Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill Janssen" wrote in message
... NoSPAM wrote: "Telstar Electronics" wrote in message ... On Nov 22, 8:43 pm, Stray Dog wrote: ? Despite what at least one other person responding to this said, I can rest assure you that if you run a doubler/multiplier stage even in a linear mode, AND if you tune the output of that stage to the multiple harmonic, you will definitely get output at that harmonic frequency which is stronger than the input drive voltage. Huh? No way... you MUST have non-linearities to make a doubler. Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). Assume you have two Class B (or AB) stages that are driven in push-pull. The outputs are connected in parallel. And to make things even more linear, let each stage have a resistive load. Each stage will produce a linearly amplified (but inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE POSITIVE HALF of the driving waveform only. Being driven 180 degrees out of phase with the input signal, the second stage will produce a linearly amplified but (again inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE NEGATIVE HALF of the driving waveform. Both outputs will have a DC offset of the plate (collector, drain) voltage. Class B or even Class AB in the circuit you described are non-linear. Try that circuit with Class A biasing. Bill K7NOM All that is really required is that the active devices have a different gain with positive input signals than with negative input signals. This is easily achieved with Class B and Class AB stages. As long as both stages are identical the fundamental and odd order harmonics will cancel. You are correct that with two Class A stages where the gain is identical for either polarity of input, the output signal will perfectly cancel. To make the method work here, you could synchronously switch the input signal between two perfectly linear stages. My point was that a full-wave rectified signal contains only even order harmonics. In the real world, as Stray Dog pointed out, ALL amplifier stages are nonlinear to some degree. The reason that Class AB and B amplifiers are considered linear RF amplifiers is that the tuned circuit on the output supplies supplies the "missing half" of the waveform. Without the tuned circuit, harmonics of the 2nd, 4th, 6th, etc. order as well as the fundamental are present. Odd order harmonics are only found if the gain is nonlinear for positive input signals. The tuned output stage passes the fundamental and suppresses the harmonics. Thanks for pointing this out, Bill. 73, Barry WA4VZQ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 14, 10:27*pm, "NoSPAM" wrote:
*Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). You mean to tell me that you take a clean sine wave... pass it through... say a single-ended class A amp... and you can put a tank on the output of that amplifier... and tune for a harmonic? You will get nothing. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message
... You mean to tell me that you take a clean sine wave... pass it through... say a single-ended class A amp... and you can put a tank on the output of that amplifier... and tune for a harmonic? You will get nothing. Class A means that plate current is flowing throughout the entire cycle of the input wave with the tube operated between cutoff and saturation. It says nothing about the linearity of the tube's transconductance (plate current as a function of grid voltage). With real devices, the transconductance curve is ALWAYS nonlinear to some degree, producing distortion (and harmonics). As you decrease the drive to a single-ended Class A amplifier, you are working on a smaller and smaller portion portion of the transconductance curve which decreases distortion. In the limit where only an infinitesimal part of the transconductance curve is used, you will get no distortion and no harmonics. Of course, in this situation the tube produces NO output.while drawing current from the power supply. The scheme that I was talking about, known as a push-push doubler, generally uses the tubes operated in Class B although AB operation will work too, but it produces less harmonics. The real advantage of a push-push doubler is that odd order harmonics and the fundamental cancel out, making the resultant waveform easier to filter. 73, Barry WA4VZQ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Telstar Electronics wrote: Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:16:29 -0800 (PST) From: Telstar Electronics Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Subject: Doubling On Dec 14, 10:27*pm, "NoSPAM" wrote: *Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). You mean to tell me that you take a clean sine wave... You might want to consider qualifying your thinking on this by setting a specification for harmonic distortion (in other words, you might need to consider how much of that "clean sine wave" signal has other components in it, including non-harmonic componentes) pass it through... say a single-ended class A amp... You might also want to consider, here, too, how much harmonic distortion THAT class A amplifier also causes which makes a contribution to the output. and you can put a tank on the output of that amplifier... and tune for a harmonic? You will get nothing. You might even more also want to consider that any tuned circuit will pass energy not at the resonance of that tuned circuit. You would probably contribute to your own enlightenment if you actually did some real experiments on this. It does not take long to do. Back when I was an undergraduate student with major in physics (BS, 1966), I worked in a Mossbauer Effect spectrometer lab and we built most of our equipment (dual delay line pulse amplifiers, regulated DC power supplies, repairing survey meters, etc) my boss had me build a waveform converter that used a network of resistors and diodss to convert a sawtooth waveform to sine wave and he was doing this because the book he got the circuit from said that there would be less than 1% harmonic distortion and he was interested in that specification for the spectrometer drives and all of our commercial high quality signal generators were worse in that specification, particulary at the very low frequencies we ran the drives at (less than one cycle per second). So, you have to define what you mean by "clean sine wave." But, I'll also say that, no, you will not get nothing if you tune to the second harmonic and have a linear amplifier (unless, maybe, you have a _perfect_ sine wave and a _perfect_ linear amplifier [the rest of you guys might want to comment on this yeah, I know about Fourier analysis, too]). |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message
