Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 26, 3:32*am, Paul Keinanen wrote:
Excuse my ignorance, but why on earth do you do some crude analog filtering and then continue with digital filtering, in which you have much more alternatives ? To undersample the signal it must be bandwidth limited which means some type of analog filtering. As long as filtering is necessary, it might as well be a narrow as the widest signal of interest and as sharp as possible so long as it's convenient and doesn't distort the signal too much. why would anyone use the receiver CW filters Probably a bit narrower than what I had in mind … I'm currently looking at 500 KHz wide SAW filters. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Degen DE1103 quality variation | Shortwave | |||
variation of number station | Shortwave | |||
interesting variation in the DA5 | Shortwave | |||
OT Unique variation on regime change | Shortwave | |||
Variation in modeling predictions between software | Antenna |