB: carbon comp resistors 1/2watt | Boatanchors | |||
WTB: carbon comp resistors 1/2watt | Swap | |||
WTB: carbon comp resistors 1/2watt | Boatanchors | |||
WTB: 100K 2 watt carbon resistors NOS | Equipment |