... You mean to tell me that you take a clean sine wave... pass it through... say a single-ended class A amp... and you can put a tank on the output of that amplifier... and tune for a harmonic? You will get nothing. Of course you will. No active device is perfect. I decided to illustrate the fact that a single ended triode operated in Class A can produce harmonics. For a tube, I used a 6C4 (1/2 of a 12AU7) operated with 300 volts on the plate, a grid bias voltage of -7 volts, driven with a pure sine wave of 14 volts peak-to-peak. The high driving voltage was chosen to illustrate my earlier points, but the stage _IS_ operated Class A with the plate current between cutoff and saturation. Since the "rec"groups are not supposed to have binaries in them, I placed the graphics as PDF attachments to a post entitled "Harmonics generated by a Class A stage" in the "alt.binaries.ham-radio" newsgroup. If anyone wishes to see these curves and their newsgroup provider does not provide this group, I apologize. I believe Google Groups may not provide binaries, so I suggest getting a real newsreader and a good newsfeed. The first graph is entitled "Transconductance.pdf" and it shows the plate current as a function of the grid voltage. This data was obtained directly from the General Electric datasheet, ET-T1604 dated March, 1960. Since Excel stinks when plotting and doing calculations with data that is not best expressed in a bar chart, I used an evaluation copy of PSIPlot from Poly Software International (http://www.polysoftware,com) to generate the plots. {Real scientists and engineers never use a bar chart except when making presentations to brain challenged management!} :-) The driving waveform and the resultant plate current waveform are shown in the graph entitled "Waveforms.pdf". The obvious flattening is due to cutoff being approached at the crest of the driving waveform. After all, the transconductance curve is not perfectly a straight line. Finally, the spectrum of current waveform is plotted in the graph called "Spectrum.pdf". The spectrum has been normalized with respect to the DC output. The scale of the X-axis is slightly off but it was not worth my time correcting it. The fundamental is about 60 to 70 percent of the DC output, and the second harmonic is about 40 percent of the DC output. All higher harmonic are less than one percent of the DC output except the fifth. Higher harmonics are still greater than one tenth of a percent of the DC up to the _13th_ harmonic. Harmonics beyond the 14th are still readily measured. In conclusion, even single ended Class A amplifiers generate harmonics. If a lower driving voltage were used, the amplitudes of the harmonics would be reduced, but the fundamental would also be reduced. Please follow-up to the "rec.radio.amateur.homebrew" newsgroup. Golden-eared audiophools will be ignored. 73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:29:35 -0500, "NoSPAM"
wrote: "Telstar Electronics" wrote in message ... You mean to tell me that you take a clean sine wave... pass it through... say a single-ended class A amp... and you can put a tank on the output of that amplifier... and tune for a harmonic? You will get nothing. Of course you will. No active device is perfect. I decided to illustrate the fact that a single ended triode operated in Class A can produce harmonics. For a tube, I used a 6C4 (1/2 of a 12AU7) operated with 300 volts on the plate, a grid bias voltage of -7 volts, driven with a pure sine wave of 14 volts peak-to-peak. The high driving voltage was chosen to illustrate my earlier points, but the stage _IS_ operated Class A with the plate current between cutoff and saturation. Did you bypass the cathode resistor or not ? All active elements are more or less nonlinear, so if you need more or less linear amplification, you need to use feedback/feedforward. A non-bypassed cathode/emitter resistor will greatly improve the linearity of a single stage. Paul OH3LWR |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Paul Keinanen wrote: Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:47:22 +0200 From: Paul Keinanen Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Subject: Doubling On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:29:35 -0500, "NoSPAM" wrote: "Telstar Electronics" wrote in message ... You mean to tell me that you take a clean sine wave... pass it through... say a single-ended class A amp... and you can put a tank on the output of that amplifier... and tune for a harmonic? You will get nothing. Of course you will. No active device is perfect. I decided to illustrate the fact that a single ended triode operated in Class A can produce harmonics. For a tube, I used a 6C4 (1/2 of a 12AU7) operated with 300 volts on the plate, a grid bias voltage of -7 volts, driven with a pure sine wave of 14 volts peak-to-peak. The high driving voltage was chosen to illustrate my earlier points, but the stage _IS_ operated Class A with the plate current between cutoff and saturation. Did you bypass the cathode resistor or not ? I did the same experiment that he did (6C4) only ran the cathod at chassis, and grid through an RF choke, and 100 vDC on plate, and drove at about 1/2-1 volt and that is zero bias, no need for cathode cap bypass, and I got gain and second harmonic. All active elements are more or less nonlinear, so if you need more or less linear amplification, you need to use feedback/feedforward. A non-bypassed cathode/emitter resistor will greatly improve the linearity of a single stage. I'm still waiting for any "expert" comments from anyone who would care to speculate on the contributions, from oscillator harmonic content vs contribution from harmonic distortion in the amplifier. Paul OH3LWR |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 15, 11:29*pm, "NoSPAM" wrote:
