Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob wrote:
I've designed /commercial/ solid-state receivers, and there's just *no* *way* to get results as good as can still be obtained from valves in crucial parts of them! The rest of the transceiver industry (other than you) apparently thinks tube embedded HF transceivers are quite obsolete for a wide variety of reasons. Else they would be manufacturing and selling them. Even ham magazines print mostly solid state articles using modern solid state parts, which is right since hams should learn to use modern technology. When they do print a tube article it's usually described as nostalgia. I'm not prejudiced at all - You used the term "Rice Box" to describe your dislike of a whole range of several hundred ham tranceivers. Different manufacturers. Different models. Pure prejudice. Logically you should judge equipment on its individual merits, not by the race of the people who made it. I'll continue with what I consider to be the real essence of our hobby, and build the gear myself! Building is but *one* facet of the hobby. Professional engineer hams capable of designing and building transceivers are a but very very tiny part of the hobby... Not at all - they [Asians] /still/ can't make a good mobile phone! 8-) As I said prejudiced... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|