![]() |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
Telstar Electronics wrote:
WA7PRC, you are absolutely correct that the design is based on the Analog Devices SSM2166 chip. I'm curious about your soldering comment. Why do you feel the soldering is poor? We have not had a single failure due to poor soldering. We have approximately 400 units in the field at this time. The field failure is around 0.2% during the one year period that these units have been on the market. ======= That would mean that only 1 of the 400 units had failed in the field. Is that correct ? Frank KN6WH |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
Telstar Electronics wrote:
Bryan wrote: cmdr buzz corey wrote: On Nov 14, 5:13 am, Telstar Electronics wrote: The VoiceMax speech processor is not for everyone... It's only for radio operators that want maximum range from their rig. Along with maximum splatter. In looking closely at his photos, it appears his circuit is based on the Analog Devices SSM2166 (product data:http://tinyurl.com/6eadpn). The specifications indicate it *can* be operated cleanly. Of course, to set it up requires at least an oscilloscope... which many hams don't own (or know how to use). Based on the photos I've seen, I wouldn't buy one because of the poor soldering:http://img105.imagevenue.com/img.php..._122_173lo.jpg. I'll just continue to use my 2-tube (2x 3-500Z) speech "processor":http://www.rigpix.com/linears/sb220.htm Bryan WA7PRC WA7PRC, you are absolutely correct that the design is based on the Analog Devices SSM2166 chip. I'm curious about your soldering comment. Why do you feel the soldering is poor? We have not had a single failure due to poor soldering. We have approximately 400 units in the field at this time. The field failure is around 0.2% during the one year period that these units have been on the market. According the photo (http://i17.ebayimg.com/06/i/000/cb/2d/2695_1.JPG) that I found on a certain well-known auction site, all but a few solder joints had what I call "reverse fillets". The solder connections should have a concave shape but instead have a convex shape (too much solder). The few that didn't appeared to be overheated, with a grainy appearance. I hate to say so but, though you've had a low failure rate, they definitely wouldn't pass scrutiny to meet Mil, CGMP, ISO, or IPC standards. Bryan WA7PRC |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
That would mean that only 1 of the 400 units had failed in the field.
Is that correct ? Frank * * * KN6WH Absolutely correct Frank... and the failure was not a soldering issue. |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
According the photo (http://i17.ebayimg.com/06/i/000/cb/2d/
2695_1.JPG) that I found on a certain well-known auction site, all but a few solder joints had what I call "reverse fillets". *The solder connections should have a concave shape but instead have a convex shape (too much solder). * The few that didn't appeared to be overheated, with a grainy appearance. *I hate to say so but, though you've had a low failure rate, they definitely wouldn't pass scrutiny to meet Mil, CGMP, ISO, or IPC standards. Bryan WA7PRC You are right about possibly having too much solder... but that is certainly not a reliability issue. Grainy appearance of some joints is not uncommon for the new RoHS (high-concentration of tin) solders. As for passing military specs... that was never our intention with this product. Thanks for your comments. |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
"cmdr buzz corey" wrote in message ... On Nov 14, 5:13 am, Telstar Electronics wrote: The VoiceMax speech processor is not for everyone... It's only for radio operators that want maximum range from their rig. Along with maximum splatter. LOL. His website claims that Mouser Electronics is a "partner." Searches on Mouser for "Telstar" and "VoiceMax" return zero results. Hmm. . does buying some parts from Mouser make them a "partner." If so, I'm a "partner" with Mouser, too. LOL LOL |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
His website claims that Mouser Electronics is a "partner." *Searches on
Mouser for "Telstar" and "VoiceMax" return zero results. *Hmm. . does buying some parts from Mouser make them a "partner." *If so, I'm a "partner" with Mouser, too. The dictionary defines partner as "One that is united or associated with another or others in an activity or a sphere of common interest." So yes, in your example... you would be a partner of Mouser. |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
If I advertised that my company was a partner with HP (we bought the
computers from them) and Kenco I think they may object ....... Steve H Well... I can't speak for your business... but my partners are overjoyed that they are mentioned and have links available to their sites. www.telstar-electronics.com |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
Tel star Electronics
wrote: If I advertised that my company was a partner with HP (we bought the computers from them) and Kenco I think they may object ....... Steve H Well... I can't speak for your business... but my partners are overjoyed that they are mentioned and have links available to their sites. www.telstar-electronics.com I bet they don't have a link to your site;c) Steve H |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
I bet they don't have a link to your site;c)
Steve H That's entirely up to them... www.telstar-electronics.com |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com