Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael,
"msg" wrote in message news:er2dnY-QZL0urJHVnZ2dnUVZ_sKqnZ2d@cpinternet... The recent thread discussing W0IYH's new book got me researching Mathcad Has anyone seen such an analysis? I haven't, but I can tell you that version 12 was still just an "enter the product code and it works anywhere" whereas by version 2001 it required Internet activation (presumably with a finite number of activations -- not good if you upgrade computers regularly and and to keep it for awhile). (The versions went 12, 2000, 2001, 2001i, 13, and now 14, AFAIK.) The biggest improvement for me between version 12 and 2001 was that they let you have scales on both the left- and right-hand sides of a graph. There were of course other new features and what-not, that's just the only one I remember caring that much about! The change to an XML file structure (it's ASCII-readable) allows for easy searching of MathCAD files and -- ostensibly -- being able to parse, convert, and create your own MathCAD worksheets programmatically, at least if they actually documented the structure ("schema") reasonably well. (Some companies change to XML just to satisfy some big corporate "checklist" of features required of software and don't publish -- or incompletely publish, as with Microsoft Office -- their schemas.) ---Joel |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hallicrafters S-9 vs SX-9 differences? | Boatanchors | |||
Differences Between Two of the Same Radio | Shortwave | |||
Differences Between Two of the Same Radio | Shortwave | |||
AX.25 version differences | Digital | |||
AX.25 version differences | Digital |