| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
April 21st 09, 02:27 PM
posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
|
|||
|
|||
If Superheterodyne, why not Subheterodyne?
In rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Phil Allison wrote:
"AF6AY" Everyone ought to realize that "Wikipedia" data can be written by ANYONE ** As are NG posts. The difference being that Wikis are full of checkable references and are subject to on-going correction. The word prefix 'super' generally refers to something 'better' than the word without that prefix. ** So this radio ham clot has no idea what the origin of the term is really is ( although it has been posted) and is making the classic ****wit BLUNDER of trying to de-cipher the meaning from the word alone. Think also SUPERman. ** And supercilious. 73, Len AF6AY ex-ARRL member (for good reason) ** Lunatics like Len are not welcome as members ? Killfile, Phil. Phil, killfile. -- Mike Andrews, W5EGO Tired old sysadmin |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| superheterodyne in the future ? | Equipment | |||
| superheterodyne in the future ? | Equipment | |||
| Superheterodyne LO question | Homebrew | |||
| Superheterodyne LO question | Homebrew | |||
| Superheterodyne AM to SW conversion info | Homebrew | |||
Threaded Mode
