Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old July 7th 08, 06:08 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 250
Default Wideband receiver architectures

The one I had used triple conversion superhet. Mircoprocessor
controlled.
The first IF was like 336Mhz to 10.7Mhz to 455Khz. There was no front
end. just direct conversion to the IF. So all the micro had to do was
control the oscillator from 336Mhz to 900Mhz using up conversion on
the low bands and down conversion on the higher bands. Cell phone band
was locked out. Guess what you can pick cell phone band on the image
frequency back in the day.

========
Are analog cellphones still used in the USA ?
I thought by now it is all digital sigs which can not be received with a
'normal' receiver , so what's the reason to 'lock out' the cellphone
frequencies ?

Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH
  #12   Report Post  
Old July 7th 08, 06:53 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2007
Posts: 133
Default Wideband receiver architectures

wrote in message
...
Guess what you can pick cell phone band on the image
frequency back in the day.


Given how much time was spent discussing the need for image rejection and the
sometimes-elaborate techniques for achieving it, I suspect a lot of my college
professors would be incredulous to learn that many receivers do just fine
without it.

I've noticed that many Yaesu radios lock out the images of the old AMPS band,
which sucks because the image is where there are also 100%-legal-to-receive
paging bands. Yaesu lost a sale to Icom over this.

Hopefully the stupid law will be dropped one of these days -- it's not like
any large percentage of all cell phone conversations are carried out on an
AMPS anymore, and most of the cell phone carriers are quietly shutting down
their old AMPS equipment altogether.

---Joel



  #13   Report Post  
Old July 8th 08, 09:41 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 117
Default Wideband receiver architectures

On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 06:08:21 +0100, Highland Ham wrote:

The one I had used triple conversion superhet. Mircoprocessor
controlled.
The first IF was like 336Mhz to 10.7Mhz to 455Khz. There was no front
end. just direct conversion to the IF. So all the micro had to do was
control the oscillator from 336Mhz to 900Mhz using up conversion on
the low bands and down conversion on the higher bands. Cell phone band
was locked out. Guess what you can pick cell phone band on the image
frequency back in the day.

========
Are analog cellphones still used in the USA ?
I thought by now it is all digital sigs which can not be received with a
'normal' receiver , so what's the reason to 'lock out' the cellphone
frequencies ?

Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH


The same government logic that made TV broadcast standards
backwards-compatible for over 50 years.

__
Gregg
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FA: Yaesu VR-500 Wideband receiver Jerry Franks Equipment 0 July 24th 07 11:07 PM
FS: Yaesu VR-500 wideband receiver Jerry Franks Swap 1 July 23rd 07 06:32 PM
best pc wideband receiver? jwb Shortwave 6 August 23rd 05 02:17 PM
Wideband receiver with IF output Stefan Mangard Equipment 6 October 15th 03 02:39 PM
Wideband receiver with IF output Stefan Mangard Equipment 0 October 14th 03 09:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017