LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old April 21st 09, 04:19 AM posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2009
Posts: 1
Default If Superheterodyne, why not Subheterodyne?

John Larkin wrote:

On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:50:05 -0700 (PDT), Tim Shoppa
wrote:

A terminology question I suppose about the derivation of the term
"Superheterodyne" more than anything else:

Does the "Super" actually mean anything? Is there a Subheterodyne?


Supersonic.


So, if a basketball player from a certain team in Seattle were flying
on the Concorde, and listening to a particular brand of antique radio,
it'd be a supersonic SuperSonic's Superdyne supersonic heterodyne?


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
superheterodyne in the future ? Thierry Equipment 14 March 13th 04 08:33 AM
superheterodyne in the future ? Thierry Equipment 0 March 11th 04 10:01 PM
Superheterodyne LO question Liam Ness Homebrew 4 July 22nd 03 05:18 AM
Superheterodyne LO question Liam Ness Homebrew 0 July 21st 03 11:12 PM
Superheterodyne AM to SW conversion info Liam Ness Homebrew 4 July 13th 03 06:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017