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message ... You mean to tell me that you take a clean sine wave... pass it through... say a single-ended class A amp... and you can put a tank on the output of that amplifier... and tune for a harmonic? You will get nothing. Of course you will. *No active device is perfect. Hey OM The nature of the beast is: single ended amps produce rich even harmonics Push Pull amps produce rich odd harmonics so you can gits odd harmonics from single ended but they are poor like me. 73 OM n8zu |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, NoSPAM wrote: Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:27:11 -0500 From: NoSPAM Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Followup-To: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Subject: Doubling "Bill Janssen" wrote in message ... NoSPAM wrote: "Telstar Electronics" wrote in message ... On Nov 22, 8:43 pm, Stray Dog wrote: ? Despite what at least one other person responding to this said, I can rest assure you that if you run a doubler/multiplier stage even in a linear mode, AND if you tune the output of that stage to the multiple harmonic, you will definitely get output at that harmonic frequency which is stronger than the input drive voltage. Huh? No way... you MUST have non-linearities to make a doubler. Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). Assume you have two Class B (or AB) stages that are driven in push-pull. The outputs are connected in parallel. And to make things even more linear, let each stage have a resistive load. Each stage will produce a linearly amplified (but inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE POSITIVE HALF of the driving waveform only. Being driven 180 degrees out of phase with the input signal, the second stage will produce a linearly amplified but (again inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE NEGATIVE HALF of the driving waveform. Both outputs will have a DC offset of the plate (collector, drain) voltage. Class B or even Class AB in the circuit you described are non-linear. Try that circuit with Class A biasing. Bill K7NOM All that is really required is that the active devices have a different gain with positive input signals than with negative input signals. This is easily achieved with Class B and Class AB stages. As long as both stages are identical the fundamental and odd order harmonics will cancel. You are correct that with two Class A stages where the gain is identical for either polarity of input, the output signal will perfectly cancel. To make the method work here, you could synchronously switch the input signal between two perfectly linear stages. My point was that a full-wave rectified signal contains only even order harmonics. In the real world, as Stray Dog pointed out, ALL amplifier stages are nonlinear to some degree. The reason that Class AB and B amplifiers are considered linear RF amplifiers is that the tuned circuit on the output supplies supplies the "missing half" of the waveform. Without the tuned circuit, harmonics of the 2nd, 4th, 6th, etc. order as well as the fundamental are present. Odd order harmonics are only found if the gain is nonlinear for positive input signals. The tuned output stage passes the fundamental and suppresses the harmonics. Thanks for pointing this out, Bill. 73, Barry WA4VZQ I'll just add a footnote. When I actually built a few "buffer" amplifiers (tube jobs, 12BY7s, 6AG7s, etc), and for the hell of it, hooked up my scope (an old Tektronix solid state scope with one microsecond/div timebase, max) and actually looked at the sine wave (it looked 'nice' by the way) and then tuned the air variable through both the fundamental or the second harmonic (and I'm talking about 2-3 mHz signal source), I was amazed to be able to easily see the extra "peaks" come out of the "valleys" of the fundamental and I'm running these tubes at zero bias, low plate voltage, too. Look in the tube manuals for any class C tube and they talk about -50 to -70 v, grid negative wrt cathode. Class B and below talk about negative bias much lower but still pretty negative. Like I said, I was surprised. This _should_ be discussed in the ARRL handbooks (maybe it is, but I couldn't find it [maybe I didn't look hard enough?]) and it would be worth 1-2 pages to show everyone what these signals have in them. Here is another goodie (true story). R-390 local oscillator (runs 2.4 to 3.4 mHz, single 6BA6 tube). Had it set to about 3 mHz and looking at that "nice" (I have no harmonic meter to measure distortion) sine wave on the scope, and I "loaded down" the oscillator output lead with a tuned circuit and tuned that circuit to about 6 mHz. Guess what? Got double the number of peaks on the scope, just as with the linear amplifier. All calculate out on peaks vs time base divisions. So? Does anyone want to suggest that having the output LC circuit of an LC free-running oscillator tuned to double the frequency of the LC circuit is making it "oscillate" on its second overtone? ;-) Yeah, I checked resonant frequencies with a GDO on all this stuff, too. I'm not making any of this up. For the record, I also have an old Knight Kit RF oscillator (100Kc to 400 mHz on 3rd harmonic) and put that into my scope and the waveform looks like crap (but you can pick up the signal on a SW receiver set to where the scale matches the frequency of the oscillator). And, the shape of the crap changes from one end of the band to the other. Also have an old HP audio oscillator (high quality stuff) and it puts out a _very_ 'nice' sine wave no matter where in the range you set the dial (one Hz to 200 kHz). 73 all, |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Doubling car mileage secret!!! | CB | |||
Doubling a reference frequency | Homebrew |