Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 21, 4:31�pm, Joerg
wrote: AF6AY wrote: "Joerg" posted on Fri, Mar 20 2009 6:06 pm ken scharf wrote: JIMMIE wrote: Relays are ok in those applications, where there are actual currents flowing. What I meant was pure signal switching with no DC currents. That's called "dry" switching in the electronics industry, has been called that for over a half century. Sealed relays, Reeds, mercury-wetted and such work quite well there. But non-sealed versions have issues and a snap-on plastic cap ain't a seal. Didn't say that that it was a seal. But...there are many kinds of 'seals' and there are many kinds of contact alloys which few hobbyists investigate. Those problems became really nasty after we moved across an ocean and all this stuff was in a sea container for two months. After that almost all the band switching relays had problems, had to clean all of them. Now I am down to one sticky relay every couple month or so. My wife and I own a nice 2005 model Chevrolet Malibu MAXX that we've driven in both driving rain with some intermittent ice to Wisconsin from California and back, to Washington state from California and back. It has two little boxes of many small-signal relays, only a very few qualifying for large-signal types. Never a problem since we got it in late June of 2005. Those relay boxes all have lids and the small relays have little covers and that auto has definitely been exposed to the environment many times in the last 4 years. I can sympathize with your bad sea container shipping experience but consumer-grade radios (such as for amateur radio) were never designed to be exposed to sea evnvironments. Ask yourself how all those off- shore made radios made it to the USA? Inside standardized container boxes. I didn't make my comment lightly or pretend that I know everything there is to electronics. I do know, by a rather large set of experiences that 'dry' circuit relays (hermetically sealed OR by reasonably-good individual covers) will work without having to be 'operated many times' in order to 'clean their contacts.' I'll cite one application that is military, the US AN/PRC-104 manpack HF transceiver. About one-third of that backpack radio is an automatic antenna tuner so that one whip length can be optimized for best electrical characteristics. It does that with a rather conventional microprocessor control driving two banks of binary- sequence inductance and capacitance values switched by relays. It has been in operational status with the US Army since around 1984 and is expected to be phased out soon in favor of more modern HF-to-UHF transceiver designs. It's been a while since I've seen the guts of it but I don't recall that it had any hermetically-sealed relays in it. Right now I'm beginning to start cutting holes for a rebuild of an 'ancient' HF receiver once made for my late father wanting to tune to some SW BC stations, principally Radio Sweden back in 1964. I've been fortunate to get a large collection of North Electric small sealed relays dating back to about 1955 production which I've already breadboarded for bandswitching use. Very familiar with relay testing, I found NO problems from 'dry' contact switching. The low capacitance to ground and minimal series inductance from the contact set do NOT upset any of the L-C circuits being switched. replaced with PIN diode circuits and that, of course, made the issues completely go away. But it's always a hassle to do in an exisitng circuit.. Yes, I have that in the filter board of my two decade old Icom IC-R70, all switched with 'RF switch' diodes (no registry number). If needs be, that entire filter board could be enclosed to prevent any problems from the environment. Icom used that sort of semi-conductor switching for ease of overall parts cost along with reduced labor costs to Icom. Such work fine at the LOW impedances involved (50 to 75 Ohms) but I've tried to duplicate that at 10 KOhms on a breadboard and have run into problems with diodes' own impedances affecting circuit operation. Those could be solved, I'm sure, but I didn't care to spend weeks fiddling with them for my rebuild project. The relay contact set had only the shunt capacity and series inductance to contend with and those were very low values and easily compensated for alignment. 73, Len AF6AY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Homebrew Double conversion tube receiver Not HBR | Homebrew | |||
Direct Conversion Receiver with NPN transistors | Homebrew | |||
Direct conversion + DSP receiver for S-measurements? | Homebrew | |||
double double (bi)quad - feed impedance? | Antenna | |||
Least expensive, Small, Digital, double reduction receiver | Shortwave |